Skip to main content
Log in

Trophic interactions and habitat segregation between competing Daphnia species

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two commonly coexisting species of Daphnia segregate by habitat in many stratified lakes. Daphnia pulicaria is mostly found in the hypolimnion whereas D. galeata mendotae undergoes diel vertical migration between the hypolimnion and the epilimnion. I examined how habitat segregation between these two potentially competing species might be affected by trophic interactions with their resources and predators by performing a field experiment in deep enclosures in which I manipulated fish predation, nutrient levels, and the density of epilimnetic Daphnia. The results of the experiment indicate that habitat use by D. pulicaria can be jointly regulated by competition for food from epilimnetic Daphnia and predation by fishes. Patterns of habitat segregation between the two Daphnia species were determined by predation by fish but not by nutrient levels: The removal of epilimnetic fish predators resulted in higher zooplankton and lower epilimnetic phytoplankton densities and allowed D. pulicaria to expand its habitat distribution into the epilimnion. In contrast, increased resource productivity resulted in higher densities of both Daphnia species but did not affect phytoplankton levels or habitat use by Daphnia. The two species exhibit a trade-off in their ability to exploit resources and their susceptibility to predation by fish. D. g. mendotae (the less susceptible species) may thus restrict D. pulicaria (the better resource exploiter) from the epilimnion when fish are common due to lower minimum resource requirements than those needed by D. pulicaria to offset the higher mortality rate imposed by selective epilimnetic fish predators. D. g. mendotae does not appear to have this effect in the absence of fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz Z, Grygirek E, Herzig A, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Kurasawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T (1976) A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw J Zool 24:419–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Rosenzweig M (1986) Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments. J Theor Biol 123: 151–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns C (1972) Some results and comments on investigations carried out in Fuller Pond, Connecticut, from 27 May 1968 to 17 November 1968. Report to the Board of Trustees of Pond Mountain Natural Area

  • Dodson S (1988) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-avoidance behavior in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 33: 1431–1439

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio RM, Bowers J, Lehman J (1986) Food web manipulations influence grazer control of phytoplankton growth rates in Lake Michigan. J Plankt Res 9: 891–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser S, Greenhouse S (1958) An extension of Box's result on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stats 29: 885

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller W (1986) Diurnal vertical migration of zooplankton in a temperate great lake (L. Constance): A starvation avoidance mechanism: Arch Hydrobiol [S] 74: 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill J, Hafs H (1971) Analysis of repeated measures of animals. J Anim Sci 33: 331–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam J, Frazer D (1989) Predation hazard and habitat selection: Implications for population structure and patterns of resource depletion. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size structured populations: Ecology and Evolution. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg New York pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz M (1986) Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton. Nature 320: 746–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillard RL, Lorenzen C (1972) Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide C. J Phycol 8: 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Chester ST (1986) Analysis of repeated measures experiments. Ecology 67: 251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DJ, Werner EE (1977) Seasonal distribution and abundance of fishes in the littoral zone of a Michigan lake. Trans Am Fish Soc 106: 545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney SI (1978) Some observations on the use of the in vivo fluorescence technique to determine chlorophyll-a in natural populations and cultures of freshwater phytoplankton. Freshw Biol 8: 115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenicke R, Goldman C (1987) Resource dynamics and seasonal changes in competitive interactions among three cladoceran species. J Plankt Res 9: 397–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen GH, Jakobsen P (1987) The effects of food limitation on vertical migration in Daphnia longispina. Limnol Oceanogr 32: 873–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot WC, DeMott WR (1984) Food web dynamics: Dependent chains and vaulting. In: Meyers DG, Strickler JR (eds) Trophic Interactions Within Aquatic Ecosystems. AAAS Selected Symposium 85, pp 347–383

