Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding systems in a secondary deciduous forest in Venezuela: The importance of life form, habitat, and pollination specificity

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breeding systems and mating systems of plants in a previously studied secondary deciduous forest were reanalysed in the context of new data. In this analysis, we increased the number of plant species (up to approximately 25% of the plant species in the community), included other life forms (23 annual and perennial species, plus habitat disturbance categories), and considered information about pollinator specificity. The frequencies of species with different sexual systems in a sample of 51 species were 82% hermaphrodite, 14% monoecious, and 4% dioecious. The frequencies of breeding systems in the sample of 49 hermaphroditic and monoecious species were 53% self-incompatible and 47% self-compatible. Self-compatible species included seven partially self-compatible, three self-compatible non-autogamous, and 13 self-compatible autogamous species. None of the species evaluated proved to be agamospermous. Fifty-five percent of the species tested were obligate outbreeders. The proportion of self-incompatible species was higher among trees and shrubs than among annual herbs. The proportion of self-compatible species for perennial herbs and lianas was not different. The association between annual herbs and autogamy was not strong: seven of 13 species were autogamous, five were partially self-compatible, and one was self-incompatible. The main characteristics or factors associated with breeding system were life cycle and successional stage. Short-lived species were mostly self-compatible, and xenogamy tended to be associated with forest and forest-border. In contrast, pollination specificity and life form were not consistently related to breeding system (self-compatibility or self-incompatibility) and mating system (xenogamy or autogamy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R. J., Forbes, D. G., 1993: Outcrossing rate and self-incompatibility in the colonizing speciesSenecio squalidus. — Heredity71: 155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, R. W., 1975: The mating system and microevolution. — Genetics79: 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics, J., 1968: Evolution in closely adjacent populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. — Heredity23: 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, M. T. K., 1974: Chiasma frequency evidence on the evolution of autogamy inLimnanthes floccosa (Limnanthaceae). — Evolution27: 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. S., 1969: Speciation among tropical forest trees: some deductions in the light of recent evidence. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.1: 155–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G., 1974: The evolution of weeds. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.5: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., 1974: Breeding system of tree species of a lowland tropical community. — Evolution28: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Evolution of diocey in flowering plants. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.11: 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms. — Amer. J. Bot.72: 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, P., Steyermark, J., 1983: Florula de los bosques decíduos de Caracas. — Mem. Soc. Ci. Nat. La Salle43: (120).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. H., 1985: Breeding systems in the flora of tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. — Biotropica17: 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. T., 1981: Some Malaysian Dipterocarps. III Breeding systems. — Malaysian Forester44: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W., 1977: Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. — Evolution31: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, M. S., Thien, L. B., 1992: Self-incompatibility inIpomoea pes-caprae (Convolvulaceae). — Amer. Midl. Naturalist128: 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J., Madriz, A., Tosi, A. jr., 1976: Zonas de vida de Venezuela. — Memoria explicativa sobre el mapa ecológico, 2nd edn. — Caracas: M. A. C. — FONIAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1974: The evolutionary advantage of recombination. — Genetics78: 737–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, S., Schemske, D. W., 1984: Dioecy and monoecy in the flora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands: ecological correlates. — Biotropica16: 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1981: Plant speciation, 2nd edn. — Columbia, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, H. M., Carreón, A. Y., 1987: Notas sobre la ecología reproductive de árboles en un bosque mesófilo de montaña en Michoacán, México. — Bol. Soc. Bot. México47: 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokche, O., 1984: Estudio comparativo de la biologío reproductiva y depredación de semillas de algunas species del géneroBauhinia L. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). — Trabajo especial de grado, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Biología, Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokche, O., Ramírez, N., 1994: Biología reproductiva deSolanum gardneri Sendth. (Solanaceae). — Acta Científica Venezolana45 (Suppl. 1): 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Manríuez, G., Oyama, K., 1992: Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. — Amer. J. Bot.79: 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K., 1976: The evolution of inbreeding in plants. