Skip to main content
Log in

Tympanal membrane motion is necessary for hearing in crickets

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Sound guided through the tracheal tube to the internal tracheal spaces in the region of the cricket ear is capable of eliciting auditory neural responses in the prothoracic ganglion if the tympanal membrane is allowed to vibrate freely. If the tympanal membrane motion is prevented mechanically neural responses are abolished (Fig. 3) whereas the sound pressure in the tracheal air spaces behind the tympanum is increased.

  2. 2.

    If the motion of the tympanum, as measured with laser vibrometry, is prevented by adjusting the internal and external sound pressure, then neural responses cease simultaneously (Fig. 5).

  3. 3.

    These findings demonstrate that motion of the large tympanum is a necessary requisite in the sound transduction process of the cricket ear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dragsten PR, Webb WW, Paton JA, Capranica RR (1974) Auditory membrane vibrations: measurements at sub-Ångström levels by optical heterodyne spectroscopy. Science 185:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher NH, Thwaites S (1979) Acoustical analysis of the auditory system of the cricketTeleogryllus commodus (Walker). J Acoust Soc Am 66: 350–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill KG (1974) Carrier frequency as a factor in phonotactic behaviour of female crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). J Comp Physiol 93:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone BM, Saunders JC, Johnstone JR (1970) Tympanic membrane response in the cricket. Nature 227:625–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindienst H-U, Koch UT, Wohlers DW (1981) Analysis of the cricket auditory system by acoustic stimulation using a closed sound field. J Comp Physiol 141:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen ON (1981) Mechanical time resolution in some insect ears. II. Impulse sound transmission in acoustic tracheal tubes. J Comp Physiol 143:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen ON, Michelsen A (1978) Biophysics of the ensiferan ear. III. The cricket ear as a four-input system. J Comp Physiol 123:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel K (1974) Das Tympanalorgan vonGryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Saltatoria, Gryllidae). Z Morphol Tiere 77:285–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocke H (1972) Physiological aspects of sound communication in crickets (Gryllus campestris L.). J Comp Physiol 80:141–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton JA, Capranica RR, Dragsten PR, Webb WW (1977) Physical basis for auditory frequency analysis in field crickets (Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 119:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Young D, Ball E (1974) Structure and development of the auditory system in the prothoracic leg of the cricketTeleogryllus commodus (Walker). I. Adult structure. Z Zellforsch 147:293–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleindienst, H.U., Wohlers, D.W. & Larsen, O.N. Tympanal membrane motion is necessary for hearing in crickets. J. Comp. Physiol. 151, 397–400 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605455

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605455

Keywords

Navigation