Skip to main content
Log in

Hymenolepis diminuta: A comparison between young developing, and small, destrobilated worms in the rat intestine

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newly in vitro excysted tapeworms ofHymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea), 1- to 3-day-old worms and destrobilated worms from rat intestines were investigated by means of light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was found that the scolex of 1- and 2-day-old worms had shallow suckers with smooth brims, while 3-day-old and older worms, including destrobilated worms, had deep suckers with puckered brims. The posterior end of 1- and 2-day-old worms had a central cone-shaped structure not present in 3-day-old and older, or destrobilated worms. The repairing of the posterior end and the protonephridial system after excystation or destrobilation was much the same. Tissue remnants moved into the centre of the posterior end, resulting in an indentation with a pore to the exterior. The indentation and its pore became connected to the emptying canals of the protonephridial system, i.e. they developed into the excretory bladder and pore respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hesselberg CA, Andreassen J (1975) Some influences of population density onHymenolepis diminuta in rats. Parasitology 71:517–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hindsbo O, Andreassen J, Ruitenberg J (1982) Immunological and histopathological reactions of the rat against the tapewormHymenolepis diminuta and the effects of anti-thymocyte serum. Parasite Immunol 4:59–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins CA, Subramanian G, Stallard H (1972) The effect of immunosuppressants on the development ofHymenolepis diminuta in mice. Parasitology 65:111–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden RD, Specian R (1980) The morphology, histology and fine structure of the adult stage. In: Arai HP (ed), Biology of the tapewormHymenolepis diminuta. Academic Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, San Francisco, p 157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons KM (1969) Compound sensilla in the monogenean skin parasites. Parasitology 59:625–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg G (1972) On the early development of the protonephridial systems in some species belonging to the generaDiphyllobothrium, Triaenophorus andSchistocephalus (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). Zoologica Scripta 1:227–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman AH (1959) Studies on the excystment of tapeworms. Exp Parasitol 8:336–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth JD, Barrett NJ (1979)Echinococcus multilocularis: Further observations on the strobilar differentiation in vitro. Rev Iber Parasitol 39:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth JD, Davies Z (1974) In vitro culture of the strobilar stage ofEchinococcus granulosus (sheep strain): A review of basic problems and results. Int J Parasitol 4:631–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malmberg, M., Andreassen, J. & Malmberg, G. Hymenolepis diminuta: A comparison between young developing, and small, destrobilated worms in the rat intestine. Z. Parasitenkd. 71, 747–757 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00926800

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00926800

Keywords

Navigation