Skip to main content
Log in

The first born, their dispersal, and vole cycles

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

On the basis of some empirical data and the existing theory of vole cycles, a new hypothesis is proposed. It explains cyclicity as an effect of obligatory dispersal of the first seasonal cohort of young (Y1) from their natal (optimal) habitats into vacant (suboptimal) habitats. This behaviour could evolve, because it increases contribution of genetic lineages with dispersing Y1, to subsequent generation. It is assumed that the dispersal of Y1 is common among vole species, it does not change during consecutive phases of the cycle, and it does not vary between cyclic and non-cyclic populations. It results in multiannual cycles only under a certain set of spatial and climatic conditions, which are discussed in a paper. Otherwise it results in annual dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z, Tracy CR (1979) Population biology of a non-cyclic population of praire voles and a hypothesis on the role of migration in regulating microtine cycles. Ecology 60: 349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson PK (1970) Ecological structure and gene flow in small mammals. Symp Zool Soc Lond 26: 299–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondrup-Nielsen S, Ims RA (1988) Predicting stable and cyclic populations of Clethrionomys. Oikos 52: 178–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Finerty J (1980) Vole population cycles: a case of kin-selection? Oecologia 45: 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty D (1967) The natural selection of self-regulatory behaviour in animal populations. Proc Ecol Soc Australia 2: 51–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S (1987) Predation and noncyclicity in a microtine population in southern Sweden. Oikos 50: 347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S, Göransson G, Hansson L, Högstedt G, Liberg O, Nilsson IN, Nilsson T, von Schantz T, Sylven' M (1983) Predation as an regulating factor in small rodents in southern Sweden. Oikos 40: 36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller WA (1984) Demography of a subarctic population of Clethrionomys gapperi: can winter mortality be predicted? Carnegie Mus Nat Hist Spec Publ 10: 51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1980) Island populations of rodents: their organization and functioning. Biol Rev 55: 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1988) The role of dispersal in models of small rodent population dynamics. Oikos 52: 219–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1989) Individuals and populations of the bank vole in optimal, suboptimal and insular habitats. J Anim Ecol 58: 237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1990) Dispersal in rodents: do female residents benefit from dispersal of their kin? J Anim Ecol (in press)

  • Hansson L (1977) Spatial dynamics of field voles Microtus agrestis in heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos 29: 539–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1979) Condition and diet in relation to habitat in bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus: population or community approach? Oikos 33: 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Henttonen H (1988) Rodent dynamics as community processes. TREE 3: 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestbeck J (1982) Population regulation of cyclic mammals; the social fence hypothesis. Oikos 39: 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1988) The experimental approach to rodent population dynamics. Oikos 52: 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Keller BL, Tamarin RH (1969) Microtus population biology: demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana. Ecology 50: 587–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Myers JH (1974) Population cycles in small mammals. Adv Ecol Res 8: 267–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ (1975) The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In: Petrusewicz K, Golley FB, Ryszkowski L (eds) Small mammals: their productivity and dynamics of populations. Cambridge Univ Press, London, pp 103–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ (1985) Dispersal. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of New World Microtus. Special Publication 8, Amer Soc Mammal, pp 420–454

  • Mihok S (1988) The role of mortality in models of small rodent population dynamics. Oikos 52: 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1985) Population dynamics and cycles. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of New World Microtus. Special Publication 8, Amer Soc Mammal, pp 567–620

  • Tamarin TH (1978) Dispersal, population regulation and K-selection in field mice. Am Nat 112: 545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC (1980) Spatial heterogeneity and population stability: some evolutionary consequences. Oikos 35: 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC (1983) Causes and consequences of dispersal in small mammals. In: Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ (eds) The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press/Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 63–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gliwicz, J. The first born, their dispersal, and vole cycles. Oecologia 83, 519–522 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317203

Key words

Navigation