Skip to main content
Log in

Practical classification of chin deformities

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A visually pleasing chin is an important component of facial harmony. This study was undertaken to introduce a practical classification of chin dysmorphology, which can be used to guide the surgeon toward the appropriate surgical approach to chin repair. Analysis of life-size photography, based on standard anthropometric measurements, was completed on 2,879 patients from 1981 to 1991. Six hundred eighty-four patients were noted to have normal occlusion with some form of chin deformity. Analysis of this group of patients identified seven categories of chin dysmorphism: Class I, macrogenia (n = 170, 24.9%); Class II, microgenia (n = 435, 63.6%); Class III, combination of macrogenia in one direction and microgenia in the other direction (n = 54, 7.9%); Class IV, asymmetry (n = 4, 0.6%); Class V, soft tissue ptosis (“witch's chin”) (n = 13, 1.9%); Class VI, pseudomacrogenia (normal skeletal symphysis menti with excess soft tissue covering) (n = 5, 0.73%); and Class VII, pseudomicrogenia (long-face deformity producing clockwise rotation of the normal mandible) (n = 3, 0.4%). Having diagnosed the dysmorphism, logical surgical recommendations for lower face improvement were postulated. Only patients with Class II chin deformity can be corrected with augmentation. Classes I, III, and IV require an osteotomy of the chin. Classes V and VI benefit from soft tissue correction. Class VII deformity can be corrected with a maxillary osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bazin G: The History of World Sculpture. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, Ltd., 1968, pp 36–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Converse JM: Restoration of facial contour by bone grafts introduced through the oral cavity. Plast Reconstr Surg 6:295, 1950

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Smit A, Dermaut L: Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 86:67–73, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  4. Downs WB: Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26:191–212, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farkas LG, Sohm P, Kolar JC, Katic MJ, Munro IR: Inclinations of the facial profile: Art versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:509–519, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. onzales-Ulloa M, Stevens E: Role of chin correction in profileplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 41:477, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldwyn RM: The face and the psyche, a Greek concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 38:270, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guyuron B: Genioplasty. In: American Society of Maxillofacial Surgery Basic Course Syllabus Committee 1992–1993 Manual (in press)

  9. Guyuron B: Genioplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guyuron B: Precision rhinoplasty. Part I: The role of life-size photographs and soft-tissue cephalometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:489–498, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  11. Janson HW: History of Art New York Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1963 p 40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Legan HL, Burstone CJ: Soft tissue analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:744–751, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  13. McBride KL, Bell WH: Chin Surgery. In: Bell WH et al. (eds): Surgical Correction of Dentofacial Deformities. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1980, p 1210

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCarthy JG, Ruff LG, and Zide BM: A surgical system for the correction of bony chin deformity. Clin Plast Surg 18:139–152, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merrifield LL: The profile as an aid in critically evaluating facial aesthetics. Am J Orthod 52:804–826, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park YC, Burstone CJ: Soft-tissue profile-fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 90:52–62, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peck H, Peck S: A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40:284, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  18. Powell N, Humphreys B: In: Smith JD (ed): Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York: Thieme-Stratton, Inc., 1984

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reichenbach E, Kole H, Bruckl H: Chirurgische Kieferorthopadie. Leipzig: Johann Amrosious Barth Verlag, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ricketts RM: Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 9:401–422, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riedel RA: An analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 43:103–119, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS: Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial norms. Am J Orthod 78:404–420, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schendel SA: Cephalometrics and orthognathic surgery. In: Bell WH (ed): Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steiner CC: Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39:729, 755, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson ER: Sagittal genioplasty: a new technique of genioplasty. Br J Plast Surg 38:70–74, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trauner R, Obwegeser H: Surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathis with consideration of genioplasty. Oral Surg 10:677, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walker A: Beauty: Illustrated Chiefly by an Analysis and Classification of Beauty in Women. New York: Langley, 1940, pp 238–313

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfe SA: Shortening and lengthening the chin. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 15:223–230, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woolnoth T: The Study of the Human Face. London: W. Tweedie, 1965, pp 181–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guyuron, B., Michelow, B.J. & Willis, L. Practical classification of chin deformities. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 19, 257–264 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451101

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451101

Key words

Navigation