Summary
Intracellular microelectrode recording and ionophoretic application of carbamylcholine (CCh) were used to compare the cholinergic sensitivity of postsynaptic dendrites of an identified neurone with that of an identified presynaptic cholinergic axon.
The axon of the lateral filiform hair sensory neurone (LFHSN) in the first-instar cockroachPeriplaneta americana was found to be as sensitive to CCh as the dendritic regions of giant interneurone 3 (GI 3). The CCh response of both neurones was unaffected by replacing Ca2+ with Mg2+, confirming that the ACh receptors are present on the neurones under test. The CCh response of both neurones was mimicked by ionophoretic application of nicotine. The responses were blocked by 10−5 M mecamylamine and 10−6 M d-tubocurarine and were not affected by muscarinic antagonists, suggesting that the ACh receptors present on GI 3 and LFHSN are predominantly nicotinic.
The muscarinic agonist oxotremorine and the antagonists atropine and quinuclidinyl benzilate had no modulatory effect on LFHSN-GI 3 synaptic transmission.
The latency of the LFHSN response to CCh was consistent with the hypothesis that ACh receptors are situated on the main axon/terminal within the neuropil of the ganglion. It has previously been shown that this region of the axon does not form output synapses (Blagburn et al. 1985a). This indirect evidence indicates that presynaptic or extrasynaptic ACh receptors are present in the membrane of a cholinergic axon.
LFHSN was depolarized by synaptically-released ACh after normal or evoked spike bursts, suggesting that the nicotinic ACh receptors act as autoreceptors. However, it was not possible to obtain direct evidence to support the hypothesis that these receptors modulate ACh release.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CCh :
-
carbamylcholine
- GI :
-
giant interneurone
- FHSN :
-
filiform hair sensory neurone
- LFHSN :
-
lateral filiform hair sensory neurone
- R in :
-
input resistance
- ΔV :
-
depolarization
- V m :
-
resting potential
References
Bacon JP, Altman JS (1977) A silver-intensification method for cobalt-filled neurones in wholemount preparations. Brain Res 138:359–363
Blagburn JM, Sattelle DB (1987) Presynaptic depolarization mediates presynaptic inhibition at a synapse between an identified mechanosensory neurone and giant interneurone 3 in the first instar cockroach,Periplaneta americana. J Exp Biol 127:135–157
Blagburn JM, Beadle DJ, Sattelle DB (1985a) Development of synapses between identified sensory neurones and giant interneurones in the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J Embryol Exp Morphol 86:227–246
Blagburn JM, Beadle DJ, Sattelle DB (1985b) Development of chemosensitivity of an identified insect interneurone. J Neurosci 5:1166–1174
Blagburn JM, Beadle DJ, Sattelle DB (1986) Differential synaptic input of filiform hair sensory neurones on to giant interneurones in the first instar cockroach. J Insect Phyisol 32:591–595
Breer H, Knipper M (1984) Characterization of acetylcholine release from insect synaptosomes. Insect Biochem 14:337–344
Callec JJ (1974) Synaptic transmission in the central nervous system of insects. In: Treherne JE (ed) Insect neurobiology. North-Holland-American Elsevier, New York, pp 119–185
Callec JJ (1985) Synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol 5. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Sydney Paris Frankfurt, pp 139–180
Callec JJ, Guillet JC, Pichon Y, Boistel J (1971) Further studies on synaptic transmission in insects. II. Relations between sensory information and its synaptic integration at the level of a single giant axon in the cockroach. J Exp Biol 55:123–149
Callec JJ, David JA, Sattelle DB (1982) Ionophoretic application of acetylcholine on to the dendrites of an identified giant interneurone (GI 1) in the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J Insect Phyisol 28:1003–1008
Daley DL, Vardi N, Appignani B, Camhi JM (1981) Morphology of the giant interneurons and cereal nerve projections of the American cockroach. J Comp Neurol 196:41–52
Dionne V (1976) Characterization of drug iontophoresis with a fast microassay technique. Biophys J 16:705–717
