Skip to main content
Log in

A neuropharmacological analysis of the discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats were trained to discriminate fenfluramine (1.0 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task. The dose-response curve for this discrimination was orderly with an ED50 of about one-half of the training dose (0.52 mg/kg). In substitution tests, indirect (p-chloroamphetamine) and direct (quipazine, MK-212, lisuride) serotonin (5-HT) agonists substituted for fenfluramine. Since none of these compounds have been reported to be hallucinogenic and the potent hallucinogen LSD did not substitute completely, it was suggested that the discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine are not related to its ability to produce hallucinations in humans. The fenfluramine cue, like the quipazine cue, was antagonized by the 5-HT antagonists cyproheptadine and methiothepin. Unlike quipazine, fenfluramine was also partially antagonized by the 5-HT uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, and the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor, p-chlorophenylalanine. Thus, the fenfluramine cue differs from that of quipazine in that it is mediated via indirect actions on 5-HT receptors. Since the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist d-amphetamine failed to substitute and the DA antagonist haloperidol failed to block the fenfluramine cue, a mediating role for DA was not indicated. Another indirect DA agonist, cocaine, substituted partially for fenfluramine, a result which paralleled that seen with fluoxetine. Both of these partial substututions were reduced by cyproheptadine; therefore, it was concluded that these effects may be due to the common ability of cocaine, fluoxetine, and fenfluramine to inhibit 5-HT uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bueno OFA, Carlini EA, Finkelfarb E, Suzuki JS (1976) 114-1, ethanol, and amphetamine as discriminative stimuli-generalization tests with other drugs. Psychopharmacologia 46:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Clineschmidt BV, McGuffin JC (1978) Pharmacological differentiation of the central 5-hydroxytryptamine-like actions of MK-212 (6-chloro-2-[1-piperazinyl]-pyrazine), p-methoxyamphetamine and fenfluramine in an in vivo model system. Eur J Pharmacol 50:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Mello GD, Stolerman IP (1978) Methodological issues in drug-discrimination research. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillion GMB, Rousselle JC, Fillion MP, Beaudoin DM, Goiny MR, Deniau JV, Jacob JJ (1978) High-affinity binding of [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine to brain synaptosomal membranes: comparison with [3H] lysergic acid diethylamide binding. Mol Pharmacol 14:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RW, Perry KW, Molloy BB (1974) Effect of an uptake inhibitor on serotonin metabolism in the rat brain: studies with 3-(trifluromethylphenoxy)-N-methyl-phenylpropylamine (Lilly 110140). Life Sci 15:1161–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuxe D, Fredholm LO, Hamburger B, Ogren SO (1975) On the “in vivo” and “in vitro” actions of fenfluramine and its derivatives on central monoamine neurons, especially 5-hydroxytryptamine neurons and their relation to the anorectic activity of fenfluramine. Postgrad Med J (Suppl) 51:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Garattini S, Buczko W, Jori A, Samanin R (1975) On the mechanism of action of fenfluramine. Postgrad Med J (Suppl) 51:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Glowinski L (1970) Effects of amphetamine on various aspects of catecholamine metabolism in the central nervous system of the rat. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compounds. Raven, New York, pp 301–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotesman KG, Gunne LM (1972) Subjective effects of two anorexigenic agents, fenfluramine and AN448, in amphetamine-dependent subjects. Br J Addict 67:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie AJ (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine in an operant task; an analysis of its cue function. Psychopharmacology 53:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JD, Nutt JG, Jasinski DR (1975) A comparison of fenfluramine and amphetamine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 18:563–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon M, Nelson DL, Herbert A, Glowinski J (1980) Multiple receptors for serotonin in the rat brain. In: Pepeu G, Kuhar MJ, Enna SJ (eds) Receptors for neurotransmitters and peptide hormones. Raven, New York, pp 223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JA (1978) Neurotoxic action of halogenated amphetamines. NY Acad Sci 305:289–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez LL, Holohean AM, Appel JB (1978) Effects of opiates on the discriminative stimulus properties of dopamine agonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:459–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho BT, Huang JT (1975) Role of dopamine in d-amphetamine-induced discriminative responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:1085–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Koe BK, Weissman A (1966) p-Chlorophenylalanine: a specific depletor of brain serotonin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 154:499–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn DM, White FJ, Appel JB (1978) The discriminative stimulus properties of LSD: mechanisms of action. Neuropharmacology 17:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell RA, Freedman DX (1976) Stereospecific receptor sites for d-lysergic acid diethylamide in rat brain: effects of neurotransmitters, amine antagonists and other psychotropic drugs. Mol Pharmacol 12:621–630

