Skip to main content
Log in

Load size and energy delivery in birds feeding nestlings: Constraints on and alternative strategies to energy-maximization

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The Orians-Pearson model of central place foraging for multiple-prey loaders assumes, as does most of current foraging theory, (i) that the quantity to be maximized is rate of energy delivery, and (ii) that the capacity of the foraging animal is the only relevant constraint on this rate. When applied to the case of birds feeding nestlings the model predicts, therefore, that the parents should select whichever load size maximizes the rate of energy delivery to the young.

We assume here (i) that the parents could alternatively maximize the rate of energy delivery to the nest (m-strategy), maximize the time available for activities other than foraging (e.g. brooding) (b-strategy), or minimize the frequency of visits to the nest (v-strategy). We further assume (ii) that the nestlings impose constraints on the foraging behaviour of their parents in that there is a maximum load size that a brood can receive, as well as a maximum and a minimum rate of energy delivery that is acceptable. These three quantities are increasing functions of the age of the nestlings.

Load size as a function of the age of the nestlings is predicted to increase initially and then to approach either the load size corresponding to maximum parental efficiency (m- and b-strategies) or a larger load size (v-strategy). For the b- and v-strategies rate of energy delivery is predicted to correspond to the minimum requirement of the nestlings throughout the nestling period. For the m-strategy energy delivery is predicted to be the maximum energy requirements of the nestlings initially, and then to level off to the energy delivery rate that corresponds to the maximum parental efficiency. As these strategies are not always compatible, foraging behaviour in a particular case may be an adaptive compromise between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. Theor Pop Biol 13:397–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenmo C (1979) Effects of addition and removal of nestlings on nestling weight, nestling survival, and female weight loss in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Pallas). Ornis Scand 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson H, Rydén O (1981) Development of parent-young interaction in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Z Tierpsychol 56:255–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner FJ (1964) Growth, fat deposition and development of endothermy in nestling Red-winged Blackbirds. J Scient Labs Denison Univ 46:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DM, Gardiner A (1979) Energetics of growth in House Martins (Delicon urbica). J Zool London 189:275–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A, Moreno J (in press) The loading effect in central place foraging wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol

  • Cowie RJ, Krebs JR (1979) Optimal foraging in patchy environments. In: Anderson RM, Turner RD, Taylor LR (eds) Population dynamics. pp 183–206. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl B, Myrcha A (1973) Bioenergetics of nestling Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio). Condor 75:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: Energetic adjustment in avian breeding. In: Klomp H, Woldendorp JW (eds) The Integrated Study of Bird Populations. Ardea 68 Vol 1–4, pp 225–252

  • Dunnet GM (1955) The breeding of the starling Sturnus vulgaris in relation to its food supply. Ibis 97:619–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala KL (1981) Reproductive cost and the sex ratio in Red-winged Blackbirds. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural Selection and Social Behavior: recent research and new theory. pp 198–217. Chiron Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau J-L, Kramer DL (in press) The marginal value theorem: a quantitative test using load size variation in a central place forager, the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus. Anim Beh

  • Kacelnik A, Houston AI, Krebs JR (1981) Optimal foraging and territorial defence in the Great Tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Killeen PR, Smith JP, Hanson SJ (1981) Central place foraging in Rattus norvegicus. Anim Beh 29:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer DL, Nowell W (1980) Central place foraging in the eastern chipmunk Tamias striatus. Anim Beh 28:772–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1980) Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defence. In: Klomp H, Woldendorp JW (eds) The integrated study of bird populations. Ardea 68 Vol 1–4 pp 83–90

  • Lack D (1954) The Natural regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DJ (1976) Form and function in animal behaviour. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Millinski M., Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gastereostus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Stairs BR, Mitchell RD (eds) Analysis of Ecological Systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1977) The role of predation in the evolution of clutch size. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins CM (eds) Evolutionary Ecology. MacMillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and test. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Hainsworth FR (1968) Temperature regulation in castus wrens: the development of homeothermy. Condor 70:121–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and brood size of nestling Great Tit Parus major. Ibis 108:313–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1979) Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal feeding. Am Nat 114:902–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1981) Optimal Behaviour: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutch AF (1949) Do tropical birds raise as many young as they can nourish? Ibis 91:430–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow DW (1958) The breeding of the Blackbird, Turdus merula at Oxford. Ibis 100:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow DW (1962) A field study of the Black and White Manakin, Manacus manacus in Trinidad. Zoologica 47:65–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM (1981) Foraging decisions in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.) Ardea 69:1–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagerström, T., Moreno, J. & Carlson, A. Load size and energy delivery in birds feeding nestlings: Constraints on and alternative strategies to energy-maximization. Oecologia 56, 93–98 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378222

Keywords

Navigation