  • Kerfoot WC, DeMott WR, DeAngelis DL (1985) Interactions among cladocerans: Food limitation and exploitative competition. Arch Hydrobiol Bewih Ergebn Limnol 21: 431–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer D (1973) The in vivo measurement of Chlorophyll by fluorometry. In: Stevenson L, Colwell R (eds) Estuarine Microbial Ecology. Univ. S. Carolina Press

  • Kratz T, Frost T, Magnuson J (1987) Inferences from spacial and temporal variability in ecosystems: long-term zooplankton data from lakes. Am Nat 129: 830–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane P (1975) The dynamics of aquatic systems: a comparative study of the structure of four zooplankton communities. Ecol Monogr 45: 307–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (1988) Habitat structure and trophic interactions in freshwater plankton communities. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University

  • Leibold MA (1989) Resource edibility and consumer-resource interactions in predation and productivity gradients. Am Nat 134: 922–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (1990) Resources and predation can affect the vertical distributions of zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 35: 938–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Tessier AJ (1991) Contrasting patterns of body size for Daphnia species that segregate by habitat. Oecologia

  • Lynch M (1979) Predation, competition and zooplankton community structure: An experimental study. Limnol Oceanogr 24: 253–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz JC, Likens GE (1975) Niche analysis of a zooplankton community. Science 190: 1000–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE (1978) Experimental studies on factors limiting colonization by Daphnia pulex Leydig of coastal montane lakes in British Columbia. Can J Zool 56: 2498–2507

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE (1981) Impact of Chaoborus predation upon the structure and dynamics of a crustacean zooplankton community. Oecologia 48: 164–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE, Peacock A (1980) Breaking the bottleneck: Interactions of invertebrate predators and nutrients in oligotrophic lakes. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Ecology and Evolution of Zooplankton Communities. New England Univ. Press, Hanover, pp 715–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW, Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ (1988) Growth patterns in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus) sunfish: environmental variation and the importance of ontogenetic niche shifts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45: 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Price M (1986) Structure of desert rodent communities: a critical review of questions and approaches. Am Zool 26: 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1985) User's guide. Version 5 Edition. Cary, N.C.

  • Schoener T (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T (1986) Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: a new reductionism? Am Zool 26: 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1980) The coexistence of three species of Daphnia in the Klostersee: I. Field studies on the dynamics of reproduction. Oecologia 45: 117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1984) Are there allelopathic interactions in zooplankton? Laboratory experiments with Daphnia. Oecologia 62: 94–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. 2nd edition. Freeman and Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich HB, Lampert W (1981) Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton. Nature 293: 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich HB, Lampert W (1984) Growth and reproduction of migrating and non-migrating Daphnia species under stimulated food and temperature conditions of diurnal vertical migration. Oecologia 61: 192–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappa D (1965) The dynamics of the association of six limnetic species of Daphnia in Aziscoos Lake, Maine. Ecol Monog 35: 395–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier AJ (1986) Comparative population regulation of two planktonic cladocera (Holopedium gibberum and Daphnia catawba). Ecology 67: 285–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier AJ, Consolatti NL (1989) Variation in offspring size in Daphnia and consequences for individual fitness. Oikos 56: 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier AJ, Welser J (1991) Cladoceran assemblages, seasonal succession and the importance of a hypolimnetic refuge. Freshw Biology (in press)

  • Threlked S (1979a) The midsummer dynamics of two Daphnia species in Wintergreen Lake, Michigan. Ecology 60: 165–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Threlkeld S (1979b) Estimating cladoceran birth rates: the importance of egg mortality and the egg age distribution. Limnol Oceanogr 24: 601–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Threlkeld S (1980) Habitat selection and population growth of two cladocerans in seasonal environments. In: Kerfoot W. (ed). Ecology and Evolution of Zooplankton Communities, Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, N.H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam J (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size structured populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15: 393–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RG (1983) Limnology. 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret T (1980) Predation and Freshwater Communities. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leibold, M.A. Trophic interactions and habitat segregation between competing Daphnia species. Oecologia 86, 510–520 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318317

Key words

Navigation