Summary
The Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) program is a major step in psychiatric epidemiology because it uses a structured interview: the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). This gives psychiatric diagnoses in different diagnostic systems and can be administered by lay interviewers. However many surveys on health-related topics cannot give the time needed to administer the DIS and train the personnel to use such a complex schedule as the DIS. The DISSA is a self-administered abridged form of the DIS and represents an effort to produce a short and simple instrument for three types of diagnoses: major depressive disorder, all anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety, phobias, panic) and alcohol disorders. In this paper we describe the DISSA and give preliminary evidence about its efficiency. This will be done by comparing DISSA results with clinicians judgments, the DIS and a checklist derived from HSC. The DISSA functions in a manner similar to its parent instrument but achieves this in a shorter and less costly mode. Actually the approach by episode used for assessing depression seems to work better than the DIS. Comparisons with the checklist show a clear superiority of the DISSA for depression, alcohol and anxiety disorders but not for generalized anxiety.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canada Health Survery (1981) Final Report. Health and Welfare Canada
Derogatis LR, Lipmen RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale-preliminary-report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9: 13–28
Goldberg DP (1972) The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monogr: 21
Greist JH, Klein MH, Erdman HP, Bires JK, Bass SM, Machtinger PE, Kresge DG (1987) Comparison of computer- and interviewer-administered versions of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Hosp Community Psychiatry 38: 1304–1315
Helzer JE, Robins LN et al. (1985) A comparison of clinical and diagnostic Interview Schedule Diagnoses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 657–666
Ilfeld FW (1978) Psychological status of community residents among major demographic dimension. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35: 716–724
Kovess V, Murphy HBM, Fournier L, Tousignant M (1986) Problèmes théoriques at pratiques de mesure de la santé mentale de population. Lénquête Santé Québec. Acta Psychiatr Belg 86: 588–593
Kovess V, Murphy HBM, Tousignant M (1987) Urban-ural comparisons of depressive disorders in French Canada. J Nerv Ment Dis 175: 457–466
MacMillan AM (1957) The Health Opinion Survery: technique for estimating prevalence of psychoneurotic and related types of disorders in communities. Psychol Rep 3: 325–339
Mathisen KS, Evans FJ, Meyers K (1987) Evaluation of a computerized version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Hosp Comm Psychiatry 12: 1311–1315
Maurer KR (1985) Plan and operation of the thispanic health and nutrition. Examination survey. In: Vital and Health Statistics. Washington US Government, Print office, Washington
Murphy J (1986) Diagnosis screening and “demoralization”. Epidemiologic implications. Psychiatr Dev 2: 101–133
Murphy JM, Neff RK, Sobol AM, Rice JX, Olivier DC (1985) Computer diagnosis of depression and anxiety: the Stirling County Study. Psychol Med 41: 959–967
Myers JK, Weissman MM, Tischler GL, Holzer CE III, Leaf PJ, Orvaschel H, Anthony JC, Boyd JH, Burke JD Jr, Kramer M, Stoltzman R (1984) Six-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders in three communities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 959–967
National Institute of Mental Health (1983) Risk factor research in the major mental disorders. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 83-1068. Rockville, MD: The Institute
Radlof L (1974) Sex differences in depression. The effects of occupation and marital status. Sex Roles 1: 249
Roberts RE, Vernon SV (1983) The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 140: 41–46
Robins L (1988) Diagnostic grammar and assessment translating criteria into questions. Am Psychopathological Association 78th Meeting
Robins LN, Marcus SC (1987) The diagnostic screening procedure writer: a fool do develop individualized screening procedures. J Med Care 25: 12
Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS (1981) National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 381–384
Robins LN, Helzer JE, Ratcliff KS, Seyfried W (1982) Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, version II: DSM-III diagnoses. Psychol Med 12: 855–870
Robins LN, Helzer JE, Weissman MM (1984) Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 949–958
Robins JN, Wing JK, Helzer JE (1985) WHO-ADAMHA Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Selzer ML (1971) The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 127: 89
Shapiro S, Skinner SA, Kessler LS, et al. (1984) Utilization of health and mental health services. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41: 971–982
Uhlenhuth EH, Balter MB, Mellinger GD (1983) Symptom checklist syndromes in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40: 1167–1173
Weissman NM, Myers JK (1978) Affective disorders in a US urban community. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35: 1304–1311
Weissman MM, Myers JK, Thompson WD (1981) Depression and its treatment in a US urban community 1975–1976. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 417–421
Zung WWK (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12: 63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovess, V., Fournier, L. The DISSA: an abridged self-administered version of the DIS. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 25, 179–186 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00782958
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00782958