Abstract
A structured faculty professional development program which deliberately seeks to bring about change can yield lasting benefits for both the individual and the institution. Ten individuals who entered a program for the professional renewal of faculty between 1983 and 1987 were interviewed to discover what impact the program had on their professional development and on their contributions to the institution. Their experiences exhibit external and internal changes, with individuals being able to reflect upon their gains, contributions, and future directions. A basic model for support needed to bring about lasting change includes the elements ofpower, vision, structure, andresources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, R., Brakeman, L., Edgerton, R., Hagberg, J., and Maher, T. (1981).Expanding faculty options: Career development projects at colleges and universities. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.
Baldwin, R. (1979). Adult and career development: What are the implications for faculty? InFaculty career development: Current issues in higher education, No. 2. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.
Bergquist, W.H., and Phillips, S.R. (1975, 1977, 1981).Handbook for faculty development. Vols. 1, 2, and 3. Washington, D.C.: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges (Now Council of Independent Colleges).
Carlberg, J. (n.d.).Gordon College faculty development manual. Wenham, MA: Gordon College.
Cooper, C. (1976). Project PROF: A professional Development program for college faculty. Unpublished paper. Michigan State University, East Lansing: Agricultural and Natural Resources Education Institute.
Fink, L.D. (1987). Revitalizing the faculty: An evaluation of the professional renewal project in the College of Agriculture at the University of Nebraska. Unpublished paper. University of Oklahoma, Norman: Office of Instructional Services.
Freedman, M. (1979).Academic culture and faculty development. Berkeley, CA: Montaigne Press.
Lunde, J. (Povlacs), Hartung, T.E. (1990). Integrating individual and organizational needs: The University of Nebraska, Lincoln. In Schuster, J.H. and Wheeler, D.W., eds.Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Myers, I.E. and McCaulley, M.H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
O'Neill, N. and O'Neill, G. (1974).Shifting gears: Finding security in a changing world. New York: Evans.
Simpson, E. and Oggel, T. (1984). “Growth contracting for faculty development.”Idea Paper, no. 11. Kansas State University, Manhattan: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Joyce P. Lunde received her Ph.D. in English from the University of Minnesota. She is an educational development specialist and associate professor of agricultural education at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. She is currently co-director of New Partnerships in Agriculture and Education (NUPAGE), a curriculum project funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lunde, J.P., Wheeler, D.W., Hartung, T.E. et al. Second order change: Impact of a college renewal program over time. Innov High Educ 16, 125–138 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889656
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889656