Skip to main content
Log in

First experimental study of carbon dioxide digital subtraction lymphangiography

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fourteen pigs with an average weight of 17 kg were used in this study. Under general anesthesia and magnification 1–3 ccm/kg of carbon dioxide were administered in the lymph vessels of the front and rear legs. Imaging of the peripheral lymph vessels, lymph nodes and the thoracic duct was achieved with digital subtraction angiography. The quality of lymphangiography was satisfactory and comparable with that of the standard non-ionic contrast agent. It is anticipated that further technical evolution will permit the application of CO2/DSA lymphangiography to man. Carbon dioxide is non-nephrotoxic and is non-allergic; it is inexpensive, can be administered in unlimited quantity and is quickly eliminated via the pulmonary system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavo JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M (1991) The risks of death and of severe non-fatal reactions with high versus low osmolarity contrast media: a metaanalysis. AIR 156:825–832

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan KL, Bonn J, Shapiro MJ, Gardiner A (1995) Venography with carbon dioxide as a contrast agent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18:141–145

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seeger JM, Self S, Harward TRS et al. (1993) Carbon dioxide gas as an arterial contrast agent. Ann Surg 217:688–698

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kerns SR, Hawkins IF Jr (1995) Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography. Expanding applications and technical evolution. Am J Radiol 164:735–741

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kerns SR, Hawkins IF Jr, Sabatelli FW (1995) Current status of carbon dioxide angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 33:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawkins IW (1982) Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography. Am J Roentgenol 139:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krasny R, Hollmann JP, Guenther W (1987) Erste Erfahrungen mit CO2 als gasförmiges Kontrastmittel in der DSA. Fortschr Roentgenstr 146:450–455

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weaver FA, Pentecost MJ, Yellin AE et al. (1991) Clinical applications of carbon dioxide/digital subtraction arteriography. J Vasc Surg 13:266–273

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bettmann MA, D'Agostino R, Juravsky LI (1994) Carbon dioxide as an angiography contrast agent. Invest Radiol 29:545–546

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hahn ST, Pfamatter T, Cho KJ (1955) Carbon dioxide gas as a venous contrast agent to guide upper-arm insertion of central venous catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oppenheimer MJ, Durant DM, Stauffer H et al (1956) Cardiovascular respiratory effects and associated changes in blood chemistry. Am J Physiol 186:325–334

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moore RM, Braselton CW (1940) Injections of air and carbon dioxide into a pulmonary vein. Ann Surg 112:212–218

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hipona FA, Park WM (1967) Capnosplenoportography: assessment of portal vein patency in dogs with carbon dioxide gas. AJR 99:606–611

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordenberg DB, Brogton BG (1967) Hepatic venography with carbon dioxide. Maryland State Med J 17:79–80

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bendib MBT, Toumi M, Boudjellab AH (1977) Carboxyangiographic et carboxyangiographic clargi en cardiologic. Ann Radiol 20:673–686

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stauffer HM, Durantt M, Oppenheimer MJ (1956) Gas embolism: roentgenologic considerations including the experimental use of carbon dioxide as an intracardiac contrast material. Radiology 66:686–692

    Google Scholar 

  17. Durant TM, Stauffer HM, Oppenheimer MJ, Paul RE (1957) The safety of intravascular carbon dioxide and its use for roentgenologic visualization of intracardiac structures. Ann Intern Med 47:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scatliff JH, Kummer AJ, Janzen AH (1959) The diagnosis of pericardial effusion with intracardiac carbon dioxide. Radiology 73:871–874

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hawkins IF, Caridi JG, Weingarten KE (1996) Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography versus iodinated contrast imaging. 5th Internal Course on Vascular and Interventional Radiology as Therapeutic Alternative, Las Palmas — Spain p 145–175

  20. Schmitz-Rode T, Alzen G, Gunther RW, Pott H (1993) CO2 controlled injection system experiments in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller FJ, Mineau DE, Koehler PR et al (1983) Clinical intraarterial digital subtraction imaging. Radiology 148:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coffey R, Quisling RG, Mickle JP et al. (1984) The cerebrovascular effects of intraarterial CO2 in quantities required for diagnostic imaging. Radiology 151:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shifrin S, Plich WB, Verstandig AG, Gomori M (1990) Cerebral angiography with gaseous carbon dioxide CO2. J Cardiovase Surg 31:603–606

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harward IF, Smith S, Hawkins RVT, Seeger JM (1993) Follow-up evaluation after renal artery bypass surgery with use of carbon dioxide arteriography and color-flow duplex scanning. J Vase Surg 18:23–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimakakos, P.B., Papasavval, M., Stefanopoulos, T. et al. First experimental study of carbon dioxide digital subtraction lymphangiography. Eur J Plast Surg 20, 132–135 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002046

Key words

Navigation