Abstract
The purpose of the national faculty stress research project was to examine stress experienced by faculty in institutions of higher education. The study sample of 80 institutions was drawn from the population of all U. S. doctoral-granting institutions in the United States. One thousand twenty faculty were selected and stratified by academic rank and Biglan's academic discipline model. The response rate was 75.28 percent. In general, faculty reported 60 percent of the total stress in their lives came from work. The majority of the top 10 stressors related directly to time and/or resource constraints. When faculty stressors were compared across disciplinary groupings, more similarity than difference existed. Also, faculty reported similar degrees of stress associated with the teaching, research, and service functions, with teaching as the most stressful activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biglan, A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,57 195–203.
Buck, V. E.Working Under Pressure. New York: Crane, Russak and Co., 1972.
Burke, R. J. Are you fed up with work?Personnel Administration 1971,34(1), 27–31.
Cooper, C. L., and Marshall, J. Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health.Journal of Occupational Psychology 1976,49 11–28.
Creswell, J. W., and Roskens, R. W. The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas.The Review of Higher Education 1981,4(3), 1–16.
Eckert, R. S., and Williams, H. Y.College Faculty View Themselves and Their Jobs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1972.
French, J. R. P., Cobb, S., Caplan, R. D., Van Harrison, R., and Penneau, S. R.Job Demands and Worker Health. A symposium presented at the 84th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, September 1976.
Gmelch, W. H.Improve Management Skills by Removing Stress. San Jose, Calif.: Lansford Publishing Co., 1980.
Gmelch, W. H.Beyond Stress to Effective Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
Gmelch, W. H., and Swent, B. What stresses school administrators — and how they cope. American Educational Research Association, New York, March 1982.
Howard, J. H., Cunningham, D. A., and Rechnitzer, P. A.Rusting Out, Burning Out, Bowing Out. Toronto: Macmillan Co. of Canada, 1978.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., and Snoek, J. D.Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
Koester, L. S., and Clark, C. H. Academic job satisfaction: difference related to sex and marital status. American Psychological Association 88th Annual Convention, September 1980.
Kroes, W. H., and Hurrell, J. J. (Eds.).Job Stress and the Police Officer: Identifying Stress Reduction Techniques. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1975.
Light, D. W., Jr. The structure of the academic profession.Sociology of Education 1974,47 2–28.
Schwab, R. L., and Iwaniki, E. F. Perceived role conflict, role ambiguity, and teacher burn-out.Educational Administration Quarterly 1982,18(1), 60–74.
Smart, J. C., and Elton, C. F. Goal orientations of academic departments: A test of the Biglan Model.Journal of Applied Psychology 1975,60 580–588.
Swent, B., and Gmelch, W. H.Stress at the Desk and How to Cope Creatively. Eugene, Ore.: Oregon School Study Council, 1977.
Wolff, H. G.Stress and Disease. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1953.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gmelch, W.H., Lovrich, N.P. & Wilke, P.K. Sources of stress in academe: A national perspective. Res High Educ 20, 477–490 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974924
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974924