Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of a high hip center on abductor muscle function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 20 anatomic specimens with an acetabular defect (type Paprosky 3b), an acetabular component was implanted in the position of a high hip center. The vertical migration of the hip center ranged between 13 and 35 mm. It was accompanied by a lateralization and ventral migration of between 5 and 25 mm. The influence on the different abductor muscles was calculated through computer model comparing muscle force and muscle length before and after implantation of a high hip center. The increase in length of the gluteus maximus muscle and the posterior part of the gluteus minimus muscle ranged between 1% and 6%, while all other evaluated abductor muscles were shortened from 3% to 16%. The effect of the simultaneous changes of the lever arms was an increase in necessary muscle strength for pelvic stabilization from 140% to 250% compared with the original estimated strength prior to implantation. This may lead to insufficiency of the abductor muscles after placement of a high hip center. On the basis of these findings, we do not recommend the implantation of an acetabular component in the position of a high hip center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellici PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip arthroplasty 1979 to 1982. A two- to five-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1074–1085

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charnley J (1979) Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delp SL, Bleck E, Zafac F, Bellini G (1990) Biomechanical analysis of the Chiari pelvic osteotomy. Clin Orthop 254:189

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emerson RH, Head WC, Beklacich FM, Malinin T (1989) Noncemented acetabular revision arthroplasty using allograft bone. Clin Orthop 249:30–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etienne A, Cupi Z, Charnley J (1978) Postoperative dislocation after Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 132:19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraser GA, Wroblewski BM (1981) Revision of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducable dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63:552

    Google Scholar 

  7. Girdlestone GR (1947) Acute pyogenic arthritis of the hip: an operation giving free access and effective drainage. Lancet 1:419

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, Sepic SB (1977) Roentgenographic measurement after Müller total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59:948–953

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jerosch J, Heisel J (1996) Endoprothesenschule. Dtsch Ärzteverlag, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jerosch J, Fuchs S, Steinbeck J, Stechmann J (1995) Ist das hohe Hüftzentrum eine Lösungsmböglichkeit für die Revisionsoperation bei Pfannenlockerungen der Hüftendoprothese? Unfallchirurg 98:160–165

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jerosch J, Fuchs S, Liljengvist U, Haftka S (1995) Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher Sterilisationsverfahren auf den Oxidationsgrad auf den Werkstoff ultrahochmolekulares Polyethylen (UHMWPE). Biomed Tech 40:296–303

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston RC, Larson CB (1969) Biomechanics of cup arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 66:56

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston RR, Brand R (1979) Crowninshield: reconstruction of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 61:639

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kavanagh BK, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH (1987) Multiple revision for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:1144

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lachiewicz PF, McCaskill B, Inglis A, Ranawat CS, Rosenstein BD (1986) Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Two to eleven year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:502–508

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE (1980) Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:1059–1065

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russotti G, Harris W (1991) Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:587

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tetzlaff EM (1994) Wirkungskomponenten des Musculus glutaeus medius unter dynamischen Bedingungen; die Auswirkung der Trochanterverlagerung; Berechnung der Hüftbelastung am gesunden Probanden. Dissertation, University of Münster

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jerosch, J., Steinbeck, J., Stechmann, J. et al. Influence of a high hip center on abductor muscle function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116, 385–389 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433996

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433996

Keywords

Navigation