Summary
Sex ratios of a population and of litters were sampled in muskrats in Ontario, Canada. Sex ratios of litters sampled from nests were male biased (54% male). Until weaning, no differential costs of producing and rearing male and female young were identified that could account for this greater production of males. Following weaning, however, male-biased dispersal of juveniles from their natal site and more frequent acquisition by females of these sites as breeding sites the following year suggested a greater investment by adult females in female young. Therefore, competition between female siblings for the acquisition of their natal site may be sufficient to result in the greater production of males. In addition, the simultaneous occupation of, and competition between, siblings and parents for the resources of the natal home range may not be necessary for local resource competition to result in a greater production of the dispersing sex. Greater-than-expected binomial variance in sex ratios of litters suggested that adjustment of sex-ratios occurred. However, we were unable to associate the adjustment of litter sex ratios with changes in maternal condition. The greater production of males and the predominance of monogamous associations between adults in this population may have lead to slightly greater variation in male fitness than female fitness. Therefore, a female in better-than-average condition may have benefited by producing more males. Similarly, a lower cost of producing dispersing males may allow nutritionally-stressed females to reduce their total expenditure on offspring by producing more males. Because these experiments were non-manipulative, maternal condition may not have varied sufficiently during this study to detect adjustments of litter sex ratios resulting from either of the above mechanisms acting separately, but the combined effects of small differences in matermal condition and selective pressures operating in the same direction may have resulted in the observed deviation from the binomial.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann J (1980) Baboon mothers and infants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Baumgartner LL, Belrose FC (1943) Determination of sex and age in muskrats. J Wildl Man 7:77–81
Beer JR, Truax W (1950) Sex and age ratios in Wisconsin muskrats. J Wildl Man 14:323–331
Bodmer FW, Edwards AWF (1960) Natural selection and the sex ratio. Ann Hum Genet (Lond) 24:239–244
Bulmer MG, Taylor PD (1980) Dispersal and the sex ratio. Nature (Lond) 284:448–449
Burley N (1982) Facultative sex-ratio manipulation. Am Nat 120:81–107
Caley MJ (1987) Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in muskrats. Anim Behav 35:1225–1233
Caley MJ, Boutin S (1987) Sibling and neighbour recognition in wild juvenile muskrats. Anim Behav 36:60–66
Caley MJ, Nudds TD (1987) Sex-ratio adjustment in Odocoileus: does local resource competition play a role? Am Nat 129:452–457
Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165
Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR (1986) Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q Rev Biol 61:339–374
Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1982) Competition between female relatives in a matrilocal mammal. Nature (Lond) 308:178–180
Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature (Lond) 308:358–360
Cockburn A, Scott MP, Dickman CR (1985) Sex ratio and intrasexual kin competition in mammals. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:427–429
Errington PL (1963) Muskrat populations. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gashwiler JS (1950) Sex ratios and age classes of Maine muskrats. J Wildl Man 14:384–389
Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488
Harmsen RH, Cooke F (1983) Binomial sex ratio distribution in the lesser snow goose: a theoretical enigma. Am Nat 121:1–8
Kleiman DG (1977) Monogamy in mammals Q Rev Biol 52:39–69
Kolman WA (1960) The mechanism of natural selection for the sex ratio. Am Nat 94:373–377
Le Boulenge E, Le Boulenge-Nguyen PY (1981) Ecological study of a muskrat population. Acta Theriol 26:47–82
Leigh EG (1970) Sex ratio and differential mortality between the sexes. Am Nat 104:205–210
Meikle DB, Tilford BL, Vessey SH (1984) Dominance rank, secondary sex ratio, and reproduction of offspring in polygynous primates. Am Nat 124:173–188
Myers JH (1978) Sex ratio adjustment under food stress: maximization of quality or numbers of offspring. Am Nat 112:381–388
Neal TJ (1968) A comparison of two muskrat populations. Iowa State J Sci 43:193–210
Olsen PF (1959) Muskrat breeding biology at Delta, Manitoba. J Wildl Man 23:40–53
Proulx G, Gilbert FF (1983) The ecology of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus, at Luther Marsh, Ontario. Can Field-Nat 97:377–390
Shaw RF, Mohler JD (1953) The selective significance of sex ratio. Am Nat 89:337–342
Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. Am Nat 121:56–66
Silk JB (1984) Local resource competition and the evolution of male-biased sex ratios. J theor Biol 108:203–213
Speith PT (1974) Theoretical considerations of unequal sex ratios. Am Nat 108:837–849
Taylor PD (1981) Intra-sex and inter-sex sibling interactions as sex ratio determinants. Nature (Lond) 291:64–66
Taylor PD, Sauer A (1980) The selective advantage of sex-ratio homeostasis. Am Nat 116:305–310
Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92
Verner J (1965) Selection for sex ratio. Am Nat 99:419–421
Werren JH, Charnov EL (1978) Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics. Nature (Lond) 272:349–350
Williams GC (1979) The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:567–580
Wilson DS, Coldwell RK (1981) Evolution of sex ratio in structured demes. Evolution 35:882–897
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caley, M.J., Boutin, S. & Moses, R.A. Male-biased reproduction and sex-ratio adjustment in muskrats. Oecologia 74, 501–506 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380046
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380046