Skip to main content
Log in

Isoelectric focusing of CSF proteins and the future evolution of multiple sclerosis: a clinical follow-up

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A clinical follow-up covering a period of 5–10 years after onset was performed in 150 patients with optic neuritis or other potential onset symptoms of MS. Thin-layer isoelectric focusing had been used for the initial CSF-protein analysis. No evidence for a more probable alternative diagnosis appeared in 147 patients while a non-MS diagnosis was established in 3 patients. Among these 147 subjects the planned follow-up was accomplished in 131 patients, but not in 16. An evolution into clinically definite MS occurred in 59 subjects, in whom oligoclonal CSF immunoglobulin was found in 92%. Further clinical activity without spatial dissemination—i.e. lesser degrees of diagnostic probability for MS—were found in 35 patients in whom oligoclonal CSF immunoglobulin components were detected in 86%. Among the 131 patients with a complete follow-up, 45 remained free from further clinical activity; oligoclonal CSF immunoglobulin components occurred in 40% of these patients. The frequency of further clinical activity with or without spatial dissemination was significantly higher in subjects exhibiting oligoclonal CSF immunoglobulin components than in those without such changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broman T, Andersen O, Bergmann L (1981) Clinical studies on multiple sclerosis. Presentation of an incidence material from Gothenburg. Acta Neurol Scand 63:6–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Confavreux C, Aimard G, Devic M (1980) Course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis assessed by the computerized data processing of 349 patients. Brain 103:281–300

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delmotte P (1971) Gel isoelectric focusing of cerebrospinal fluid proteins: a potential diagnostic tool. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 9:334–336

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delmotte P, Gonsette R (1977) Biochemical findings in multiple sclerosis. Isoelectric focusing of the CSF gammaglobulins in multiple sclerosis (262 cases) and other neurological diseases (272 cases). J Neurol 215:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fog T, Linnemann F (1970) The course of multiple sclerosis in 73 cases with computer-designed curves. Acta Neurol Scand 46 [Suppl 47]:1–175

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hallpike JF (1983) Clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis. In: Hallpike JF, Adams CWM, Tourtellotte WW (eds) Multiple sclerosis. Pathology, diagnosis and management. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 129–161

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kjellin KG, Sidén Å (1977) Aberrant CSF protein fractions found by electrofocusing in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 15:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kjellin KG, Sidén Å (1983) Cerebrospinal fluid proteins in infectious neurological diseases and Guillain-Barré syndrome. In: Wood JH (ed) Neurobiology of cerebrospinal fluid 2. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 369–386

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kjellin KG, Vesterberg O (1972) Thin-layer isoelectric focusing of cerebrospinal fluid proteins: a preliminary report with special reference to the diagnostic significance in multiple sclerosis. In: Proceedings of the 20th Congress of Scandinavian Neurologists. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp 379–380

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtzke JF (1970) Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 46:484–492

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtzke JF (1970) Clinical manifestations of multiple sclerosis. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds) Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. North-Holland Publising Company, Amsterdam Oxford, pp 161–216

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtzke JF, Beebe GW, Nagler B, Kurland LT, Auth TL (1977) Studies on the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Early prognostic features of the later course of the illness. J Chronic Dis 30:819–830

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laurenzi MA, Link H (1978) Comparison between agarose electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing of CSF for demonstration of oligoclonal immunoglobulin bands in neurological disorders. Acta Neurol Scand 58:148–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Link H, Kostulas V (1983) Utility of isoelectric focusing of cerebrospinal fluid and serum on agarose evaluated for neurological patients. Clin Chem 29:810–815

    Google Scholar 

  15. Livrea P, Trojano M, Simone IL, Zimatore GB, Lamontanara G, Leante R (1981) Intrathecal IgG synthesis in multiple sclerosis: comparison between isoelectric focusing and quantitative estimation of cerebrospinal fluid IgG. J Neurol 224:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mackay PR, Hirnao A (1967) Forms of benign multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 17:588–600

    Google Scholar 

  17. McAlpine D, Lumsden CE, Acheson ED (1972) Multiple sclerosis. A reappraisal. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller R (1949) Studies on disseminated sclerosis with special reference to symptomatology, course and prognosis. Acta Med Scand 133 [Suppl 222]:1–214

    Google Scholar 

  19. Olsson JE, Nilsson K (1979) Gamma globulins of CSF and serum in multiple sclerosis: isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gel and agar gel electrophoresis. Neurology (Minneap) 29:1383–1391

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olsson J-E, Link H, Müller R (1976) Immunoglobulin abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Relation to clinical parameters: disability, duration and age of onset. J Neurol Sci 27:233–245

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patzold U, Pocklington PR (1982) Course of multiple sclerosis. First results of a prospective study carried out of 102 MS patients from 1976–1980. Acta Neurol Scand 65:248–266

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtellotte WW (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rose AS, Ellison GW, Myers LW, Tourtellotte WW (1976) Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurology (Minneap) 26 (No. 6, part 2):20–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schumacher GA, Beebe G, Kibler RE, Kurland LT, Kurtzke JF, McDowell F, Nagler B, Sibley WA, Tourtellotte WW, Willmon TL (1965) Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: report by the panel on evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 122:552–568

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sidén Å (1980) Abnormal CSF immunoglobulin components detected by isoelectric focusing. J Neurol 224:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sidén Å, Kjellin KG (1978) CSF protein examinations with thin-layer isoelectric focusing in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 39:131–146

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stendahl-Brodin L, Link H (1980) Relation between benign course of multiple sclerosis and low-grade humoral immune response in cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43:102–105

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stendahl-Brodin L, Link H (1983) Optic neuritis: oligoclonal bands increase the risk of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 67:301–304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The initial part of the investigation was performed at the Department of Neurology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ersmark, B., Sidén, Å. Isoelectric focusing of CSF proteins and the future evolution of multiple sclerosis: a clinical follow-up. J Neurol 231, 117–121 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313677

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313677

Key words

Navigation