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna ML, Ho BT (1980) The role of dopamine in the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Neuropharmacology 19:297–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Peroutka SJ, Snyder SH (1979) Multiple serotonin receptors: differential binding of [3H]-5-hydroxytryptamine, [3H] lysergic acid diethylamide and [3H] spiroperidol. Mol Pharmacol 16:687–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens R, Harris WC (1968) Self-administration of d-amphetamine by rats. Psychopharmacologia 12:158–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri L, Keller HH, Burkard W, DaPrada M (1978a) Effects of lisuride and LSD on cerebral monoamine systems and hallucinosis. Nature 272:278–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri M, Schaffner L, Pieri L, DaPrada M, Haefely W (1978b) Turning in MFB-lesioned rats and antagonism of neuroleptic-induced catalepsy after lisuride and LSD. Life Sci 22:1615–1622

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogawski MA, Aghajanian GK (1979) Response of central monoaminergic neurons to lisuride: comparison with LSD. Life Sci 24:1289–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders-Bush E, Gallagher DA, Sulser F (1974) On the mechanism of brain 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion by p-chloramphetamine and related drugs and the specificity of their action. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol 10:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter MD (1977) Amphetamine discrimination as a test for anti-Parkinsonism drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 44:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter MD, Cook DG (1975) Dopamine mediation of the interoceptive cue produced by d-amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacologia 42:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter MD, Rosecrans JA (1973) d-Amphetamine as a discriminative cue: drugs with similar stimulus properties. Eur J Pharmacol 21:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbergeld EK, Hruska R (1979) Lisuride and LSD: dopaminergic and serotonergic interactions in the “serotonin syndrome”. Psychopharmacology 65:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone T, Fincham J, Campbell B (1975) The anorectic activity of fenfluramine. Postgrad Med J (Suppl) 51:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville BW, Herrmann WM (1978) Migraine prophylaxis with lisuride hydrogen maleate — a double blind study of lisuride versus placebo. Headache 18:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DL, Ho BT (1978) Comparison of inhibition of monoamine uptake by cocaine, methylphenidate and amphetamine. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 21:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters JR, Baring MD, Lakoski JM (1979) Effects of ergolines on dopaminergic and serotonergic single unit activity. In: Fuxe K, Calne DB (eds) Dopaminergic ergot derivatives and motor function. Pergamon, New York, pp 207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman A, Koe BK, Tenen SS (1966) Antiamphetamine effects following inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 151:339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Appel JB, Kuhn DM (1979) Discriminative stimulus properties of quipazine: direct serotonergic mediation. Neuropharmacology 18:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Kuhn DM, Appel JB (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of quipazine. Neuropharmacology 16:827–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter JC (1980) Effects of the phenethylamine derivatives, BL 3912, fenfluramine, and SCH-12679, in rats trained with LSD as a discriminative stimulus. Psychopharmacology 68:159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JH, Tessel RE (1974) Fenfluramine: amphetamine congener that fails to maintain drug-taking behavior in the rhesus monkey. Science 185:1067–1069

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, F.J., Appel, J.B. A neuropharmacological analysis of the discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine. Psychopharmacology 73, 110–115 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429199

Key words

Navigation