Skip to main content
Log in

Low frequency thresholds assessed with 40 Hz MLR in adults with impaired hearing

  • Published:
Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a group of 30 adults with impaired hearing, objective thresholds defined with 40 Hz middle latency responses (MLR) were compared with subjective audiometric measures. Frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz were studied. In order to guarantee a good frequency specificity, subjects presenting large high-frequency hearing loss were particularly chosen. The 40-Hz MLR thresholds were generally worse than the audiometric measures. The average difference was around 12 dB, but in about one-third of the cases it was between 20 and 30 dB. Although not perfect, 40-Hz MLR estimates on low frequencies can be very helpful and deserve further consideration, especially in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aran JM, Charlet De Sauvage R, Pelerin J (1971) Comparaison des seuils électrocochléographiques et de l'audiogramme: étude statistique. Rev Laryngol 92: 477–491

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conraux C, Dauman R, Féblot P (1981) Potentiels évoqués auditifs rapides dérivés. Audiology 20: 382–393

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis H, Hirsh SK (1976) The audiometric utility of brain-stem responses to low-frequency sounds. Audiology 15: 181–195

    Google Scholar 

  4. Don M, Eggermont JJ, Brackmann DE (1979) Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain-stem responses and high-pass noise masking. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 57: 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eggermont JJ (1976) Electrocochleography. In: Keidel WD and Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. V/3, pp 625–706

  6. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff P (1981) A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 78: 2643–2647

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein AJ (1983) Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component I. Latency, amplitude and threshold sensitivity. Arch Otolarnygol 109: 6–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mendel MI (1975) Effects of secobarbital on the early components of the auditory evoked potentials. Rev Laryngol 96: 178–184

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mendel MI, Goldstein R (1971) Early components of the averaged electroencephalic response to constant level clicks during all-night sleep. J Speech Hear Res 14: 829–840

    Google Scholar 

  10. Picton TW, Woods DL, Baribeau-Braun Y, Healey TMG (1977) Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolarnygol 6: 90–199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shallop JK (1983) Electric response audiometry. Adv Oto Rhino Laryngol 29: 124–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shallop JK, Osterhammel PA (1983) A comparative study of measurements of SN-10 and the 40/sec middle latency responses in newborns. Scand Audiol 12: 83–95

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stapells DR, Picton TW (1981) Technical aspects and brain-stem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear Hear 2: 20–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Szyfter W, Dauman R, Charlet de Sauvage R (1983) 40 Hz MLR to low frequency tone-pips in normally-hearing adults. J Otolarnygol (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dauman, R., Szyfter, W., de Sauvage, R.C. et al. Low frequency thresholds assessed with 40 Hz MLR in adults with impaired hearing. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 240, 85–89 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464350

Key words

Navigation