Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of sediment energy-texture relationships in marine and lacustrine environments

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sediments in the marine environment are generally subject to higher energy levels than those of lake systems, and lakes are virtually unaffected by tidal range which modifies beach structures formed in response to wave effects. However, despite different energy levels, the textural characteristics of both marine and lacustrine sediments are very similar. The main difference between marine and lacustrine facies is the depth range over which these characteristics remain consistent. In lakes, depth limitation may influence the development of surface waves and restrict textural distributions.

Simple textural relationships can be used to describe comparable marine and lacustrine sedimentary conditions. Sediments which have been altered by post-depositional erosion, such as lag deposits, or by ice-drop or wind blown settlement, show comparable textural modifications.

The settlement of silt and clay size particulates, in the marine environment and lakes, may differ slightly because of the chemical differences between salt and fresh water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coakley, J. P. & Beal, G. S., 1972. SEDAN — a computer program for sediment particle size analysis. I W D, DOE Report Ser. #20, Ottawa. 30 pp.

  • Damiani, V. & Thomas, R. L., 1974. The surficial sediments of the Big Bay Section of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. J. Earth Sci. 11: 1562–1576.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickas, A. B., 1970. Depositional environments of Lake Superior sands through grain size analysis. Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res., Int. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 227–232.

  • Doeglas, D. J., 1946. Interpretation of the results of mechanical analyses. J. Sediment. Petrol. 16: 19–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, K. O., 1955. Grain size of marine beach gravels. J. Geol. 63: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L. & Ward, W. C., 1957. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain-size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L., 1962. Of skewness and sands. J. Sediment. Petrol. 32: 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L., 1966. A review of grain-size parameters. Sedimentology 6: 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, G. M., 1961. Distinction between dune, beach and river sands from their textural characteristics. J. Sediment. Petrol. 31: 514–529.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, G. M., 1962. On sorting, sorting coefficients and the log normality of the grain-size distribution of sandstone. J. Geol. 70: 737–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjulström, F., 1939. Transportation of detritus by moving water. In: Trask, P. D. (Ed.) Recent Marine Sediments, pp. 5–31. Symposium Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Tulsa, OK.

  • Inman, D. O., 1949. Sorting of sediments in the light of fluid mechanics. J. Sediment. Petrol. 19: 51–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. C., 1938. Size-frequency distributions of sediments and the normal phi curve. J. Sediment. Petrol. 8: 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. C. & Pettijohn, F. J., 1938. Manual of Sedimentary Petrography. Appleton-Century, New York. 549 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. C. & Folk, R. L., 1958. Differentiation of beach, dune, and aeolian flat environments by size analysis — Mustang Island, Texas. J. Sediment. Petrol. 28: 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passega, R., 1964. Grain size representation by CM patterns as a geological tool. J. Sediment. Petrol. 34: 830–847.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passega, R., 1977. Significance of CM diagrams of sediments deposited by suspensions. Sedimentology 24: 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, B. R., 1969. Submarine physiography, bottom sediments and models of sediment transport in Hudson Bay. In: Hood, P. J. (Ed.) Hudson Bay Earth Science Symposium, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 68–53, Ottawa, pp. 100–135.

  • Pelletier, B. R., 1973. A re-examination of the use of the silt/clay ratios as indicators of sedimentary environments: a study for students. Maritime Sediments 9: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, B. R., 1974. Sedimentary textures and relative entropy and their relationship to the hydrodynamic environment of the Bay of Fundy system. In: Pelletier, B. R. (Ed.) Offshore Geology of Eastern Canada, Vol. I, pp. 77–95. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 74–30, Ottawa.

  • Pelletier, B. R., 1975. Sediment dispersal in the southern Beaufort Sea. Beaufort Sea Technical Report 25a, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, pp.1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, D. J. W. & Keen, M. J., 1976. Geological studies in St. Margaret's Bay, Nova Scotia. Geol. Survey, Canada Paper 76–18, Ottawa. 18 pp.

  • Postma, H., 1967. Sediment transport and sedimentation in the estuarine environment. In: Lauff, G. H. (Ed.) Estuaries. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. 83: 158–179.

  • Sahu, B. K., 1964. Depositional mechanisms from the size analysis of clastic sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol. 34: 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, F. P. & Moore, D. G., 1954. Sedimentary environments differentiated by coarse fraction studies. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 38: 1792–1802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sly, P. G., 1966. Marine geological studies in the E. Irish Sea and adjacent estuaries, with special reference to sedimentation in Liverpool Bay and the River Mersey. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool. 2 v., 297 pp. and appendix.

  • Sly, P. G., 1969a. Bottom sediment sampling. Proc. 12th Conf. Great lakes Res., Int. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 883–898.

  • Sly, P. G., 1969b. Sedimentological studies in the Niagara Area of Lake Ontario, and in the area immediately north of the Bruce Peninsula in Georgian Bay. Proc. 12th Conf. Great Lakes Res., Int. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 341–346.

  • Sly, P. G., 1973. The significance of sediment deposits in large lakes and their energy relationships. In: Proc. Symp. Hydrology of Lakes, IAHS-AISH Pub. 109, Helsinki, pp. 383–396.

  • Sly, P. G., 1975. Statistical evaluation of recent sediment geochemical sampling. Proc. IXth Int. Cong. Sedimentology, Nice. 22 pp.

  • Sly, P. G., 1977. Sedimentary environments in the Great Lakes. In: Golterman, H. L. (Ed.) Proc. SIL-UNESCO Symp. on Interactions between Sediments and Freshwater, Amsterdam (1976), pp.76–82. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sly, P. G., 1978. Sedimentary processes in lakes. In: Lerman, A. (Ed.)Lakes Chemistry, Geology, Physics, pp.65–89. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. W., 1963. The interpretation of grain-size distribution curves of clastic sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol. 33: 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundborg, A., 1956. The River Kläralven, a study in fluvial processes. Geog. Annaler XXXVIII-2: 127–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, W. F., 1964. Modification of sediment size distributions. J. Sediment. Petrol. 34: 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. L., Kemp, A. L. W. & Lewis, C. F. M., 1972. Distribution, composition and characteristics of the surficial sediments of Lake Ontario. J. Sediment. Petrol. 42: 66–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. L., Kemp, A. L. W. & Lewis, C. F. M., 1973. The surficial sediments of Lake Huron. Can. J. Earth Sci. 10: 226–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sly, P.G., Thomas, R.L. & Pelletier, B.R. Comparison of sediment energy-texture relationships in marine and lacustrine environments. Hydrobiologia 91, 71–84 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391923

Keywords

Navigation