Summary
An Evaporimeter and a ventilated chamber technique have been compared in their ability to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL) through rat skin. These techniques measure TEWL under very different conditions; the Evaporimeter measures the net TEWL under ambient relative humidity (RH) whereas the ventilated chamber employs a constant atmosphere, usually of low RH and thus measured the uni-directional diffusion of water. Paired Evaporimeter and ventilated chamber measurements were made of TEWL through normal skin and through skin whose barrier properties had been altered by tape-stripping (15 applications) or single applications of n-hexadecane (28.4 μmol cm−2). Both measuring techniques indicated the same level of TEWL through normal skin (mean 0.3 mg cm−2 h−1) and during increases in TEWL induced by n-hexadecane (max TEWL c 3.5 mg cm−2 h−1). However, the Evaporimeter was found to underestimate the higher rates of TEWL induced by tape-stripping, ie above TEWL rates of 7.5 mg cm−2 h−1. The Evaporimeter is portable, easy to use and suitable for measurements of net water loss up to 7.5 mg cm−2 h−1; it can only be used for comparative assessments of epidermal barrier function if used at a particular ambient RH. The more cumbersome ventilated chamber is to be preferred for accurate assessments of barrier function where high rates of TEWL occur.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe T (1978) Studies on skin surface barrier functions. Transepidermal water loss and skin surface lipids during childhood. Chem Pharmaceut Bull 26:1659
Baker H, Kligman AM (1967) Measurement of transepidermal water loss by electrical hygrometry. Arch Dermatol 96:441
Blank IH, Scheuplein RJ, MacFarlane DJ (1967) Mechanism of percutaneous absorption III. The effect of temperature on the transport of non-electrolytes across the skin. J Invest Dermatol 49:582
Chao KN, Eisley JG, Yang W-J (1977) Heat and water loss from burnt skin. Med Biol Eng Comput 15:598
Cunico RL, Maibach HI, Khan H, Bloom E (1977) Skin barrier properties in the newborn. Biol Neonate 32:177
Grice KA, Bettley FR (1966) Inhibition of sweating by poldine methosulphate (Nacton). Its use for measuring insensible perspiration. Br J Dermatol 78:458
Grice K, Sattar H, Sharrat M, Baker H (1971) Skin temperature and transepidermal water loss. J Invest Dermatol 57:108
Grice K, Sattar H, Baker H (1973) The cutaneous barrier to salts and water in psoriasis and in normal skin. Br J Dermatol 88:459
Nilsson GE (1977) On the measurement of evaporative water loss. Methods and clinical applications. Linkoping studies in science and technology. Diss, No 11, Med Diss, No 48. Linkoping University, Linkoping
Nilsson GE, Berg O (1975) A new method for measurement of transepidermal water loss. In: Transactions, vol III. Nordic Meeting on Medical and Biological Engineering, Tampere, Finland
Prottey C, Hartrop PJ, Black JG, McCormack JI (1976) The repair of impaired epidermal barrier function in rats by application of linoleic acid. Br J Dermatol 94:13
Rovee DT, Kurowsky RN, Labun J, Downes AM (1972) Effect of local wound environment on epidermal healing. In: Maibach HI, Rovee DT (eds) Epidermal would healing. Year Book Medical, Chicago, p 159
Spruit D (1969) The measurement and the regeneration of the water vapour loss of human skin. PhD Thesis. Catholic University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Thiele FAJ, Hemels HGWM, Malten KE (1972) Skin temperature and water loss by skin. Trans Ann Report St John's Hosp Dermatol Soc 58:218
Wheldon AE, Monteith JL (1980) Performance of a skin evaporimeter. Med Biol Eng Comput 18:201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
At this address during a period of industrial training
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, R.C., Oliver, G.J.A., Dugard, P.H. et al. A comparison of techniques for the measurement of transepidermal water loss. Arch Dermatol Res 274, 57–64 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00510358
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00510358