Skip to main content
Log in

Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In rats, conditioned place preferences are produced by morphine and conditioned place aversions produced by naloxone. In the present studies, several issues concerning the demonstration and interpretation of place conditioning findings were examined in a two-compartment (black and white) tilt box: (1) the responses of naive rats to testing, (2) place conditioning in rats with strong unconditioned biases to one of the sides, and (3) modifications of the testing situation so that naive rats respond to the black and white sides with a minimum of initial bias. Experiments involving manipulation of the conditions of training and testing, use of pentobarbital, and use of a three-compartment test box helped to control for morphine's ability to produce state dependent learning as an explanation of its conditioned place preference. In addition, we examined previous place conditioning studies that failed to show aversive effects of naloxone. These negative findings were suggested to be due to the use or procedures insensitive to aversive stimuli and to the IP administration of naloxone. Finally, in the course of the experiments, novel data on general parameters of the place conditioning were provided. Dose-response curves for subcutaneous (SC) morphine (0.04–5.0 mg/kg) and naloxone (0.02–5.0 mg/kg) were established. Conditioned preferences were also shown to occur after at three pairings of SC drug, and they were retained for at least 1 month.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlyne DE (1969) The reward value of indifferent stimulation. In: Tapp JT (ed) Reinforcement and behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1981) Heroin reward is dependent on a dopaminergic substrate. Life Sci 29:1881–1886

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs DA, Woods JA (1976) Naloxone as a negative reinforcer in rhesus monkeys: effect of dose, schedule, and narcotic regimen. Pharmacol Rev 27:397–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin LJ (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In: Campbell BA, Church RM (eds) Punishment and averise behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 279–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz RJ, Gormezano G (1979) A rapid and inexpensive technique for assessing the reinforcing effects of opiate drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 10:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (1972) Morphine dependence in rats: Secondary reinforcements from environmental stimuli. Psychopharmacology 60:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas G, Brindle SD, Greengard P (1971) The route of absorption of intraperitoneally-administered compounds. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 178:562–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, van der Kooy D, O'Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P (1982) Drug reinforcement studied by use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Res 243:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Volkovskis C, Kalant H (1981) Conditioned increases in locomotor activity produced with morphine as an unconditioned stimulus, and the relation of conditioning to acute morphine effect and tolerance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1964) State-dependent or “dissociated” learning produced with pentobarbital. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1973) State-dependent learning produced by addicting drugs. In: Fisher S, Freedman AM (eds) Opiate addiction: Origins and treatments. Winston, Washington, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG (1980) Reinforcing effects of morphine microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:965–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG (1982) Reward produced by microinjection of (d-Ala2), Met5-enkephalinamide into the ventral tegmental area. Behav Brain Res 5:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi NA, Reid LD (1976) Affective states associated with morphine injections. Physiol Psychol 4:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman JF, Pickman C, Rice A, Liebeskind JC, Holman EW (1980) Rewarding and aversive effects of morphine: temporal and pharmacological properties. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman I, Pilcher CW, D'Mello GD (1978) Stereospecific aversive property of narcotic antagonists in morphine-free rats. Life Sci 22:1755–1762

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mucha, R.F., Iversen, S.D. Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82, 241–247 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427782

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427782

Key words

Navigation