Skip to main content
Log in

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of doxepin isomers

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Commercial preparations of the tricyclic antidepressant doxepin contain 15% of the more active cisdoxepin and 85% of the trans-isomer. The single dose pharmacokinetics of doxepin and its major metabolite N-desmethyldoxepin were examined in 30 healthy young men.

Results for total doxepin showed wide intersubject variation in all pharmacokinetic parameters except tmax and Cmax. Plasma levels of cis-doxepin were extremely low and it was only possible to estimate the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of the parent drug in 3 subjects. The data from those particular subjects resulted in an average ratio of cis- to trans-doxepin isomers in plasma of 15:85.

In contrast, the mean plasma levels of cis-N-desmethyldoxepin in 28 subjects exceeded those of the trans-isomer at every time point after 10 h, such that the areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) of cis-N-desmethyldoxepin were significantly higher than those of the corresponding trans-isomer. This phenomenon may play an important role in the therapeutic action of doxepin since it has been suggested that cis-N-desmethyldoxepin is pharmacologically active. In 2 subjects, however, the AUC 0-inf of trans-N-desmethyldoxepin were respectively 4 and 8 fold higher than those of the cis-isomer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pinder RM, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS (1977) Doxepin up-to-date: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy with a particular reference to depression. Drugs 13: 161–218

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joyce PR, Sharman JR (1985) Doxepin plasma concentrations in clinical practice; could there be a pharmacokinetic explanation for low concentrations? Clin Pharmacokinet 10: 365–370

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosseel MT, Bogaert MG, Claeys M (1978) Quantitative GLC determination of cis- and trans-isomers of doxepin and desmethyldoxepin. J Pharm Sci 67: 802–805

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hrdina PD, Bakish D, Swenson S, Lapierre YD (1990) Cis-and trans-isomers of doxepin and desmethyldoxepin in the plasma of depressed patients treated with doxepin. Ther Drug Monit 12: 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shu Y-Z, Hubbard JW, Cooper JK, McKay G, Korchinski ED, Kumar R, Midha KK (1990) The identification of urinary metabolites of doxepin in patients. Drug Metab Dispos 18: 735–741

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghabrial H, Prakash C, Tacke UG, Blair IA, Wilkinson GA (1991) Geometric isomerization of doxepin during its N-demethylation in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 19: 596–599

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faulkner RD, Pitts WM, Lee CS, Lewis WA, Fann WE (1983) Multiple-dose doxepin kinetics in depressed patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34: 509–515

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedel RO, Raskin MA (1975) Relationship of blood levels of sinequan to clinical effects in the treatment of depression in aged patients. In: Mendels J (ed.) Sinequan a monograph of recent clinical studies. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green D (1978) Clinical importance of doxepin plasma levels. J Clin Psychiat 39: 481–482

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ward NG, Bloom VL, Wilson L et al. (1982) Doxepin plasma levels and clinical response in depression: Preliminary findings. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2: 126–128

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ziegler VE, Biggs JT, Wylie LT, Rosen SH, Haft DJ, Coryell WH (1978) Doxepin kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 23: 573–579

    Google Scholar 

  12. Virtanen R, Scheinin M, Iisalo E (1980) Single dose pharmacokinetics of doxepin in healthy volunteers. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 47: 371–376

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wecker MT, Woodworth JR, Amsel LP, Hinsvark ON, Rotenberg KS (1986) Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two doxepin products. Clin Ther 8: 342–347

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kimura Y, Kume M, Kageyama K (1972) Absorption, distribution, excretion and metabolism of doxepin. Pharmacometrics (Tokyo) 6: 955–971

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hobbs DC (1969) Distribution and metabolism of doxepin. Biochem Pharmacol 18: 1941–1954

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hubbard JW, Cooper JK, Hawes EM, Jenden D, May PRA, Martin M, McKay G, Van Putten T, Midha KK (1985) Therapeutic monitoring of chlorpromazine I: Pitfalls in plasma analysis. Ther Drug Monit 7: 222–228

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brøsen K, Gram LF (1988) First pass metabolism of imipramine and desipramine: Impact of the sparteine oxidation phenotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 43: 400–406

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brøsen K, Zeugin T, Meyer UA (1991) Role of P450IID6. The target of sparteine-debrisoquin oxidation polymorphism, in the metabolism of imipramine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 49: 609–617

    Google Scholar 

  19. Breyer-Pfaff U, Wiest E, Prox A, Wachsmuth H, Protiva M, Sindelar K, Friebolin H, Krauss D, Kunzelmann P (1985) Phenolic metabolites of chlorprothixene in man and dog. Drug Metab Dispos 13: 479–489

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Midha, K.K., Hubbard, J.W., McKay, G. et al. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of doxepin isomers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42, 539–544 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314865

Key words

Navigation