Abstract
We have constructed a computer model for simulation of point-sources imaged on two-dimensional detectors. An attempt has been made to ensure that the model produces “data” that mimic real data taken with 2-D detectors. To be realistic, such simulations must include randomly generated noise of the appropriate type from all sources (e.g. source, background, and detector). The model is generic and accepts input values for parameters such as pixel size, read noise, source magnitude, and sky brightness. Point-source profiles are then generated with noise and detector characteristics added via our model. The synthetic data are output as simple integrations (onedimensional), as radial slices (two-dimensional), and as intensity-contour plots (three-dimensional). Each noise source can be turned on or off so that they can be studied separately as well as in combination to yield a realistic view of an image. This paper presents the basic properties of the model and some examples of how it can be used to simulate the effects of changing image position, image scale, signal strength, noise characteristics, and data reduction procedures.
Use of the model has allowed us to confirm and quantify three points: 1) The use of traditionalsize apertures for photometry of faint point-sources adds substantial noise to the measurement which can significantly degrade the quality of the observation; 2) The number of pixels used to estimate the background is important and must be considered when estimating errors; and 3) The “CCD equation” normally used by the astronomical community consistently overestimates the signal-to-noise obtainable by a measurement while a revised equation, discussed here, provides a better estimator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M., Christian, C., Mould, J., Stryker, L., and Tody, D. 1980, Stellar Magnitudes from Digital Pictures (Tucson, AZ: Kitt Peak National Observatory).
Allen, C. W. 1973, Astrophysical Quantities, Third Edition (London: Athlone).
Bevington, P. R. 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Bottaccini, M. R. 1975, Instruments and Measurement (Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.).
Buonanno, R., and Iannicola, G. 1989, Pub. A. S. P., 101, 294.
Da Costa, G. S., Ortolani, S., and Mould, J. 1982, Ap. J., 257, 633.
Diego, F. 1985. Pub. A. S. P., 97, 1209.
Djorgovski, S. 1984, in Proc. of the Workshop on Improvements to Photometry, ed. W. J. Borucki and A. Young, NASA Conference Pub. 2350, p. 152.
Gilliland, R. L., and Brown, T. M. 1988, Pub. A. S. P., 100, 754.
Holtzman, J. A. 1990, Pub. A. S. P., 102, 806.
Howell, S. B., Mitchell, K. J., and Warnock, A.III 1988, A. J., 95, 247.
Howell, S. B. 1989. Pub. A. S. P., 101, 616.
Howell, S. B., 1990a, in CCDs in Astronomy II: New Methods and Applications of CCD Technology, ed. A. G. D. Philip, D. S. Hayes, and S. J. Adelman (Schenectady, NY: L. Davis Press), p. 133.
Howell, S. B. 1990b, in CCDs in Astronomy, ed. G. Jacoby, PASP Conference Series, Vol. 8, p. 312.
Howell, S. B. 1992, in Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques, ed. S. B. Howell, PASP Conference Series, Vol. 23, p. 105.
Howell, S. B. 1993, in Stellar Photometry, ed. I. Elliat, Proc. of IAU Colloquium 136.
Howell, S. B. 1995, Proc. of IAU Symposium 167, ed. A. G. D. Philip, in press.
Howell, S. B. and Merline, W. J. 1995, Proc. of IAU Symposium 167, ed. A. G. D. Philip, in press.
Jacoby, G. H., ed. 1990, CCDs in Astronomy, PASP Conference Series, Vol. 8.
Jacoby, G. H., Ciardullo, R., and Ford, H. C. 1990, Ap. J., 356, 332.
Janesick, J. R., Hynecek, J., and Blouke, M. M. 1981, in Solid State Imagers for Astronomy, Proc. SPIE, 290, 165.
Janesick, J., Elliot, T., Collins, S., Marsh, H., Blouke, M., and Freeman, J. 1984, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 501.
Jayroe, R. R. 1984, NASA Technical Paper 2396.
Jayroe, R. R., and Schroeder, D. J. 1984, NASA Technical Paper 2397.
King, I. R. 1971, Pub. A. S. P., 83, 199.
King, I. R., 1983, Pub. A. S. P., 95, 163.
Kjeldsen, H., and Frandsen, S. 1992, Pub. A. S. P., 104, 413.
Massey, P. and Jacoby, G. H. 1992, in Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques, ed. S. B. Howell, PASP Conference Series, Vol. 23, p. 240.
McMillan, R. S., and Stoll, C. P. 1982, in Instrumentation in Astronomy IV, Proc. SPIE, 331, 104.
Mortara, L., and Fowler, A. 1981, in Solid State Imagers for Astronomy, Proc. SPIE, 290, 28.
Nather, R. E. 1972, Pub. A. S. P., 84, 149.
Newberry, M. V. 1991, Pub. A. S. P., 103, 122.
Opal, C. B. 1988, in Second Workshop on Improvements to Photometry, ed. W. J. Borucki, NASA Conference Pub. 10015, p. 179.
Philip, A. G. D., Hayes, D. S., and Adelman, S. J., ed. 1990, CCDs in Astronomy II: New Methods and Applications of CCD Technology (Schenectady, NY: L. Davis Press).
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. 1986, Numerical Recipes, The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Stetson, P. B., 1987, Pub. A. S. P., 99, 191.
Stetson, P. B., 1990a, Pub. A. S. P., 102, 932.
Stetson, P. 1990b, in CCDs in Astronomy II: New Methods and Applications of CCD Technology, ed. A. G. D. Philip, D. S. Hayes, and S. J. Adelman (Schenectady, NY: L. Davis Press), p. 71.
Stone, R. C. 1989, A. J., 97, 1227.
Young, A. T. 1974, Ap. J., 189, 587.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merline, W.J., Howell, S.B. A realistic model for point-sources imaged on array detectors: The model and initial results. Exp Astron 6, 163–210 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421131
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421131