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.7: 469–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H., 1970: Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forest. — Amer. Naturalist104: 501–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarne, P., Charlesworth, D., 1993: The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.24: 441–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, W. J., 1983: Self-incompatibility in Central AmericanHeliconia. — Evolution37: 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1972: Competition for pollinator service: A stimulus for the evolution of autogamy. — Evolution26: 668–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1975: Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants. — Amer. Naturalist190: 437–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., 1968: Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. — Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G., 1979: Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. — Amer. Naturalist113: 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Benefits and handicaps of sexual reproduction. — Evol. Biol.13: 69–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., 1974: Recombination and the rate of evolution. — Genetics78: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, L. A., 1985: Breeding systems of Central AmericanAphelandra (Acanthaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.72: 1551–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, C. K., 1987: Breeding systems of selected Galapagos Islands angiosperms. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 1694–1705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, P., Bawa, K. S., 1978: Sex ratios in some tropical forest trees. — Evolution32: 812–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Plant reproductive characteristics during secondary succession in neotropical lowland forest ecosystems. — Biotropica12: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, J. A. D., Bazzaz, F. A., 1982: Competitive interactions in plant communities of different successional ages. — Ecology63: 314–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. C., Jain, S. K., 1981: Are inbreeders better colonizers? — Oecologia49: 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimundez, E., Ramírez, N., 1994: Biología reproductiva de una hierba perenne:Hipoxis decumbens L. — Acta Ci. Venez45: (Suppl. 1): 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, N., 1988: Como evaluar el sistema de polinización a nivel comunitario. — Acta Ci. Venez.39: 304–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: Reproductive biology of a tropical palm swamp community in the Venezuelan Llanos. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 1260–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Plant reproductive biology of herbaceous monocots in Venezuelan tropical cloud forest. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, S. S., Ricklefs, R. E., 1995: Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 596–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruíz-Zapata, T., Arroyo, M. K., 1978: Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. — Biotropica10: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W., 1978: Evolution of reproductive characteristics inImpatiens (Balsaminaceae): The significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. — Ecology59: 596–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnee, L., 1984: Plantas comunes de Venezuela, 3rd edn. — Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Ediciones de la Biblioteca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrevila, C., Arroyo, M. K., 1982: Breeding systems in a montane tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. — Pl. Syst. Evol.140: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R., Rohlf, F., 1969: Biometry. — San Franciso, California: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T., Rollins, R. C., 1977: The evolution of autogamy in species of the mustard genusLeavenworthia. — Evolution31: 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1957: Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. — Amer. Naturalist91: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1970: Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: Pollination mechanisms. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.1: 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A., Huber, O., 1978: Flora del Avila. — Caracas: Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamayo, F., 1943: Notas ecológicas Venezolanas: proceso de despoblación y reposición vegetal de las colinas de Caracas. — Caracas: Escuela Técnica Industrial, talleres de artes gráficas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, E. V. J., 1982: Species diversity and reproductive mechanisms in Jamaican trees. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.18: 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. C., LaFrankie, J. V., 1993: Sex, size, and interyear variation in flowering among dioecious trees of Malayan rain forest. — Ecology74: 1529–1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, M. C., 1989: Ecología de polinización de un bosque decíduo secundario. — Trabajo especial de grado, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Biología, Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D. M., 1979: The relative costs of self- and cross-fertilzed seeds inImpatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.66: 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xena de Enrech, N., Ramírez, N., Sobrevila, C., 1988: Natas sobre la dinámica reproductiva de una comunidad vegetal de vega de rio. — Actes Simp. Int. Bot.Pius Font i Quer 2: 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaimes, I., Ramírez, N. Breeding systems in a secondary deciduous forest in Venezuela: The importance of life form, habitat, and pollination specificity. Pl Syst Evol 215, 23–36 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984645

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984645

Key words

Navigation