Skip to main content
Log in

Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between the motor-activating and positive-reinforcing properties of d-amphetamine was examined in the place-preference paradigm. Two groups of animals were trained to associate one environment with amphetamine, and another environment with saline. Annimals that were allowed to locomote in both environments during training later demonstrated a preference for the amphetamine-paired environment; animals in which hyperactivity was limited in both environments later failed to show any preference. However, both groups of animals demonstrated a conditioned locomotor activation to the amphetamine-associated environments. Our results suggest that a place-preference demonstrated for an amphetamine-paired environment depends on the ability of the drug to increase locomotor behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulisi EF, Hoebel BG (1983) Rewarding effects of amphetamine and cocaine in the nucleus accumbens and block by flupenthixol. Soc Neurosci (Abstr) 9:121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1981) Heroin reward is dependent on a dopaminergic substrate. Life Sci 29:1881–1886

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr GD, White NM (1983) Conditioned place preference from intra-accumbens but not intra-caudate amphetamine injections. Life Sci 33:2551–2557

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, van der Kooy D, Le Moal M, Koob GF, Bloom FE (1983) Can aversive properties of (peripherally-injected) vasopressin account for its putative role in memory? Behav Brain Res 7:331–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D, Cooper SJ (1983) P-Phenylethylamine, d-amphetamine- and l-amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 95:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovino AA, Glimcher PW, Mattel CA, Hoebel BG (1983) Phenycyclidine (PCP) generates conditioned reinforcement in the nucleus accumbens (ACC) but not in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Soc Neurosci (Abstr) 9:120

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher PW, Margol DH, Giovino AA, Hoebel BG (1984) Neurotensin: a new ‘reward peptide’. Brain Res 291:119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce EM, Koob GF (1981) Amphetamine-, scopolamine- and caffeine-induced locomotor activity following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine systems. Psychopharmacology 73:311–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Nemeroff CB, Prange AJ (1981) Increase in spontaneous motor activity following infusion of neurotensin into the ventral tegmental area. Brain Res 229:525–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley AE, Stinus L, Iversen SD (1980) Interaction between d-Ala-Met-enkephalin, A10 dopaminergic neurones, and spontaneous behaviour in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kooy D, Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1983) Paradoxical reinforcing properties of apomorphine: effects of nucleus accumbens and area postrema lesions. Brain Res 259:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback S (1968) Information theory and statistics. Dover: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Volkovskis C, Kalant G (1981) Conditioned increases in locomotor activity produced with morphine as an unconditioned stimulus, and the relation of the conditioning to acute morphine effect and tolerance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, van der Kooy D, O'Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P (1982) Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Res 243:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Pert A, Sivit C (1977) Neuroanatomical focus for morphine and enkephalin-induced hypermotility. Nature 265:645–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, Lepiane FG (1982) Reward produced by microinjection of (d-Ala2), Met5-enkephalinamide into the ventral tegmental area. Behav Brain Res 5:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG, Fibiger HC (1982) Dopaminergic mediation of reward produced by direct injection of enkephalin into the ventral tegmental area of the rat. Life Sci 33:2505–2511

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1977) A critique of the methods available for the measurement of spontaneous motor activity. In: Iversen L, Iversen S, Snyder S (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 7. Plenum, New York, pp 37–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982a) Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Brain Res 253:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982b) Cocaine-induced place preference conditioning: lack of effects of neuroleptics and 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res 253:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Swanson LW, Koob GF (1983) Electrolytic lesions of the substantia innominata and lateral preoptic area abolish the ‘supersensitive’ locomotor response to apomorphine in rats resulting from denervation of the nucleus accumbens. Soc Neurosci (Abstr) 9:552

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swerdlow, N.R., Koob, G.F. Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference. Psychopharmacology 84, 163–166 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427440

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427440

Key words

Navigation