Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of experience with a brand imitator on the original brand

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imitating the look of an existing successful brand is a common occurrence in today's crowded marketplace. It was found that a negative experience with an imitator brand increased the evaluations of the original brand. A positive experience with the imitator was shown to have the opposite effect, and there was a decrease in the evaluations of the original brand. Subjects also indicated they would be likely to purchase the positive imitator over the original at only a 10 percent price reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A&M Pet Products v. Pieces, Inc., and Royak K-9 South West. (1989). United States District Court, Central District of Los Angeles, Case No. CV89-4923.

  • Bone, Paula Fitzerald, and Robert J. Corey. (1992). “Ethical Dilemmas in Packaging: Beliefs of Packaging Professionals.”Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 45–51.

  • Elliot, Stuart. (1994). “Coca-Cola Freshens Up Ad Thrust.”Globe and Mail. Reprint fromNew York Times, November 10, p. B.

  • Feinberg, Robert M., and Donald J. Roussland. (1990). “The Economic Effects of Intellectual Property Right Infringements.”Journal of Business 63(1), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzell, Phillip B. (1982).Private Labels: Store Brands and Generic Products. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, Priscilla, and David Mazursky. (1983). “A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loken, Barbara, Ivan Ross, and Ronald L. Hinkle. (1986). “Consumer Confusion of Origin and Brand Similarity Perceptions.”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 5, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miaoulis, George, and Nancy D'Amato. (1978). “Consumer Confusion: Trademark Infringement.”Journal of Marketing (April), 48–55.

  • Oliver, Richard L. (1993). “Cognitive Affective and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (December), 418–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L., and Wayne S. DeSarbo. (1988). “Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March), 495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, S. Chesterfield, Glen E. Weston, Peter B. Maggs, and Roger E. Schechter. (1983).Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection: Cases and Comments. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, Leon G., and Leslie Lazar Kanuk. (1991).Consumer Behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Louis W., and Thomas L. Eovaldi. (1984).Legal Aspects of Marketing Strategy: Antitrust and Consumer Protection Issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, James, Barbara Loken, Ivan Ross, and Tedi Hasapopoulos. (1986). “The Influence of Physical Similarity on Generalization of Affect and Attribute Perceptions from National Brands to Private Label Brands.” In Terence A. Shimp et al. (eds.),American Marketing Educators' Conference (pp. 51–56). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1994). “The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising,”Journal of Advertising 23(4) (December), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaichkowsky, J.L., Simpson, R.N. The effect of experience with a brand imitator on the original brand. Market Lett 7, 31–39 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557309

Key words

Navigation