Abstract
Accessibility of linker-DNA chromatin during salt-induced condensation of chicken erythrocytes chromatin was studied by diffusion-enhanced resonance energy transfer. A terbium complex was covalently bound to linker-DNA and fluorescein molecules bound to latex particles with diameters ranging from 14 to 2470 nm were used as acceptor. The accessibility of linker-DNA to molecules with a diameter superior to 14 nm diminished during condensation, but for an acceptor diameter of 14 nm or less, no accessibility variation was observed. It can be concluded that (1) linker-DNA is located inside the fiber when chromatin is in the condensed state, (2) chromatin condensation can prevent the approach to DNA due to steric hindrance, (3) salt-induced chromatin condensation is a gradual process, and (4) condensed chromatin models containing a central cavity are more likely.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DTPA:
-
diethylene tetramine pentacetic acid
- FDL-DERET:
-
fast diffusion limit of diffusion-enhanced resonance energy transfer
- Pso-Tb:
-
psoralen-terbium complex
- PAS:
-
paraamino salicylic acid
- TREF:
-
time-resolved emission of fluorescence
References
G. Reuter, M. Giarre, J. Farah, J. Gausz, A. Spierer, and P. Spierer (1990)Nature 344, 219–223.
J. C. Hansen and A. P. Wolffe (1992)Biochemistry 31, 7977–7988.
R. T. Kamakaka and J. O. Thomas (1990)EMBO J. 9, 3997–4006.
D. L. Bates., G. Butler, C. Pearson, and J. O. Thomas (1981)Eur. J. Biochem. 119, 469–476.
J. Zlatanova (1990)TIBS 15, 273–276.
P. R. Selvin (1995)Methods in Enzymol. 246, 300–334.
A. Oser, M. Collasius, and G. Valet (1990)Anal. Biochem. 191, 295–301.
A. Oser, W. K. Roth, and G. Valet (1988)Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 1181–1196.
R. Marquet, P. Colson, A. M. Matton, and C. Houssier (1988)J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 5, 839–857.
D. D. Thomas, W. F. Carlsen, and L. Stryer (1978)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 5746–5750.
T. G. Wensel, C. H. Chang, and C. F. Meares (1985)Biochemistry 24, 3060–3069.
T. G. Wensel and C. F. Meares (1983)Biochemistry 22, 6247–6254.
G. D. Cimino, H. B. Gamper, S. T. Isaacs, and J. E. Hearst (1985)Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 1151–1193.
W. Zhen, O. Buchardt, H. Nielsen, and P. E. Nielsen (1986)Biochemistry 25, 6598–6603.
G. P. Wiesehahn, J. E. Hyde, and J. E. Hearst (1977)Biochemistry 16, 925–932.
R. R. Sinden and P. J. Hagerman (1984)Biochemistry 23, 6299–6303.
P. R. Selvin and J. E. Hearst (1994)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10024–10028.
G. Stein and E. Wurzberg (1975)J. Chem. Phys. 62, 208–213.
L. E. Morrison (1988)Anal. Biochem. 174, 101–120.
P. W. Atkins (1986)Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press Oxford.
D. M. Himmelblau (1970)Process Analysis by Statistical Methods, Wiley, New York.
R. Labarbe, S. Flock, P. Colson, and C. Houssier (1994)J. Fluoresc. 4, 315–318.
W. Saenger (1984)Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer Verlag, New York.
D. C. Rau, B. Lee, and V. A. Parsegian (1984)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 2621–2625.
A. P. Lyubartsev and L. Nordenskiold (1995)J. Phys. Chem. 99, 10373–10382.
J. Widom (1986)J. Mol. Biol. 190, 411–424.
J. T. Finch and A. Klug (1976)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 1897–1901.
F. Thoma, T. Koller, and A. Klug (1979)J. Cell Biol. 83, 403–427.
J. D. McGhee, D. C. Rau, E. Charney, and G. Felsenfeld (1980)Cell 22, 87–96.
P. J. G. Butler (1984)EMBO J. 3, 2599–2604.
S. P. Williams, B. D. Athey, L. J. Muglia, R. S. Schappe, A. H. Gough, and J. P. Langmure (1986)Biophys. J. 49, 233–248.
M. H. J. Koch, Z. Sayers, A. M. Michon, P. Sicre, R. Marquet, and C. Houssier (1989)Eur. Biophys. J. 17, 245–255.
C. L. F. Woodcock, L. L. Y. Frado, and J. B. Rattnerf (1984)J. Cell Biol. 99, 42–52.
J. Zlatanova, S. Leuba, H. G. Yang, C. Bustamante, and K. E. Van Holde (1994)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5277–5280.
B. Lewin (1985)Genes, Wiley, New York.
M. Noll and R. D. Kornberg (1977)J. Mol. Biol. 109, 393–404.
G. Sarlet, S. Muller, and C. Houssier (1992)J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 10, 35–47.
V. Graziano, S. E. Gerchman, D. K. Schneider, and V. Ramakrishnan (1994)Nature 368, 351–354.
S. Leuba, H., J. Zlatanova, and K. E. Van Holde (1994)J. Mol. Biol. 235, 871–880.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Labarbe, R., Mignon, S., Flock, S. et al. Diffusion-enhanced resonance energy transfer shows that linker-DNA accessibility decreases during salt-induced chromatin condensation. J Fluoresc 6, 107–118 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732050
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732050