Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic analysis ofIridaceae with parsimony and distance methods using the plastid generps4

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A molecular phylogeny of the familyIridaceae based on the plastid generps4 was obtained using both parsimony and distance methods. Thirty-four species were examined together with eight outgroup species. Results show that theIridaceae are monophyletic, and thatIsophysis is likely to be the earliest emerging genus. SubfamilyIxioideae plus the generaAristea andNivenia form a strongly supported clade. Within subfam.Iridoideae, the tribeIrideae includes the genusBobartia (of disputed position), and the tribeMariceae includesCypella. The division ofIridoideae into tribes is consistent with their geographical distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bittar, G., 1995: Phylogénie: histoire, concepts, principes et présentation de nouvelles méthodes d'analyse numérique de l'évolution moléculaire. — Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Carter, L., 1994: New probabilistic and numerical phenetics methods for inferring natural groupings and phylogenesis. — In: Proceedings of the International Meeting “Ecology and statistical methods”, Niort, France, pp. 145–150.

  • Bremer, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evolution42: 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. W., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y. L., Kron, K. A., Retting, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Systma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedren, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K. J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Strauss, S. H., Xiang, Q. Y., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swensen, S. M., Williams, S. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Eguiarte, L. E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G. H. J., Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: Molecular phylogenetics ofLilianae. — InRudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution,1: pp. 109–137. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, M. T., Zurawski, G., 1992: Chloroplast DNA and the study of plant phylogeny: present status and future prospects. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 1–13. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91: 6795–6801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T., Yeo, P. F., 1985: The families of monocotyledons. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, M. R., Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W., Clark, W. D., Kress, W. J., Hills, H. G., Eguiarte, L. E., Smith, J. F., Gaut, B. S., Zimmer, E. A., Learn, G. H., 1993: Phylogenetic hypothesis for the monocotyledons constructed fromrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 607–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielly, L., Taberlet, P., 1994: The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: non-coding versusrbcL sequences. — Molec. Biol. Evol.11: 769–777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1990: Phylogeny and classification ofIridaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.77: 607–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: An overview of the systematics, phylogeny and biology of the AfricanIridaceae. — Contr. Bolus Herb.13: 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Relationships ofBobartia. — S. African J. Bot.58: 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: Pollination biology ofLapeirousia subgenusLapeirousia (Iridaceae) in southern Africa; floral divergence and adaptation for longtongued fly pollination. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, R. C. H. J. v., Hart, H., Mes, T. H. M., Sandbrink, J. M., 1994: Molecular evolution of non-coding regions of the chloroplast genome in theCrassulaceae and related species. — Curr. Genet.25: 558–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoot, S. B., Culham, A., Crane, P. R., 1995: The utility ofatpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: comparison withrbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in theLardizabalaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A., Soltis, D. E., 1994:matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction inSaxifragaceae s.str. — Syst. Bot.19: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1995: Phylogenetic inference inSaxifragaceae sensu stricto andGilia (Polemoniaceae) usingmatK sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamppa, G. K., Bendich, A. J., 1979: Chloroplast DNA sequence homologies among vascular plants. — Pl. Physiol.63: 660–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M., Doyle, J. J., Palmer, J. D., 1990: Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast-DNA inverted repeat in theLeguminosae subfam.Papilionoideae. — Evolution44: 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. — Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manen, J. F., Natali, A., Ehrendorfer, F., 1994: Phylogeny ofRubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mes, T. H. M., Hart, H., 1994:Sedum surculosum andS. jaccardianum (Crassulaceae) share a unique 70 bp deletion in the chloroplast DNAtrnL (UAA)—trnF (GAA) intergenic spacer. — Pl. Syst. Evol.193: 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadot, S., 1994: Utilisation de l'outil moléculaire pour la reconstruction d'une phylogénie des plantes monocotylédones en général et de la famille desPoaceae (Graminées) en particulier. — Ph.D. in Sciences — Dissertation, Université de Paris XI, Orsay, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Bajon, R., Lejeune, B., 1994: The chloroplast generps 4 as a tool for the study ofPoaceae phylogeny. — Pl. Syst. Evol.191: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Bittar, G., Carter, L., Lacroix, R., Lejeune, B., 1995: A phylogenetic analysis of monocotyledons based on the chloroplast generps 4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.4: 257–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., Reeves, P. A., 1995: Evidence for the polyphyly of theScrophulariaceae based on chloroplastrbcL andndhF sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. D., Zamir, D., 1982: Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships inLycopersicum. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA79: 5006–5010.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Stein, D. B., 1986: Conservation of chloroplast genome structure among vascular plants. — Curr. Genet.10: 823–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland, K., Clegg, M. T., 1987: Evolutionary analysis of plant DNA sequences. — Amer. Naturalist130: S74-S100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudall, P., 1994: Anatomy and systematics ofIridaceae. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.114: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Ness, B. D., 1989: Chloroplast-DNA variation and multiple origins of autopolyploidy inHeuchera micrantha (Saxifragaceae). — Evolution43: 650–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, K. P., Vilgalys, R., 1994: Phylogenetic analyses ofPolemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid genematk. — Syst. Bot.19: 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP 3.1: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. — Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G., Bouvet, J., 1991: Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. — Pl. Molec. Biol.17: 1105–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., Gibson, T. J., 1994: Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. — Nucl. Acids Res.22: 4673–4680.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K. H., Morden, C. W., Palmer, J. D., 1991: Ins and outs of plastid genome evolution. — Curr. Opinion Genet. Developm.1: 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, Ems, S. C., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Rapid evolution of the plastid translational apparatus in a non-photosynthetic plant: loss or accelerated sequence evolution of tRNA and ribosomal protein genes. — J. Molec. Evol.35: 304–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurawski, G., Clegg, M. T., 1987: Evolution of higher-plant chloroplast DNA-encoded genes: implications for structure-function and phylogenetic studies. — Annu. Rev. Pl. Physiol.38: 391–418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souza-Chies, T.T., Bittar, G., Nadot, S. et al. Phylogenetic analysis ofIridaceae with parsimony and distance methods using the plastid generps4. Pl Syst Evol 204, 109–123 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982535

Key words

Navigation