Skip to main content
Log in

Hemispheric differences in tactile and visual recognition of braille-like stimulus patterns with static and dynamic modes of inspection

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Braille-like patterns were presented unilaterally to both tactual and visual modalities. The subject's task was to identify the location of three dots in a 2 × 3 six-dot pattern. Specifically, tactual versus visual presentation, dynamic versus static presentation of tactual stimuli, learning, and gender were examined in relation to cerebral hemisheric differences. Data were analyzed in terms of both the number of individual stimulus dots and the number of complete three-dot patterns correctly identified with regard to their spatial location. Although no reliable laterality differences were obtained with the tactual-static condition, owing to a significant interaction between learning and side of stimulus presentation, dot positions were reported reliably more accurately when presented in a dynamic fashion, i. e., scanned by the subject, to the right hand. For the visual modality, both correct reports of individual dot positions as well as correct reports of the entire patterns were reliably more accurate for stimulus presentations to the right visual field. Increased familiarity with the task, i. e., learning accross trials, generally increased report accuracy, particularly for static presentations to the left hand. The effect of gender was negligible. The results are dicussed in terms of their theoretical implications for differential cerebral hemispheric specializations in terms of differential processing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach-y-Rita P (1979) Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker DJ (1972) Temporal order in disturbed reading. University Press, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bever TG (1975) Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: Holistic and analytic. Ann NY Acad Sci 263:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Bever TG, Chiarello RJ (1974) Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians. Science 185:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC, Crane HD, Link SW (1966) Effect of display movement on tactile pattern perception. Percept Psychophys 1:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmon A (1971) Disturbances of tactile sensitivity in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex 7:83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M (1976) Human neuroanatomy, 7th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JC (1980) Modes of vibrotactile pattern generation. J Exp Psycho Hu Percept Perform 6:151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron R (1963) The effect of handedness on the perception of simultaneity and temporal order. Brain 86:261–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Faglioni P, Scotti G, Spinnler H (1971) Spatial localization with brain damage. Brain 94:443–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather H (1976) Sex differences in cognition. Cognition 4:231–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LJ (1978) Sex differences in spatial ability: possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In: Kinsbourne M (ed) Asymmetrical function of the brain. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermelin B, O'Connor N (1971) Functional asymmetry in the reading of Braille. Neuropsychologia 9:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura D (1966) Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia 4:275–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura D (1969) Spatial localization in right and left visual fields. Can J Psychol 23:445–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura D (1973) The asymmetry of the human brain. Sci American 228:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne M (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 33:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RE (1968) Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Coole, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman JH (1979) Tactile pattern perception and tactile displays. In: Harmon L (ed) Proceedings of the Asilomar conference on interrelations of the communicative senses. (NSF Technical Report)

  • La Grone DW Jr (1942) An experimental study of the relationship of peripheral perception to factors in reading. J Exp Educ 11:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake DA, Bryden MP (1976) Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Brain Lang 3:266–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechelt EC (1980) Laterality differences and shifts as a function of tactile temporal pattern complexity: Implications for differential processing strategies of the cerebral hemispheres. Psychol Res 41:319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Agresti J, Sperry RW (1968) Differential perceptual capacities in major and minor hemispheres. Proc U S Nat Acad Sci 1151

  • Loomis JM (1974) Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation. Percept Psychophys 16:401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone J, Davidson W (1973) The relation between cerebral speech laterality and spatial ability with special reference to sex and hand preference. Neuropsychologica 11:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone J, Kertesz A (1973) Sex differences in cerebral processing of visuo-spatial tasks. Cortex 9:313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner B (1971) Interhemispheric differences and psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 27:272–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner B (1974) Hemispheric specialization: scope and limits. In: Schmitt FO and Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences third study program. MIT Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner B, Taylor L (1972) Right-hemisphere superiority in tactile pattern-recognition after cerebral commissurotomy: Evidence for nonverbal memory. Neuropsychologia 10:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebes RD (1971) Superiority of the minor hemisphere in commissurotomized man for the perception of part-whole relations. Cortex 7:333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Papcun G, Krashen S, Terbeek D, Remington R, Harshman R (1974) Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language, and/or something else? J Acoust Soc Am 55:1285–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel RG, Denckla MB, Spalten E (1974) The functional asymmetry of Braille letter learning in normal, sighted children. Neurology 24:733–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J, Tallal P (1980) Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Science 207:1380–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmes J (1968) Hemispheric specialization: A possible clue to mechanism. Neuropsychologia 6:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrick CE (in press) Cutaneous communication. In: Neff WD (ed) Contributions to sensory physiology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, NY

  • Smith MO, Chu J, Edmonston WE Jr (1977) Cerebral lateralization of haptic perception: Interaction of responses to Braille and music reveals a functional basis. Science 197:689–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Varney NR, Benton AL (1975) Tactile perception of direction in relation to handedness and familial hendedness. Neuropsychologia 13:449–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Witelson SF (1976) Sex and the single hemisphere: Specialization of the right hemisphere for spatial processing. Science 193:425–427

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by a Grant (A8621) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the second author. Offprint requests should be sent to Eugene C. Lechelt, Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, J.M., Lechelt, E.C. Hemispheric differences in tactile and visual recognition of braille-like stimulus patterns with static and dynamic modes of inspection. Psychol. Res 43, 293–305 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308453

Keywords

Navigation