Skip to main content
Log in

A random allocation system with the minimization method for multi-institutional clinical trials

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the random allocation system used to perform precise and rapid treatment assignments in multi-institutional clinical trials. This system is based on sophisticated randomization procedures, according to Pocock and Simon's minimization method and Zelen's method for institution balancing. The major advantage of randomized treatment assignments with this system is to balance treatment numbers for each level of various prognostic factors over the entire trial and at the same time balance the allocation of treatments within an institution. Therefore, the randomized treatment assignments by this system can prevent degrading of the statistical power of a particular treatment factor. This system is designed to run on a small-sized notebook computer and therefore can be set up beside a telephone for registration, without occupying a large space. At present, this system is conveniently being used in two clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matts, J.P., and Lachin, J.M., Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials.Control. Clin. Trials 9:327–344, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hallstrom, A., and Davis, K., Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization.Control. Clin. Trials 9:375–382, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalish, L.A., and Begg, C.B., Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A review.Stat. Med. 4:129–144, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pocock, S.J., Clinical trials, A practical approach. Wiley, Chichester, 66–89, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zelen, M., The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials.J. Chron. Dis. 27:365–375, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pocock, S.J., Allocation of patients to treatment in clinical trials.Biometrics 35:183–197, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Staquet, M., and Dalesio, O., Designs for phase III trials. InCancer Clinical Trials Buyse, M.E.,et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 261–275, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akazawa, K., Nakamura, T., Moriguchi, S., Shimada, M., and Nose, Y., Simulation program for estimating statistical power of Cox's proportional hazards model assuming no specific distribution for the survival time.Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 35:203–212, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, M.E., Tolley, H.D., Bryson, M.C., and Goldman, A.S., Covariate analysis of survival data: A small-sample study of Cox's model.Biometrics 38:685–698, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lange, N., and MacIntyre, J., A computerized patient registration and treatment randomization system for multi-institutional clinical trials.Control. Clin. Trials 6:38–50, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krischer, J.P., Hurley, C., Pillalamarri, M., Pant, S., Bleichfeld, C., Opel, M., and Shuster, J.J., An automated patient registration and treatment randomization system for multicenter clinical trials.Control. Clin. Trials 12:367–377, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akazawa, K., Odaka, T., Sakamoto, M. et al. A random allocation system with the minimization method for multi-institutional clinical trials. J Med Syst 15, 311–319 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999168

Keywords

Navigation