Skip to main content
Log in

Resource partitioning by mammalian herbivores in the high Arctic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Willow (Salix arctica) and sedges (Carex stans and Eriophorum triste) were the dominant plants available as forage for herbivores in the high Arctic of Greenland. Willow leaves were of high quality as forage in early stages, of phenology, but crude protein and digestibility declined markedly by late stages whereas sedges, remained high in forage quality throughout the growing season. Densities of fecal pellets indicated that muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) made heaviest use of sedge-dominated vegetation types in both winter and summer, although increased use of willow communities was observed in early summer. Hares (Lepus arcticus) favored willow-dominated communities in both winter and summer. Evidence of collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) winter use was mainly in willow-dominated communities where snow had accumulated, whereas in summer they were present in drier habitas dominated by willows, but with greater plant diversity. Analyses of plant tissues in feces indicated that graminoids composed over 60% of the diet of muskoxen in winter and over 40% in summer. Willows were of nearly equal importance in the muskox diet in summer, and forbs, Dryas integrifolia, and moss collectively composed over 20% of the diet in both summer and winter. Grass accounted for nearly 50% of the diet of hares in both summer and winter, with willows, forbs, and moss accounting for most of the remainder. Willows and graminoids dominated the diet of lemmings, with willows being somewhat more important in summer and graminoids in winter. Moss was a noteworthy dietary component of lemmings. Differences in body and digestive-tract morphology among the three mammalian herbivores account for differences in locomotive efficiency, predator avoidance, and foraging efficiency which interact with vegetation quality, density, and patchiness. The resulting patterns of use of the landscape result in minimal overlap in use of forage resources and help to explain the distribution and co-existence of high Arctic herbivores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batzli GO, Cole FR (1979) Nutritional ecology of microtine rodents: digestibility of forage. J Mammal 60:740–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Batzli GO, Jung HG (1980) Nutritional ecology of microtine rodents: resource utilization near Atkasook, Alaska. Arct Alp Res 12:483–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay C (1992) A phytogeographical study of the vascular plants of northern Greenland - north of 74° northern latitude. Medd Grøn Biosci 36:1–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell DJ (1973) The mechanics and analysis of faecal counts for deer census in New Zealand. NZ For Serv Rep 124:1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1984) Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory. Oecologia 61:150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennike O, Higgins AK, Kelly M (1989) Mammals of central North Greenland. Pol Rec 25:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Boertmann D, Forchhammer M (1992) A review of muskox observations from North and Northeast Greenland. Greenland Environ Res Inst Rep Ser 4:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Provenza FD, Pastor J, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP, Toit JT du (1991) Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1981) Risk-sensitivity and foraging groups. Ecology 62:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Pupul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes PR, Elander M, Ericson M (1986) The wolf (Canis lupus) in Greenland: A historical review and present status. Arctic 39:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz R, Anderson OGN (1984) Status over dyre - og plantelivet i Nordgrønland. Del 1: Pattedyr og Fugle, Danbiu Aps. Danmarks Biologiske Undersøgelsen, Copenhagen (in Danish)

  • Flux JEC (1970) Life history of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. J Zool London 161:75–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller WA, Martell AM, Smith RFC, Speller SW (1977) Biology and secondary production of Dicrostonyx groenlandicus on Truelove Lowland. In: Bliss LC (ed) Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, Canada: A high arctic ecosystem. University Alberta Press, Edmonton, pp 437–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths M, Davies D (1963) The role of soft pellets in the production of lactic acid in the rabbit stomach. J Nutrition 80:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard DC (1992) The effect of wolf predation and snow cover on musk-ox group size. Am Nat 139:190–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: A comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert BA (1974) Estimated productivity of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) on northwestern Devon Island, NWT. MS thesis, University Manitoba

  • Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1987) The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 56:989–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1986) Latitudinal variation in foraging strategies. In: Gudmundsson O (ed) Grazing research at northern latitudes. Plenum, New York, pp 237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1990) Variation in quality of caribou and reindeer forage plants associated with season, plant part, and phenology. Rangifer, Spec Issue 3:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR, Bay C (1990) Foraging dynamics of muskoxen in PearyLand, northern Greenland. Holarct Ecol 13:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR, Bay C (1991) Diet selection by vertebrate herbivores in the high arctic of Greenland. Holarct Ecol 14:132–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR, Meldgaard M, Fancy SG (1987) Factors determining leg length in Rangifer tarandus. J Mammal 68:642–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth E (1967) Archaeology of the musk-ox way. (École Pratique des Hautes Études-Sorbonne), Contributions du Centre d'Études Arctiques et Finno-Scandinaves, Paris 5

  • McNair JN (1982) Optimal giving-up times and the marginal value theorem. Am Nat 119:511–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Meldgaard M (1986) The Greenland caribou - zoogeography, taxonomy, and population dynamics. Medd Grøn Biosci 20:1–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (1985) Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. Anim Behav 33:993–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff DJ (1968) The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review. J Wildl Manage 32:597–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen CA (1991) Pathophysiology of infections by the gastric trichostrongylid Obelsicoides in a rabbit model system. PhD thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes EJ, Harmsen R, Eberl C (1992) Sex, age, and seasonal differences in the diets and activity budgets of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Can J Zool 70:605–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GR (1977) Morphology, reproduction, diet, and behavior of the arctic hare (Lepus arcticus monstrabilis) on Axel Heiberg Island, Northwest Territories. Can Field Nat 91:8–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GR, Ross RK (1976) Summer habitat use by muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) in the Canadian High Arctic. Polarforschung 46:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomonsen F (1950) The birds of Greenland. Gitz-Johansen, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide, vols 1 and 2, Version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1986) Resource partitioning. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology. Blackwell Scientific, London, pp 91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RFC, Wang LCH (1977) Arctic hares on Truelove Loveland. In: Bliss LC (ed) Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, Canada: A high arctic ecosystem. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, pp 461–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Staaland H, Jacobsen E, White RG (1979) Comparison of the digestive tract in Svalbard and Norwegian reindeer. Arct Alp Res 11:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Staaland H, Thing H (1991) Distribution of nutrients and minerals in the alimentary tract of muskoxen, Ovibos moschatus. Comp Biochem Physiol 98:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J, Robinson S (1986) Guilds and their utility in ecology. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology. Blackwell Scientific, London, pp 65–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Thing H, Klein DR, Jingfors K, Holt S (1987) Ecology of muskoxen in Jameson Land, northeast Greenland. Holarct Ecol 10:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DC, Edmonds JE (1984) Competition between caribou and muskoxen, Melville Island, NWT, Canada. Biol Pap Univ Alaska Spec Rep 4:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DC, Kroeger P (1980) In vitro digestibilities of plants in rumen fluids of Peary caribou. Arctic 33:757–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd JW, Hansen RM (1973) Plant fragments in the feces of bighorns as indicators of food habits. J Wildl Manage 37:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O&B Books, Corvallis, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, D.R., Bay, C. Resource partitioning by mammalian herbivores in the high Arctic. Oecologia 97, 439–450 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325880

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325880

Key words

Navigation