Skip to main content
Log in

Natural fracture profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients

  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Thirteen natural rock profiles (Barton and Choubey, 1977) are analyzed for their fractal properties. Most of the profiles were found to approximate fractal curves but some also showed features of specific wavelengths and amplitudes superimposed on fractal characteristics. The profiles showed fractal dimensions from 1.1 to 1.5 covering a range of selfsimilar and self-affine curves. The analysis results suggest a negative correlation between fractal dimension,D, and amplitude,A. Joint roughness coefficients (JRC) show a positive correlation with amplitude,A, and a negative correlation with fractal dimension,D. A numerical model of fracture closure is used to investigate the effects of different profile characteristics (D, A and sample size) on the nature of dilation and contact area, using the natural profiles and synthetic fractional Brownian motion profiles. Smooth profiles (low JRC, highD, lowA) display many small contact regions whereas rough fractures (high JRC, lowD, highA) display few large contact areas. The agreement with published experimental data supports the suggested correlations between JRC and the fractal parameters,A andD. It is suggested that observed scale effects in JRC and joint dilation can be explained by small differential strain discontinuities across fractures, which originate at the time of fracture formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandis, S., Lumsden, A. C., Barton, N. R. (1981): Experimental studies of scale effects on the shear behaviour of rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 18, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N., Bandis, S., Bakhtar, K. (1985): Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 22, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N., Choubey, V. (1977): The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mechanics 10, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1987): Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J. Geophys. Res. B 92, 1337–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R., Scholz, C. H. (1985): Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. B 90, 12575–12582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. R., Warriner, J. B. (1989): Relationship between the fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficient. Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 24, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. R. (1989): Fractal characterization of joint roughness in welded tuff at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In: Proc., 30th U.S. Symp. Rock Mech., Morgantown, West Virginia, 193–200.

  • Engelder, T., Scholz, T. C. (1981): Fluid flow along very smooth joints at effective pressures up to 200 MPa. In: Mechanical behaviour of crustal rocks. Am. Geophys. Union Monogr. 24, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, J. (1988): Fractals. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. L., Oelfke, S. M., Speck, R. C. (1992): Applicability of fractal characterization and modelling to rock joint profiles. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 29, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwano, M. (1990): Probabilistic modelling of a single fracture. M.Sc. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, P. (1991): Deep bore hole log evidence for fractal distribution of fractures in crystalline rock. Geophys. J. Int. 107, 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-H., Carr, J. R., Barr, D. J., Haas, C. J. (1990): The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27, 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maerz, N.H., Franklin, J. A. (1990): Roughness scale effects and fractal dimension. In: Proc., First Int. ISRM Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway, 121–126.

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982): The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1985): Self-affine fractals and fractal dimension. Physica Scripta 32, 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., van Ness, J. W. (1968): Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev. 10, 422–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., Passoja, D. E., Paullay, A. J. (1984): Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. Nature 308, 721–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralha, J., Charrua-Graça, J. G. (1990): An experience on the application of fractal theory to basic shear strength studies. In: Proc., Int. ISRM Symp. Rock Joints, Loen, Norway, 667–672.

  • Muraoka, H., Kamata, H. (1983): Displacement distribution along minor faults. J. Struct. Geol. 5, 483–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D. D., Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., Cook, N. G. W. (1989): The fractal geometry of flow paths in natural fractures in rock and the approach to percolation. PAGEOPH 131, 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, C. Y., Sayles, R. S., Jones, T. A. (1992): Surface measurement and fractal characterization of naturally fractured rocks. J. Phys. D: Applied Phys. 25, 1269–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, W. L., Tullis, T. (1991): Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness. J. Geophys. Res. B 96, 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, K. G., Gale, J. E. (1985): Water flow in a natural rock fracture as a function of stress and sample size. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 22, 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saupe, D. (1988): Algorithms for random fractals. In: Peitgen, H., Saupe, D. (eds.) The science of fractal images, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, 71–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, R. S., Thomas, T. R. (1977): The spatial representation of surface roughness by means of the structure function: a practical alternative to correlation. Wear 42:263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, Y. W., Tsang, C. F. (1989): Flow channeling in a single fracture as a two-dimensional strongly heterogeneous permeable medium. Water Resour. Res. 25, 2076–2080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, Y. W., Witherspoon, P. A. (1983): The dependence of fracture mechanical and fluid flow properties on fracture roughness and sample size. J. Geophys. Res. B 88, 2359–2366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. C., Neuman, S. P., Sully, M. J., Evans, D. D. (1992): Reconstruction and geostatist analysis of multiscale fracture apertures in a large block of welded tuff. Geophys. Res. Let. 19, 1029–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R. (1988): Fractals in nature. In: Peitgen, H., Saupe D. (eds.) The science of fractal images, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, N., Fukushige, I. (in press): Experimental study on the relation between fractal dimension and shear strength. In: Proc., ISRM Int. Conference Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses, Lake Tahoe, California.

  • Watterson, J. (1986): Fault dimensions, displacements and growth. PAGEOPH 124, 365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Pariseau, W. G. (in press): Fractal estimation of joint roughness coefficients. In: Proc., ISRM Int. Conference Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses, Lake Tahoe, California.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odling, N.E. Natural fracture profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients. Rock Mech Rock Engng 27, 135–153 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020307

Keywords

Navigation