Summary
-
1.
Six of eight male Savannah sparrows removed from their territories just prior to their eggs hatching were replaced by new individuals. While the ensuing behavior of all but one replacement bird might be considered altruistic, such behavior is interpreted as a response to an artificial situation occurring infrequently naturally. Since the response would normally be advantageous (when the female was the male's mate) and rarely disadvantageous, maintenance of the response is evolutionarily favored.
-
2.
Contrary to the suggestion that the sequential hormonal changes accompanying breeding have been selected for as a means to minimize altruistic errors, we argue that any advantage so derived would be coincidental rather than the primary selective force.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emlen, S.T., Power, H.W.: Altruism in mountain bluebirds? Science191, 808–810 (1976)
Power, H.W.: Mountain bluebirds: Experimental evidence against altruism. Science189, 142–143 (1975)
Ricklefs, R.E.: On the evolution of reproductive strategies in birds: Reproductive effort. Am. Nat.111, 453–478 (1977)
Stobo, W.T., McLaren, I.A.: The Ipswich sparrow. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Institute of Science 1975
Verner, J.: On the adaptive significance of territoriality. Am. Nat.111, 769–775 (1977)
Weatherhead, P.J.: Ecological correlates of monogamy in tundrabreeding Savannah sparrows. Auk96, 391–401 (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weatherhead, P.J., Robertson, R.J. Altruism in the Savannah sparrow?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6, 185–186 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569199
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569199