Skip to main content
Log in

Coping styles, paradox, and the cold pressor task

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated how coping style differences affected performance on the cold pressor task. Reactions of “monitors” (individuals who prefer having information about stressors) and “blunters” (individuals who avoid cues connected with stressors) were compared, using different instructional sets. The study also assessed the effectiveness of paradoxical intention compared to more traditional cognitive strategies. Monitors and blunters were identified using Miller's recently developed Behavioral Style Scale. All instructional sets improved performance in comparison to a control condition, and individuals generally did better when an instructional set supported their preferred coping style. Paradoxical intention did not show any decided advantage over other strategies. The desirability of designing stress management programs to fit individual coping style patterns is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahles, T. A., and Blanchard, E. B. (1983). Cognitive control of pain: Attention to the sensory aspects of the cold pressor stimulus.Cognit. Ther. Res. 7: 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, L. M. (1980). Paradoxical intention. In Goldstein, A., and Foa, E. B. (eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Interventions, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, L. M., and DiTomasso, R. A. (1985). Paradoxical intention in behavior therapy: A review of the experimental literature. In Turner, R. M., and Ascher, L. M. (eds.),Evaluating Behavior Therapy, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, L. M., and Efran, J. S. (1978). The use of paradoxical intention in a behavioral program for sleep onset insomnia.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 547–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avia, M. D., and Kanfer, F. H. (1980). Coping with aversive stimulation: The effects of training in a self-management context.Cognit. Ther. Res. 4: 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, T. M., and Karoly, P. (1979). Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 179–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1961). The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity.J. Personal. 29: 334–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1964). Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In Maher, B. A. (ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. A. (1964).The Approval Motive, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., and Fenz, W. D. (1967). The detection of areas of emotional stress through variations in perceptual threshold and physiological arousal.J. Exp. Res. Personal. 2: 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gard, D., Edwards, P. W., Harris, J., and McCormack, G. (1988). Sensitizing effects of pretreatment measures on cancer chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, R. M., Ascher, L. M., Wolper, J., and Bochachevsky, C. (1984). Comparison of three cognitive stratgegies in altering pain behaviors on a cold pressor task.Percept. Motor Skills, 59: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, S. M. (1984). Pleasant and unpleasant slides: Their effects on pain tolerance.Cognit. Ther. Res. 8: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. A., Shipley, R. H., and McGuire, D. (1977). The use of external distractors to reduce pain and anxiety associated with stressful medical and dental procedures. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta.

  • Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., and Haugtvedt, C. (1982). Attention, distraction, and cold-pressor pain.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 43: 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., and Malott, J. M. (1984). Distraction and coping with pain.Psychol. Bull. 95: 516–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1973).The Puzzle of Pain, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1979). Coping with impending stress: A behavioral, subjective, and psychophysiological analysis.Psychophysiology 16: 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1980). When is a little information a dangerous thing? Coping with stressful life-events by monitoring vs. blunting. In Levine, S., and Ursin, H. (eds.),Coping and Health, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information-seeking under threat.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 52: 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., and Mangan, C. E. (1983). Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all?J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45: 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Brody, D. S., and Summerton, J. (1988). Styles of coping with threat: Implications for health.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54: 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Leinbach, A., and Brody, D. S. (1989). Coping style in hypertensives: Nature and consequences for treatment.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57(3): 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., and Lightner, J. M. (1980). Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39: 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, S., and Zinn, A. B. (1986). Psychological response to amniocentesis. II. Effects of coping style.Am. J. Med. Genet. 25: 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. (1980). Individual differences in self-control behaviors and tolerance of painful stimulation.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 89: 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, N. P., Radtke-Bodorik, L., Ferguson, J. D., and Jones, B. (1979). The effects of hypnotic susceptibility, suggestions for analgesia, and the utilization of cognitive strategies on the reduction of pain.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 88: 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A., and O'Sullivan, J. (1986). Monitoring and blunting coping styles in women prior to surgery.Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 25: 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. K., Kanfer, F. H., and Higgins, J. M. (1984). Effects of goal specificity and time cues on pain tolerance.Cognit. Ther. Res. 8: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. W., Odegaard, V., and Watkins, L. O. (1983). Benefits of sensory instruction in preparation for cardiac catheterization: A randomized, controlled trial.Circulation 68: III-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., and Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”): A trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 83: 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, L. O., Weaver, L., and Odegaard, V. (1986). Preparation for cardiac catheterization: Tailoring the content of instruction to coping style.Heart Lung 15: 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Efran, J.S., Chorney, R.L., Ascher, L.M. et al. Coping styles, paradox, and the cold pressor task. J Behav Med 12, 91–103 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844751

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844751

Key words

Navigation