Duncan CJ, Publicover SJ (1979) Inhibitory effects of cholinergic agents on the release of transmitter at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 294:91–103
Goodman CS, Spitzer NC (1980) Embryonic development of neurotransmitter receptors in grasshoppers. In: Sattelle DB, Hall LM, Hildebrand JG (eds) Receptors for neurotransmitters, hormones, and pheromones in insects. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 195–207
Harrow ID, Hue B, Pelhate M, Sattelle DB (1980) Cockroach giant interneurones stained by cobalt-backfilling of dissected axons. J Exp Biol 84:341–343
Kilbinger H (1984) Presynaptic muscarinic receptors modulating acetylcholine release. Trends Pharmacol Sci 5:103–105
Kilbinger H, Wagner B (1979) The role of presynaptic muscarine receptors in regulating acetylcholine release from peripheral cholinergic neurones. In: Langer SZ, Starke K, Dubocovich ML (eds) Presynaptic receptors (Advances in the biosciences, vol 18). Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Sydney Paris Frankfurt, pp 347–352
Koketsu K, Yamada M (1982) Presynaptic muscarinic receptors inhibiting active acetylcholine release in the bullfrog sympathetic ganglion. Br J Pharmacol 77:75–82
Lummis SCR, Sattelle DB (1986) [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine binding sites in the central nervous system of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 3:339–347
Meyer MR, Reddy GR, Edwards JS (1986) Metabolic changes in deafferented central neurons of an insect,Acheta domesticus. I. Effects on cholinergic binding sites and acetylcholinesterase. J Neurosci 6:1676–1684
Michaelson DM, Avissar S, Kloog Y, Sokolovsky M (1979) Mechanism of acetylcholine release: Possible involvement of presynaptic muscarinic receptors in regulation of acetylcholine release and protein phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:6336–6340
Miledi R, Molenar P, Polak R (1978)α-Bungarotoxin enhances transmitter released at the neuromuscular junction. Nature 272:641–642
Morita K, North RA, Tokimasa T (1982) Muscarinic presynaptic inhibition of synaptic transmission in myenteric plexus of guinea-pig ileum. J Physiol (Lond) 333:141–149
Nordstrom O, Bartfai T (1980) Muscarinic autoreceptor regulates acetylcholine release in rat hippocampus: in vitro evidence. Acta Physiol Scand 108:347–353
Peper K, Bradley RJ, Dreyer F (1982) The acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. Physiol Rev 62:1271–1340
Purves RD (1977) The time course of cellular responses to iontophoretically applied drugs. J Theor Biol 65:327–344
Purves RD (1981) Microelectrode methods for intracellular recording and ionophoresis. Academic Press, London New York Toronto Syndney San Francisco
Roeder KD, Tozian L, Weiant EA (1960) Endogenous nerve activity and behaviour in the mantis and cockroach. J Insect Physiol 4:45–62
Sattelle DB (1980) Acetylcholine receptors of insects. Adv Insect Physiol 15:215–315
Sattelle DB, Harow ID, Hue B, Pelhate M, Gepner JI, Hall LM (1983)α-Bungarotoxin blocks excitatory synaptic transmission between cereal sensory neurones and giant interneurone 2 of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J Exp Biol 107:473–489
Szerb JC (1979) Autoregulation of acetylcholine release. In: Langer SZ, Starke K, Dubocovich ML (eds) Presynaptic Receptors (Advances in the biosciences, vol 18). Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Syndney Paris Frankfurt, pp 293–298
Westin J, Langberg JL, Camhi JM (1977) Responses of giant interneurons of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana to wind puffs of different directions and velocities. J Comp Physiol 121:307–324
Wilson DF (1982) Influence of presynaptic receptors on neuromuscular transmission in the rat. Am J Physiol 242:C366-C372
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blagburn, J.M., Sattelle, D.B. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on a cholinergic nerve terminal in the cockroach,Periplaneta americana . J. Comp. Physiol. 161, 215–225 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615242
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615242