Skip to main content
Log in

Ein einfacher zusammenhang zwischen der äquivalenzbeziehung und der unterschiedsempfindlichkeit für zwei musterparameter bei der honigbiene

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bees were trained to react to differences both in the size and in the degree of greyness of discs. To measure the differential sensitivity on these parameters, differences in size and shade of grey (“Δ-intervals”) were established such as lead to a specific choice reaction (Fig. 3). The Δ-intervals may be described for both parameters by Weber's rule (Fig. 4). The main result is the following relationship between the differential sensitivity and the equivalence curve as defined by cross modality matching. The bee treats two discs, which differ from a reference disc in diameter or in degree of greyness, as equivalent when both differ from the reference disc by an equal number of Δ-intervals (Fig. 6). The choice reactions between the reference disc and the discs of the equivalent pair are the same for these parameters. This does not hold for another parameter (Fig. 7A and B). Problems of infering from the Δ-intervals to the differential sensitivity are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abernethy, C.N., Leibowitz, H.W.: The effect of feedback on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 10, 172–174 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Békésy, G.: Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, H.R.: Luminance difference thresholds. In: Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. VII/4. Jameson, D., Hurvich, L.M. (eds.), pp 78–101. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G.Th.: Elemente der Psychophysik, Teil I. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel 1860

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G.Th.: Über die psychischen Maßprinzipien und das Webersche Gesetz. Phil. Stud. 4, 161–230 (1888)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, H.: Über die Größe der durch Phasenänderungen hervorgerufenen Empfindungsänderungen. Acustica 37, 83–93 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K.v.: Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allgem. Zool. Physiol. Tiere 35, 1–182 (1915)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J.: Die Sinne und der Prozeß der Wahrnehmung. Bern: Huber (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, E.G.: The relation of apparent brightness to the threshold for differences in luminance. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 389–399 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörmann, M.: Über den Helligkeitssinn der Bienen. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 21, 188–219 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.A., Leibowitz, H.W.: Practice, refractive error, and feedback as factors influencing peripheral motion thresholds. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 276–280 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H.: Visual scaling. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/4: Visual psychophysics, Jameson, D., Hurvich, L.M. (eds.), pp. 661–689. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, P.: Untersuchung des Bewegungssehens fixiert fliegender Bienen. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 44, 656–684 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtenbach, W.: Dressurexperimente mit Bienen: Unterscheidung von Graustufen bei konstantem Untergrund. Staatsexamensarbeit an der Fak. f. Biologie. Freiburg/Br. 1975

  • Labhart, T.: The discrimination of light intensities in the honey bee. In: Information processing in the visual system of arthropods. Wehner, R. (ed.), pp. 115–119. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienthal, M.G., Dawson, W.E.: Inverse cross-modality matching: A test of radio judgement consistency for group and individual data. Percept. Psychophys. 19, 252–260 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Linker, E., Moore, M.E., Galanter, E.: Taste thresholds, detection models, and disparate results. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 59–66 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.M.: Psychophysics of perceived intensity: A theoretical basis for Fechner's and Stevens' law. Science 139, 1213–1216 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N.J.: The psychology of animal learning. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E., Stevens, J.C.: Individual brightness functions. Percept. Psychophys. 1, 17–24 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E.: Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York, London: Academic Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashhour, M., Hosman, J.: On the new “psychophysical law”: A validation study. Percept. Psychophys. 3, 367–375 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.L.: Visual size difference discrimination: Effect of disc size and retinal locus. Percept. Psychophys. 6, 160–162 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E.B.: The validity of the just noticeable difference as a unit of psychological magnitude. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 36, 172–175 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H.: Difference threshold for stimulus length under simultaneous and nonsimultaneous viewing conditions. Percept. Psychophys. 2, 201–207 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronacher, B.: Äquivalenz zwischen Größen- und Helligkeitsunterschieden im Rahmen der visuellen Wahrnehmung der Honigbiene. Biol. Cybernetics 32, 63–75 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronacher, B.: Beitrag einzelner Parameter zum wahrnehmungsgemäßen Unterschied von zusammengesetzten Reizen bei der Honigbiene. Biol. Cybernetics 32, 77–83 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, S.J., Markley, R.P.: Subject differences in crossmodality matches: Percept. Psychophys. 9, 115–117 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 64, 153–181 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: Cross modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration and electric shock. J. Exp. Psychol. 57, 201–209 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science 133, 80–86 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S., Guirao, M.: Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 177–186 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: On predicting exponents for cross-modality matches. Percept. Psychophys. 6, 251–256 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchowerskyj, W.: Untersuchungen über die subjektive Bewertung von Unterschieden zwischen akustischen Signalen. Dissertation and der TU München, 1976

  • Suchowerskyj, W.: Beurteilung von Unterschieden zwischen aufeinanderfolgenden Schallen. Acustica 38, 131–139 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, R.: On the exponents in Stevens law and the constant in Ekmans law. Psychol. Rev. 78, 71–80 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Über ein Äquivalenzgesetz für Intervalle akustischer Empfindungsgrößen. Kybernetik 5, 127–133 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Psychoacoustic evaluation of musical sounds. Percept. Psychophys. 23, 483–492 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.: The visual intensity discrimination of the honey bee. J. Gen. Physiol. 16, 407–422 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E., Feldtkeller, R.: Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Hirzel 1967

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronacher, B. Ein einfacher zusammenhang zwischen der äquivalenzbeziehung und der unterschiedsempfindlichkeit für zwei musterparameter bei der honigbiene. Biol. Cybernetics 36, 51–61 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337022

Navigation