Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

Clinical evidence and numerous results from animal experimentation indicate that cognitive functions have to be learned. Brain structures subserving these functions require sensory experience for their maturation. Genetic instructions are in principle not sufficient to specify neuronal connections with sufficient precision. Self-organization processes are implemented in addition which allow to optimize genetically determined blue prints of connectivity by making use of functional criteria. Thus, neuronal activity becomes an important shaping factor in the development of the structural and functional architecture of the forebrain. To the extent that this neuronal activity is modulated by sensory signals, environmental factors can influence the development of neuronal networks. Recent experiments indicate that these shaping processes are additionally controlled by modulatory systems. Both, the noradrenergic projection from the locus coeruleus and the cholinergic projection from the basal forebrain facilitate activity-dependent long-term changes of neuronal connections during development. The activity of these modulatory systems in turn depends on central states such as arousal, attention, and perhaps also motivation. It is inferred from this evidence that experience-dependent self-organization should not be considered as a passive imprinting process but rather as an active dialogue between the brain and its environment. The hypothesis is discussed that many developmental disturbances which are commonly attributed to deprivation are in fact due to defaults of the CNS which either lead to the formulation of wrong questions or to the reduction of exploratory drive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrien J, Blanc G, Buisseret P, Frégnac Y, Gary-Bobo E, Imbert M, Tassin JP, Trotter Y (1985) Noradrenaline and functional plasticity in kitten visual cortex: a re-examination. J Physiol 367: 73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear MF, Daniels ID (1983) The plastic response to monocular deprivation persists in kitten visual cortex after chronic depletion of norepinephrine. J Neurosci 3:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear MF, Singer W (1986) Acetylcholine, noradrenaline and the extrathalamic modulation of visual cortical plasticity. Nature 320: 172–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear MF, Paradiso MA, Schwartz M, Nelson SB, Carnes KM, Daniels JD (1983) Two methods of catecholamine depletion in kitten visual cortex yield different effects on plasticity. Nature 302:245–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore C, Van Sluyters RC (1974) Experimental analysis of amblyopia and strabismus. Br J Ophthamol 58:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore C, Van Sluyters RC, Peck CK, Hein A (1975) Developmen of cat visual cortex following rotation of one eye. Nature 257: 584–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisseret P, Singer W (1983) Proprioceptive signals from extraocular muscles gate experience-dependent modifications of receptive fields in the kitten visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 51:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisseret P, Gary-Bobo E, Imbert M (1978) Ocular motility and recovery of orientational properties of visual cortical neurones in dark-reared kittens. Nature 272:816–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Changeaux JP, Danchin A (1976) Selective stabilization of developing synapse as a mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks. Nature 264:705–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Changeaux JP, Heidmann T, Patter P (1984) Learning by selection. In: Marler P, Terrace HS (eds) The biology of learning. Dahlem Conferences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewther SG, Crewther DP, Peck CK, Pettrigrew JD (1980) Visual cortical effects of rearing cats with monocular or binocular cyclotorsion. J Neurophysiol 44:97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Daw NW, Robertson TW, Rader RK, Videen TO, Cosica CJ (1984) Substantial reduction of noradrenaline by lesions of adrenergic pathways does not prevent effects of monocular deprivation. J Neurosci 4:1354–1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Daw NW, Videen TO, Parkinson D, Rader RK (1985) DSP-4 depletes noradrenaline in kitten visual cortex without altering the effects of monocular deprivation. J Neurosci 5:1925–1933

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentini A, Maffei L (1977) Instability of the eye in the dark and the proprioception. Nature 269:330–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RD, Bonds AG (1979) Cortical plasticity in monocularly deprived immobilized kittens depends on eye movement. Science 206:1093–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Frégnac Y, Imbert M (1984) Development of neuronal selectivity in primary visual cortex of cat. Physiol Rev 64:325–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger H, Singer W (1986) A possible role of Ca+ +-currents in developmental plasticity. Exp Brain Res [Suppl] (in press)

  • Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behaviour. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn G (1981) Neural mechanisms of learning: An analysis of imprinting in the domestic chick. Proc R Soc London Ser 8 213: 101–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160:106–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1963) Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J Neurophysiol 26: 994–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1965) Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J Neurophysiol 28:1041–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Immelmann K (1984) The natural history of bird learning. In: Marler P, Terrace HS (eds) The biology of learning. Dahlem Conferences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 271–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasamatsu T, Pettigrew JD (1979) Preservation of binocularity after monocular deprivation in the striate cortex of kittens treated with 6-hydroxydopamine. J Comp Neurol 185:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasamatsu T, Pettigrew JD, Ary ML (1979) Restoration of visual cortical plasticity by local microperfusion of norepinephrine. J Comp Neurol 185:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschecker JP, Singer W (1979) Changes in the circuitry of the kitten's visual cortex are gated by postsynaptic activity. Nature 280: 58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschecker JP, Singer W (1981) The effects of early visual experience on the cat's visual cortex and their possible explanation by Hebb synapses. J Physiol (Lond) 310:215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W (1979) Central core control of visual cortex functions. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences fourth study program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp 1093–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W (1982) Central core control of developmental plasticity in the kitten visual cortex: I. Diencephalic lesions. Exp Brain Res 47:209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W (1986) Activity dependent self-organization of synaptic connections as a substrate of learning. In: Changeux IP, Konishi M (eds) Neural and molecular mechanisms of learning. Dahlem Conferences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYork Tokyo (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W, Rauschecker J (1982) Central core control of developmental plasticity in the kitten visual cortex: II. Electrical activation of mesencephalic and diencephalic projections. Exp Brain Res 47: 223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W, Rauschecker J, Werth R (1977) The effect of monocular exposure to temporal contrasts on ocular dominance in kittens. Brain Res 134:568–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W, von Grünau M, Rauschecker J (1979) Requirements for the disruption of binocularity in the visual cortex of strabismic kittens. Brain Res 171:536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer W, Tretter F, Yinon U (1982) Central gating of developmental plasticity in kitten visual cortex. J Physiol 324:221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent GS (1973) A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:997–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter Y, Gary-Bobo E, Buisseret P (1981) Recovery of orientation selectivity in kitten primary visual cortex is slowed down by bilateral section of ophthalmic trigeminal nerves. Dev Brain Res 1: 450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvo A (1971) Sight restoration after long-term blindness: The problems and behavior patterns of visual rehabilitation. In: Clarck LL, Jastrzemska ZZ (eds) The American foundation for the blind. Consulting Psychologists Press Inc. Palo Alto, California New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel TN, Hubel DH (1965) Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. J Neurophysiol 28:1060–1072

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JM, Owens DA (1979) Evidence for separable binocular processes differentially affected by artificially induced anisometropia. Am J Optom and Physiol Optics 56:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinon U (1975) Eye rotation in developing kittens: The effect on ocular dominance and receptive field organization of cortical neurons. Exp Brain Res 24:215–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, W. The brain as a self-organizing system. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 236, 4–9 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00641050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00641050

Key words

Navigation