Abstract
Nanoplankton and picoplankton primary production has been studied at two oceanic stations in the Porcupine Sea-bight and at one shelf station in the Celtic Sea. At both sites, low wind conditions in June and July 1985 resulted in greatly reduced vertical turbulent mixing and a secondary, temporary thermocline developed in what is usually a well-mixed surface layer; as a result, there was physical separation of the phytoplankton within two zones of the surface mixed layer. The photosynthetic characteristics of three size fractions (>5 μm, <5 to >1 μm and <1 to >0.2 μm) of phytoplankton populations from the two zones have been measured. Phytoplankton was more abundant at the oceanic stations and chlorophyll a values were between 1.3 and 2.2 mg chlorophyll a m-3, compared with 0.3 to 0.6 mg chlorophyll a m-3 at the shelf station; at both stations, numbers of cyanobacteria were slightly higher in the lower zone of the surface mixed layer. There was no effect of the temporary thermocline on the vertical profiles of primary production and most phtosynthesis occurred in the surface 10 m. Photosynthetic parameters of the three size fractions of phytoplankton have been determined; there was considerable day-to-day variation in the measured photosynthetic parameters. Assimilation number (P B m ) of all >5 μm phytoplankton was lower for the deeper than for the surface populations, but there was little change in initial slope (a B). The small oceanic nanoplankton (<5 to >1 μm) showed changes similar to the >5 μm phytoplankton, but the same size fraction from the shelf station showed changes that were more like those shown by the picoplankton (<1 μm) viz, little change in P B m but an increase in a B with depth. Values of a B were generally greater for the picoplankton fraction than for the larger phytoplankton, but values of adaptation parameter (I k )(=P B m /α) were not always less. There was little evidence to support the hypothesis that these populations of picoplankton were significantly more adapted to low light conditions than the larger phytoplankton cells. When photosynthetic parameters of the picoplankton were normalised to cell number (P C m /a C) rather than chlorophyll a, P C m was comparable to other published data for picoplankton, but a C was much lower. The maximum doubling time of the picoplankton at saturating irradiance is calculated to be ca. 8.5 h for the oceanic population and ca. 6.2 h for the shelf population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Barlow, R. G. and R. S. Alberte: Photosynthetic characteristics of phycoerythrin-containing marine Synechococcus spp. I. Responses to growth photon flux density. Mar. Biol. 86, 63–74 (1985)
Batterton, J. C. and C. Van Baalen: Phosphorus deficiency and phosphate uptake in the blue-green alga Anacystis nidulans. Can. J. Microbiol. 14, 341–348 (1968)
Beardall, J. and I. Morris: The concept of light adaptation in marine phytoplankton: some experiments with Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mar. Biol. 37, 377–387 (1976)
Côte, B. and T. Platt: Day-to-day variations in the spring-summer photosynthetic parameters of coastal marine phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28, 320–344 (1983)
Cuhel, R. L. and J. B. Waterbury: Biochemical composition and short term nutrient incorporation patterns in a unicellular marine cyanobacterium, Synechococcus (WH7803). Limnol. Oceanogr. 29, 370–374 (1984)
Glover, H. E., M. D. Keller and R. R. L. Guillard: Light quality and oceanic ultraphytoplankters. Nature, Lond. 319, 142–143 (1986)
Hasle, G. R.: Using the inverted microscope. In: Phytoplankton manual, pp 91–196. Ed. by A. Sournia. Paris: U.N.E.S.C.O. 1978
Jassby, A. D. and T. Platt: Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 540–547 (1976)
Johnson, P. W. and J. McN. Sieburth: Chroococcoid cyanobacteria in the sea: a ubiquitous and diverse biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24, 928–935 (1979)
Joint, I. R., N. J. P. Owens and A. J. Pomroy: The seasonal production of picoplankton and nanoplankton in the Celtic Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 28, 251–258 (1986)
Joint, I. R. and R. K. Pipe: An electron microscope study of a natural population of picoplankton from the Celtic Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 20, 113–118 (1984)
Joint, I. R. and A. J. Pomroy: Production of picoplankton and small nanoplankton in the Celtic Sea. Mar. Biol. 77, 19–27 (1983)
Joint, I. R. and R. Williams: Demands of the herbivore community on phytoplankton production in the Celtic Sea in August. Mar. Biol. 87, 297–306 (1985)
Krempin, D. W. and C. W. Sullivan: The seasonal abundance, vertical distribution, and relative microbial biomass of chroococcoid cyanobacteria at a station in southern California coastal waters. Can. J. Microbiol. 27, 1341–1344 (1981)
Legendre, L., S. Demers, J.-C. Therriault and C.-A. Boudreau: Tidal variations in the photosynthesis of estuarine phytoplankton isolated in a tank. Mar. Biol. 88, 301–309 (1985)
Li, W. K. W., D. V. Subba Rao, W. G. Harrison, J. C. Smith, J. J. Cullen, B. Irwin and T. Platt: Autotrophic picoplankton in the tropical ocean. Science, N.Y. 219, 292–295 (1983)
Malone, T. C. and P. J. Neale. Parameters of light-dependent photosynthesis for phytoplankton size fractions in temperate estuarine and coastal environments. Mar. Biol. 61, 289–297 (1981)
Morel, A. and R. C. Smith: Relation between total quanta and total energy for aquatic photosynthesis. Limnol. Oceanogr 19, 591–600 (1974)
Morris, I. and H. Glover: Physiology of photosynthesis by marine coccoid cyanobacteria — some ecological implications. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 957–961 (1981)
Murphy, L. S. and E. M. Haugen: The distribution and abundance of phototrophic ultraplankton in the North Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 47–58 (1985)
Nash, J. C.: Compact numerical methods for computers linear algebra and function minimization, 227 pp. Bristol, UK: Adam Helger 1979
Platt, T., D. V. Subba Rao and B. Irwin: Photosynthesis of picoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean. Nature, Lond. 301, 702–704 (1983)
Putt, M. and B. B. Prézelin: Observations of diel patterns of photosynthesis in cyanobacteria and nanoplankton in the Santa Barbara Channel during ‘el Niño’. J. Plankton Res. 7, 779–790 (1985)
Senger, H. and P. Fleischhacker: Adaptation of the photosynthetic apparatus of Scenedesmus obliquus to strong and weak light conditions. Physiologia Pl. 43, 35–42 (1978)
Stauffer, R. E., G. F. Lee and D. E. Armstrong: Estimating chlorophyll extraction biases. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36, 152–157 (1979)
Takahashi, M. and P. K. Bienfang: Size structure of phytoplankton biomass and photosynthesis in subtropical Hawaiian waters. Mar. Biol. 76, 203–211 (1983)
Takahashi, M. and T. Hort: Abundance of picophytoplankton in the subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer in subtropical and tropical waters. Mar. Biol. 79, 177–186 (1984)
Talling, J. F.: Photosynthetic characterization of some freshwater plankton diatoms in relation to underwater radiation. New Phytol. 56, 29–50 (1957)
Waterbury, J. B., S. W. Watson, R. R. L. Guillard and L. E. Brand: Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic, cyanobacterium. Nature Lond. 277, 293–294 (1979)
Yentsch, C. S. and R. W. Lee: A study of photosynthetic light reactions and a new interpretation of sun and shade phytoplankton. J. mar. Res. 24, 319–337 (1966)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. Mauchline, Oban
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joint, I.R., Pomroy, A.J. Photosynthetic characteristics of nanoplankton and picoplankton from the surface mixed layer. Mar. Biol. 92, 465–474 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392506
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392506