Skip to main content
Log in

Pseudoterminalisation, terminalisation, and non-chiasmate modes of terminal association

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terminal associations occur commonly between meiotic homologues of the two smallest (S10, S11) chromosomes in the northern race of Cryptobothrus chrysophorus when they are either heterozygous or homozygous for distal supernumerary heterochromatic segments. A detailed examination of the origin and behaviour of these associations provides convincing evidence that they are non-chiasmate in character and so cannot be explained by either pseudoterminalisation or terminalisation. The same is true of the terminal associations involved in the persistent pseudomultiples that develop between non-homologues of Heteropternis obscurella when one or both of these carry distal heterochromatic segments. In both situations the C-bands involved in such terminal associations are entire and are never interrupted by non-banded material. In Cryptobothrus, similar associations can also develop between centromere regions when these are heterozygous or homozygous for proximal supernumerary heterochromatic segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ceremeno MC, Orellana J, Lacadena JR (1984) Evidence of non-chiasmate bonds at metaphase I in inbred rye. Can J Genet Cytol 26:409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington CD (1932) Recent advances in cytology. Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Larveng L, Lee BH (1984) Polytene chromosomal variability of Bilobella aurantica (Collembola) from a Sainte Baume population (France). Caryologia 37:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • John B (1976) Myths and mechanisms of meiosis. Chromosoma 54:295–325

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Claridge (1974) Chromosome variation in British populations of Oncopsis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Chromosoma 46:77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, King M (1977) Heterochromatin variation in Cryptobothrus chrysophorus. II. Patterns of C-banding. Chromosoma 65:59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, King M (1982) Meiotic effects of supernumerary heterochromatin in Heteropternis obscurella. Chromosoma 85:39–65

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, King M (1985) The interrelationship between heterochromatin distribution and chiasma distribution. Genetica (in press)

  • Jones GH (1978) Giemsa C-banding of rye meiotic chromosomes and the nature of “terminal chiasmata”. Chromosoma 66:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GH, Tease C (1984) Analysis of exchanges in differentially stained meiotic chromosomes of Locusta migratoria after BrdU substitution and FPG staining. IV. The nature of ‘terminal associations’. Chromosoma 89:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda N, Kato H (1980) Analysis of crossing over in mouse meiotic cells by BrdU labelling technique. Chromosoma 78:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Tease C, Jones GH (1978) Analysis of exchanges in differentially stained meiotic chromosomes of Locusta migratoria after BrdU substitution and FPG staining. I. Crossover exchanges in monochiasmate bivalents. Chromosoma 69:163–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, B., King, M. Pseudoterminalisation, terminalisation, and non-chiasmate modes of terminal association. Chromosoma 92, 89–99 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328460

Keywords

Navigation