Abstract
“Prior Notification” policies have elicited fears of community opposition from agencies who have adopted a “low profile” approach in locating communitybased residential facilities. Nevertheless, data from a survey of New Jersey community care providers indicate that local government offcials express less opposition when informed of the proposed location and invited to meet with the provider Arranging to meet with local officials is most important when neighbors have leadership, since officials express more intense opposition when neighbors invite them to a meeting. The literature has already established the fact that meeting with neighbors can facilitate mobilization and thereby engender more intense opposition, both from neighbors and from local officials. Hence, the available evidence suggests that providers should meet with local officials to discuss the commnity care program but should attempt to deal with neighbors individually. This strategy is compatible with the policy of “prior notification” adopted in New Jersey.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, R. and Piasecki, J.R., 1981. “The community versus community care.”New Directions for Mental Health Sciences: Issues in Community Residential Care, edited by R. Budson. No. 11 (September). San Francisco: Jones-Bass.
Dear, M.J. and Taylor, S.M., 1982.Not On Our Street, London: Pion.
DHS New Jersey Department of Human Services, 1982. “Communications with Communities Regarding Development of Group Homes.” (N.J.A.C. 10:4).
Gamson, W.A., 1968,Power and Discontent. Homewood: Dorsey.
Gardner, P., 1981. “Community Acceptance of Alternative Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled, Mentally Retarded Citizens of Ohio.” Unpublished report to Association for the Developmentally Disabled, Columbus, Ohio.
Henderson, R. and Vitello, S. “Litigation related to community integration,”Integration of Developmentally Disabled Individuals into the Community, edited by L.W. Heal, J. Haney and A. Novak, Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Co, forthcoming.
Bogan, R., 1986a. “Community Opposition to Group Homes.”Social Science Quarterly, 67 2.
Hogan, R., 1986b. “Gaining Community Support for Group Homes.”Community Mental Health Journal, 22 2.
Hogan, R., 1986c. “It Can't Happen Here: Community Opposition to Group Homes.”Sociological Focus, 19 4.
Knowles, E.S. and Baba, R.F., 1973. “The Social Impact of Group Homes: A Study of Small Residential Service Programs in First Residential Areas.” Report to Green Bay Planning Commission.
New Jersey Senate Bill 210, PL 1978, chapter 159, 1978.
Piasecki, J.R., 1975. “Community Response to Residential Services for the Psycho-socially Disabled: Preliminary Findings of a National Survey,” presented at First Annual Conference of the International Association of Psycho-social Rehabilitation Services, Miami.
Seltzer, M.M., 1976. “Correlates of Community Opposition to Community Residences for Mentally Retarded Persons,”American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89 1.
Additional information
Research funded in part by NIMH grant #1 R198 MH 38917 01. Comments and suggestions by Harvey Marshall, the anonymous reviewers, and members of the Sorrento Seminar were most helpful.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogan, R. Managing local government opposition to community-based residential facilities for the mentally disabled. Community Ment Health J 25, 33–41 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752441
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752441