Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of cross-compatibility inEriastrum densifolium (Polemoniaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-compatibility within and among populations of the perennialEriastrum densifolium was investigated to determine if sterility barriers have evolved within this polytypic species, and to correlate any such barriers to previously known patterns of genetic and morphological variation. Furthermore, the reproductive affinities of the endangeredE. densifolium subsp.sanctorum are investigated. Results indicate that no single population or group of populations is reproductively isolated from all other populations, and that F1 hybrids are fully fertile. Interspecific crosses (withE. eremicum andE. sapphirinum) were largely unsuccessful. The endangeredE. densifolium subsp.sanctorum demonstrates high interfertility with all other populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brunell, M. S., 1996: Biosystematics ofEriastrum densifolium (Bentham)Mason (Polemoniaceae). — Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993: Genetic variation in the endangered Santa Ana River Woolly-Star,Eriastrum densifolium spp.sanctorum (Polemoniaceae). — Pl. Spec. Biol.8: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1997: RAPD marker variation inEriastrum densifolium (Polemoniaceae): implications for subspecific delimitation and conservation. — Syst. Bot.22: 543–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, J. H., Jones, C. E., Wheeler, J., DeSimone, S., 1988: The ecology ofEriastrum densifolium ssp.sanctorum (Milliken)Mason: final report. — Prepared for the department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (COE), Los Angeles District.

  • Clausen, J., 1951: Stages in the evolution of plant species. — Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, T., 1934: A revision of the subgenusHugelia of the genusGilia (Polemoniaceae). — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club61: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M., 1993: Optimal outcrossing and pollinator foraging distance in the Santa Ana River Woolly Star,Eriastrum densifolium ssp.sanctorum (Milliken)Mason (Polemoniaceae). — M. A. Thesis, California State University, Fullerton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., 1930: The genetical theory of natural selection. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950: Genetic and taxonomic studies inGilia. I.Gilia capitata. — Aliso2: 239–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1954: Genetic and taxonomic studies inGilia. IV.Gilia achilleaefolia. — Aliso3: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1966: The selective origin of incompatibility barriers in the plant genusGilia. — Amer. Naturalist100: 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Plant speciation. 2nd edn. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., 1990: Allozyme diversity in plant species. — InBrown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., Weir, B. S., (Eds): Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, pp. 43–63. — Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, W. L., 1943: Flora of California.3, pp. 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1978: The origin of isolating mechanisms in flowering plants. — Evol. Biol.11: 185–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, H. L., 1945: The genusEriastrum and the influence ofBentham andGray upon the problem of generic confusion inPolemoniaceae. — Madroño8: 65–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1942: Systematics and the origin of the species. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, A. A., 1991: Reproductive biology of the endangered Santa Ana River Woolly Star,Eriastrum densifolium ssp.sanctorum (Milliken)Mason (Polemoniaceae). — M. A. Thesis, California State University, Fullerton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz, P. A., 1974: A California Flora and supplement. — Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R. W., 1993:Eriastrum. — InHickman, J. C., (Ed.): The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, pp. 826–828. — Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R., 1989: Analyzing tables of statistical tests. — Evolution43: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Crovello, T. J., 1970: The biological species concept: a critical evaluation. — Amer. Naturalist104: 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. — New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, C. A., 1989: Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. 2nd edn. — London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R., 1889: Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection. — London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunell, M.S., Whitkus, R. Analysis of cross-compatibility inEriastrum densifolium (Polemoniaceae). Pl Syst Evol 215, 241–254 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984658

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984658

Key words

Navigation