Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of occupied host fruit by plum curculio females (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Larval survival of plum curculios (PCs),Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst), was found to decrease with increasing egg density per fruit. Subsequently, we assayed PCs for propensity to avoid egg-laying at sites (immature plums) already occupied by conspecific eggs. Laboratory choice tests showed PCs made an equal number of visits to and ovipositions in fruit with a single oviposition as in clean fruit. Although there was a trend toward more visits to fruit which contained four or eight oviposition wounds and eggs or eight artificial punctures than to clean fruit, PCs oviposited less frequently into these than clean fruit. Results suggest that wounding of fruit may enhance the ability of ovipositing PCs to locate fruit, but at the same time may furnish cues allowing some degree of discrimination against heavily infested fruit for oviposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Faeth, S.H. 1985. Host leaf selection by leafminers: Interaction among trophic levels.Ecology 66:870–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, S. 1980. Chemical attraction of plant-feeding insects to plants, pp. 67–143,in Coaker, T.H. (ed.). Applied Biology, Vol. 5. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolami, V., Vianello, A., Strapazzon, A., Ragazzi, E., andVeronese, G. 1981. Ovipositional deterrents inDacus oleae.Entomol. Exp, Appl. 19:177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin, S.W., Yonce, C.E., andHollon, J.P. 1968. Crowding effects on plum curculio reared at several densities on two sizes of green apples.J. Econ. Entomol. 61:816–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J.S. 1978. The concepts of olfactory “arrestment” and “attraction.”Physiol. Entomol. 3:91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, M.W., Lux, S., andDmoch, J. 1984. Oviposition behavior and pod marking in the cabbage seed weevil,Ceutorhynchus assimilis.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34:277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, E., andDyHall, F.R. 1977. Effect of feeding and oviposition by the plum curculio on apple and plum fruit abscission.J. Econ. Entomol. 70:603–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.L. 1979. A possible sensory function for the stop-go patterns of running in phorid flies.Physiol. Entomol. 4:361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E.R., andHeath, R.R. 1985. Influence ofAmaranthus hybridus (L.) allelochemicais on oviposition behavior ofSpodoptera exigua andS. eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, E.D., Hauschild, K.L, Hubbell, G.L., andProkopy, R.J. 1982. Diurnal behavior of plum curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults within host trees in nature.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 75:357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Grass, P., Mcpheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N., andWeis, A.E. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R.J. 1972. Evidence for a marking pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies.Environ. Entomol. 1:326–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R.J. 1981. Epideictic pheromones influencing spacing patterns of phytophagous insects, pp. 181–213, in D.A. Nordlund, R.L. Jones, and W.L. Lewis, (eds.). Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R.J., Roitberg, B.D., andAverill, A.L. 1984. Resource Partitioning, pp. 301–330,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaintance, A.L., andJenne, E.L. 1912. The plum curculio.U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Entomol. Bull. 103:13–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., andRadke, C.D. 1981. Host plant constituents as oviposition deterrents for the cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni. Entamai.Exp. Appl. 30:201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., andRadke, C.D. 1985. Constituents of host and non-host plants deterring oviposition by the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39:21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg, B.D., andProkopy, R.J. 1982. Resource assessment by adult and larval codling moths.N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 90:258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg, B.D., andProkopy, R.J. 1984. Host discrimination by adult and larval European apple sawfliesHoplocampa testudinea (Klug) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae).Environ. Entomol. 13:1000–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., andSchoonhoven, L.M. 1977. Assessment of egg load byPieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Nature 266:352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K.N., andBasit, A. 1982. Inhibition of oviposition by volatiles of certain plants and chemicals in the leafhopperAmrasca devastans (Distant).J. Chem. Ecol. 8:329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H.H. 1973. Behavioral responses to insect pheromones.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 18:349–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansly, P.A., andCate, J.R. 1984. Discrimination by ovipositing boll weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) against previously infestedHampea (Malvaceae) flower buds.Environ. Entomol. 13:1361–1365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butkewich, S.L., Prokopy, R.J. & Green, T.A. Discrimination of occupied host fruit by plum curculio females (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Chem Ecol 13, 1833–1841 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013232

Key words

Navigation