Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying sex differences in reading disability

Lessons from a twin study

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of sex differences in reading disability has been of recent interest in relation to sex ratios in families with reading disabled children and to possible sex biases in referred populations. Data from a study of 570 twins are used to develop alternative definitions of reading disability that vary in the manner to which sex effects are taken into account. These definitions include discrepancies between reading quotients and IQ, the use of the regression of reading onto IQ and chronological age/reading age differences. In each case the reading and spelling disability was defined either separately for the sexes or based upon the data for the sexes combined and with and without an IQ>90 exclusion criterion. The consequences of using the alternative definitions for prevalence, sex ratio and heritability are examined. The results demonstrate that the characteristics of reading disabled children vary with the way disability is defined. The excess of males seems to be a robust finding. Definitions that take into account differences in mean score for males and females reduce but do not eradicate the sex ratio. From the genetic analysis, there is no support for the suggestion that the genetic effect on reading is greater for females than males. It is concluded that the use of regression based procedures for identifying reading disability is desirable but that at present there is insufficient evidence to justify the adoption of separate regression procedures for the two sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests,Journal of Learning Disabilities 24: 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakwin, H. (1973). Reading disability in twins,Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 15: 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. & Butterworth, G. E. (1980). Verbal-performance discrepancies: Relationships to birth risk and specific reading retardation,Cortex 16: 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. R. (1959). An historical and critical account of the accomplishment quotient idea,British Journal of Educational Psychology 29: 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, M. & Critchley, E. A. (1978).Dyslexia defined. London: Heinemann Medical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project, pp. 123–135, in: D. B. Gray & J. F. Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia, Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C. & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data,Behaviour Genetics 15: 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C. & Fulker, D. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences,Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 37: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Fulker, D. W. & LaBuda, M. C. (1987). Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins,Nature 329: 537–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Gillis, J. J. & Wadsworth, S. (in press). Genes and genders: A twin study of reading disability, in: A. Galaburda (ed.),The extraordinary brain.

  • Fredman, G. & Stevenson, J. (1988). Reading processes in specific reading retarded and reading backward 13 year olds,British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, N. G. (1981). A reaction to the conference on sex differences and dyslexia, pp. xiii-xviii, in: A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert & N. Gartrell (eds.),Sex differences in dyslexia. Towson, MD: The Orton Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. & Stevenson, J. (1985). A twin study of genetic influences on behavioral deviance,Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 24: 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. L. (1986). The contribution of twin research to the study of the etiology of reading disability, pp. 3–20, in: S. D. Smith (ed.),Genetics and learning disabilities. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., Matthews, R. & Maclean, R. (1986). Behaviour problems in specific reading retarded and general reading backward children: A longitudinal study,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 27: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. D. (1967).Neale analysis of reading ability manual. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlby, S. J. & Hall, F. (1980). Early interactions and later language development of children whose mothers come from disrupted families of origin, pp. 61–75, in: T. Field, S. Goldberg, D. Stern & A. M. Sostek (eds.),High-risk infants and children: Adult and peer interactions. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., McCabe, L. L., Smith, S. D., Lefly, D. L., Bookman, M. O., Kimberling, W. J. & Lubs, H. A. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia,Child Development 57: 1001–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (1970).Education, health and behaviour. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 16: 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonell, F. J. & Schonell, P. E. (1960).Diagnostic and attainment testing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., McGee, R., McKenzie, D., Williams, S. & Silva, P. (1987). Further evidence relating to the distinction between specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness,British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M. & Escobar, M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls,Journal of the American Medical Association 264: 998–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovitch, K. (in press). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?,Reading Research Quarterly.

  • Stevenson, J. (1991). IQ controlis valuable in defining specific learning disabilities. Submitted for publication.

  • Stevenson, J., Graham, P., Fredman, G. & McLoughlin, V. (1987). A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling and ability and disability,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 28: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. & Fredman, G. (1990). The social environmental correlates of reading ability,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 31: 681–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallal, P., Ross, R. & Curtiss, S. (1989). Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impaired children,Neuropsychologia 27: 987–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. S. & Thompson, M. W. (1986).Genetics in medicine. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1963).The concepts of over- and under-achievement. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities and academic achievement in males and females with learning disabilities: A review of the literature,Journal of Learning Disabilities 23: 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., Stevenson, J., Gilger, J. W. & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Gender ratios among reading-disabled children and their siblings. Submitted for publication.

  • Wechsler, D. (1974).Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, W., Rutter, M., Berger, M. & Thompson, J. (1974). Over- and under-achievement in reading: Distribution in the general population.British Journal of Educational Psychology 44: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevenson, J. Identifying sex differences in reading disability. Read Writ 4, 307–326 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027711

Key words

Navigation