Summary
The migratory and foraging behavior of individually marked bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis) was studied to test the hypothesis that forage quality determined seasonal range selection. Forage quality was monitored through analysis of fecal crude protein. Ewes in the study population utilized two distinct ranges differing in elevation and possibly predation risk. Pregnant ewes migrated in May from the low-elevation winter range to lambing areas at higher elevation, before plant growth had started there. In so doing, they moved from a range of high-quality forage to one of low-quality forage, apparently to avoid predation on newborn lambs. Non-pregnant adult ewes migrated later. Most yearling ewes (which are not pregnant) migrated with the adult ewes to the lambing areas, but returned to the winter range within a few days, then migrated again to high-elevation areas in June. Forage quality was higher at high elevation from mid-June at least through July, but forage availability appeared to be lower than in the winter range. Seasonal range selection is likely determined by a combination of nutritional and antipredator constraints. The antipredator strategy of bighorn ewes does not always allow them to utilize the range with the best forage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson DA (1983) Reproductive success of Columbian blacktailed deer in a sewage-fertilized forest in western Washington. J Wildl Manage 47:243–246
Belovsky GE (1981) Optimal activity times and habitat choice of moose. Oecologia (Berlin) 48:22–30
Berger J (1978) Group size, foraging, and antipredator ploys: an analysis of bighorn sheep decisions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:91–99
Berger J (1986) Wild horses of the Great Basin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bergerud AT, Butler HE, Miller DR (1984) Antipredator tactics of calving caribou: dispersion in mountains. Can J Zool 62:1566–1575
Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368
Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N (1985) Condensed tannins deter feeding by browsing ruminants in a South African savanna. Oecologia (Berlin) 67:142–146
Fels HE, Moir RJ, Rossiter RC (1959) Herbage intake of grazing sheep in south-western Australia. Austr J Agric Res 10:237–247
Festa-Bianchet M (1986a) Seasonal dispersion of overlapping mountain sheep ewe groups. J Wildl Manage 50:325–330
Festa-Bianchet M (1986b) Site fidelity and seasonal range use by bighorn rams. Can J Zool 64:2126–2132
Festa-Bianchet M (1987) Individual reproductive success of bighorn sheep ewes. PhD dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada
Festa-Bianchet M (1988) Age-specific reproduction of bighorn ewes in Alberta, Canada. J Mammal (in press)
Freeland WJ, Janzen DH (1974) Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat 108:269–289
Geist V (1971) Mountain sheep. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hamr J (1984) Home range sizes of male chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) in the Tyrolean Alps. Acta Zool Fennica 171:293–298
Hebert DM (1973) Altitudinal migration as a factor in the nutrition of bighorn sheep. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Canada
Hebert DM, Dowan IM (1971) Natural salt licks as a part of the ecology of the mountain goat. Can J Zool 49:605–610
Hobbs NT (1987) Fecal indices to dietary quality: a critique. J Wild Manage 51:317–320
Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Gill RB (1983) Comparative nutritional ecology of montane ungulates during winter. J Wildl Manage 47:1–16
Hoefs M (1979) Flowering plant phenology at Sheep Mountain, southwest Yukon Territory. Can Field Nat 93:183–187
Holmes WG (1984) Predation risk and foraging behavior of the Hoary marmot in Alaska. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:293–301
Iason GR, Duck CD, Clutton-Brock TH (1986) Grazing and reproductive success of red deer: the effect of local enrichment by gull colonies. J Anim Ecol 55:507–515
Johnston A, Bezeau LM, Smoliak S (1968) Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of alpine tundra plants. J Wildl Manage 32:773–777
Klein DR (1965) Ecology of deer range in Alaska. Ecol Monogr 35:259–284
Klein DR, Schonheyder F (1970) Variation in ruminal nitrogen level among some cervidae. Can J Zool 48:1437–1442
Krebs JR, McCleery RH (1984) Optimization in behavioural ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 91–121
Langvatn R, Albon SD (1986) Geographic clines in body weight of Norwegian red deer: a novel explanation of Bergmann's rule. Holarctic Ecol 9:285–293
Leslie DM, Starkey EE (1985) Fecal indices to dietary quality of cervids in old-growth forests. J Wildl Manage 49:142–145
Leslie DM, Starkey EE (1987) Fecal indices to dietary quality: reply. J Wildl Manage 51:321–325
MacArthur RA, Geist V, Johnston RH (1982) Cardiac and behavioral responses of mountain sheep to human disturbances. J Wildl Manage 46:351–358
Mould ED, Robbins CT (1981) Nitrogen metabolism in elk. J Wildl Manage 45:323–334
Nelson ME, Mech LD (1981) Deer social organization and wolf predation in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 77:1–53
Nette T, Burles D, Hoefs M (1984) Observations of golden eagle,Aquila chrysaetos, predation on Dall sheep,Ovis dalli dalli, lambs. Can Field Nat 98:252–254
Oosenbrug SM, Theberge JB (1980) Altitudinal movements and summer habitat preferences of woodland caribou in the Kluane Ranges, Yukon Territory. Arctic 33:59–72
Owen-Smith N, Novellie P (1982) What should a clever ungulate eat? Am Nat 119:151–178
O'Donovan PB, Barnes RF, Plumleee MP, Mott GO, Packett LV (1963) Fecal nitrogen indicator technique for determining the nutritive value of reed canarygrass. J Anim Sci 22:1144–1152
Palo RT, Sunnerheim K, Theander O (1985) Seasonal variation of phenols, crude protein and cell wall content of birch (Betula pendula) in relation to ruminant in vitro digestibility. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:314–318
Pletscher DH (1987) Nutrient budgets for white-tailed deer in New England with special reference to sodium. J Mammal 68:330–336
Pyke JH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575
Renecker L, Hudson RJ (1985) Estimation of dry matter intake of free-ranging moose. J Wildl Manage 49:785–792
Risenhoover KL, Bailey JA (1985) Foraging ecology of mountain sheep: implications for habitat management. J Wildl Manage 49:797–804
Robbins CT (1983) Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, New York
Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Hagerman AE, Hjeljord O, Baker DL, Schwartz GC, Mautz WW (1987) Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in protein availability. Ecology 68:98–107
Seip DR (1983) Foraging ecology and nutrition of Stone's sheep. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Canada
Shank CC (1979) Sexual dimorphism in the ecological niche of wintering Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. PhD dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada
Shackleton DM (1973) Population quality and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). PhD dissertation,University of Calgary, Canada
Sinclair ARE (1977) The African buffalo. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM (1984) Do plant secondary compounds determine feeding preferences of snowshoe hares? Oecologia (Berlin) 61:403–410
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman and Co, San Francisco, Calif
Vivas HJ, Saether B-E (1987) Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the mooseAlces alces, and its food resources: an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability. J Anim Ecol 56:509–520
Walker DJ, Egan AR, Nader CJ, Ulyatt MJ, Storer GB (1975) Rumen microbial protein synthesis and proportion of microbial and non-microbial nitrogen flowing to the intestines of sheep. Austr J Agric Res 26:699–708
Westoby M (1974) An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am Nat 108:209–304
White RG (1983) Foraging patterns and their multiplier effect on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40:377–384
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Festa-Bianchet, M. Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance. Oecologia 75, 580–586 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776423
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776423