Skip to main content
Log in

Nest defense and central place foraging: A model and experiment

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A graphical model presented here indicates that a nest-defending forager should stay closer to its nest, forage for shorter times per patch, and deliver smaller loads than predicated for delivery rate maximization. The effect is more pronounced farther from the nest, so that if nest defense is especially important, the predator should leave far patches sooner than near ones, and deliver smaller loads from farther away. Moreover, if the attack rate at the nest is increased, the defending forager should move closer and deliver smaller prey.

Experimental attacks with stuffed specimens at Gila woodpecker (Melanerpes uropygialis) nests produced the predicted changes in the foraging behavior of males, but not of females.

Mated pairs may work as a team to pursue simultaneously two conflicting goals—food delivery and nest protection—both of which affect the survivorship of the young. Sexual dimorphism in monogamous species may result in part from specialization in these roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. Theor Popul Biol 13:397–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a theory. Ecology 60:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich AP (1976) Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: some ecological and economic theories. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:235–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale S (1980) Foraging patterns of nesting Gila wood-peckers. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona

  • McCleery RH (1978) Optimal behavior sequences and decision making. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Staris GR, Mitchell RD (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1974) On the optimal aboveground activity of bannertail kangaroo rats. J Mammal 55:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1979) Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal foraging. Am Nat 114:902–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutch AF (1976) Parent birds and their young. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Wiley JW (1976) Sexual dimorphism in hawks and owls of North America. Ornithol Monogr 20:1–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martindale, S. Nest defense and central place foraging: A model and experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10, 85–89 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300167

Keywords

Navigation