Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of spinal bone loss and biochemical markers of bone remodeling after menopause in normal women

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to describe longitudinal patterns of spinal bone loss in normal women who undergo a natural menopause. The second objective was to determine if a proportion of women suffer excessively rapid postmenopausal bone loss from the spine. If this was the case it was the aim to devise a means of predicting the women at excess risk; but if all women lost bone at similar rates, the aim was to document changing loss rates over the first 5–8 postmenopausal years. Responding women in six suburban general practices recalled for cervical smears who had their last menstrual period 9–36 months previously were invited to participate in a longitudinal study of bone loss and the biochemical markers plasma osteocalcin and urinary hydroxyproline. Sixty-four subjects agreed to participate, a response rate of 80%. In the ensuing 5 years, six received hormone replacement therapy and are not reported on. The main outcome measures were rates of spinal bone loss over 5 years, measured by dual photon absorptiometry, and radial bone loss over the first 2 years measured to quantitative computed tomography. Spinal bone loss was similar between individuals, with 94% of the variability in the data being accounted for by a statistical model that assumed parallel rates of bone loss. A less restrictive model allowing women to have different rates of spinal bone loss accounted for 12% more of the remaining variance in the data than the previous model. However, rates of radial bone loss were more dissimilar between women than rates of spinal loss. The results of the biochemical data collected serially showed that the plasma osteocalcin rose slowly to a plateau at 5 years postmenopause; in contrast, the hydroxyproline fell progressively with time over the whole period of study. These results were interpreted as being consistent with diminishing rates of bone destruction which gradually reequilibrated with bone formation as time passed after menopause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ross PD, Davis JW, Vogel JM, Wasnich RD (1990) A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 46:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1989) Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 111:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Cauley JA and Genant HK (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263:665–668

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gärdsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE (1989) Predicting fractures in women by using forearm densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 44: 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE (1991) The impact of menopausal age on future fragility fracture risk factors. J Bone Miner Res 6:429–433

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C (1991) Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12-year study. Br Med J 303:961–964

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Rodbro P (1987) Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women. Lancet ii:1105–1108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steiger P, Cummings SR, Black DM, Spencer NE, Genant HK (1992) Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65. J Bone Miner Res 7:625–632

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kröger H, Heikkinen J, Laitinen K, Kotaniemi A (1992) Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in normal women. A cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers. Osteoporosis Int 2: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sugimoto T, Tsutsumi M, Fujii Y, Kawakatsu M, Negishi H, Lee MC, Tsai KS, Fukase M, Fujita T (1992) Comparison of bone mineral content among Japanese, Koreans and Taiwanese assessed by dual photon absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 7:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burger H, van Daele PLA, Algra D, van Ouweland F, Grobbee D, Hofman A, van Kuijk C, Schülte H, Birkenhager J, Pols H (1994) The association between age and bone mineral density in men and women aged 55 years and over. The Rotterdam Study. Bone Miner 25:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ross PD, He Y-F, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1994) Normal ranges for bone loss rates. Bone Miner 26:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1990) The contribution of bone loss of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1: 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falch JA, Sandvik L (1990) Perimenopausal appendicular bone loss: a 10-year prospective study. Bone 11:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harris S, Dawson-Hughes B (1992) Rates of change in bone mineral density of the spine, heel, femoral neck and radius in healthy postmenopausal women. Bone Miner 17:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C (1993) The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 52:340–343

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reeve J, Green JR, Hesp R, Justice J, Nicholls A, Charlett A, Greenwood R, Pearson J, Rinsler M and Klenerman L (1990) Determinants of axial bone loss in the early postmenopause: the Harrow bone loss study. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (eds). Osteoporosis 1990, vol 2. Osteopress ApS, Copenhagen pp 101–103

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hudson E, Klenerman L, Hesp R, Justice J, Nicholls A, Charlett A, Pearson J, Reeve J and Gordon H (1990) Vaginal cell cytology is a poor predictor of rates of bone loss in early postmenopause. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (eds). Osteoporosis 1990, vol 2. Osteopress ApS, Copenhagen, pp 582–584

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abraham R, Pearson J, Reeve J (1991) Calcium intake: important in early menopause? In: Heaney RP, Burckhart T (eds). Nutritional aspects of osteoporosis. Raven Press, New York, pp 191–204

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krolner B, Nielsen SP (1980) Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine. I. Theory and application of a new two-dimensional dual-photon attenuation method. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 40:653–663

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1988) Quantitative digital radiography vs dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  23. Exner GU, Prader A, Elsasser U, Rüegsegger P, Anliker M (1979) Bone densitometry using computed tomography. Part 1: selective determinants of trabecular bone density and other bone mineral parameters. Normal values in children and adults. Br J Radiol 52:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hangartner TN, Overton TR (1982) Quantitative measurement of bone density using gamma-ray computed tomography. J Comp Assist Tomog 6:1156–1162

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deacon AC, Hulme P, Hesp R, Green JR, Tellez M and Reeve J (1987) Estimation of whole body bone resorption rate: a comparison of urinary total hydroxyproline excretion with two radioisotopic tracer methods in osteoporosis. Clin Chim Acta 166: 297–306

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wand, Green JR, Hesp, R, Bradbeer J, Sambrook P, Smith T, Hampton L, Zanelli J and Reeve J (1992) Bone remodelling does not decline after menopause in vertebral fracture osteoporosis. Bone Miner 17:361–375

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nordin BEC, Polley KJ (1987) Metabolic consequences of the menopause. Calcif Tissue Int (suppl 1), 41:S1-S59

    Google Scholar 

  28. He Y-F, Davis JW, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1993) Declining bone loss rate variability with increasing follow-up time. Bone Miner 21:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE, Krall EA, Sadowski L, Sayhoun N, Tannenbaum S (1990) A controlled trial of the effect of calcium supplementation on bone density in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 323:878–883

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stépan JJ, Pospichal J, Presl J, Pacovsky V (1987) Bone loss and biochemical indices of bone remodelling in surgically induced menopausal women. Bone 8:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sherman SS, Tobin JD, Hollis B, Gundberg C, Ray T and Plato C (1992) Biochemical parameters associated with low bone density in healthy men and women. J Bone Miner Res 7:1123–1130

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brown JP, Malaval L, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD, Edouard C, Meunier PJ (1984) Serum bone gla-protein: a specific marker for bone formation in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet i:1091–1092

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eastell R (1994) Biochemical markers. In: Cooper C, Reeve J (eds) Spine: state of the art reviews, vol 8. pp 155–170

  34. Mole PA, Wilkinshaw MH, Robins SP, and Paterson CR (1992) Can urinary pyridinium cross-links and urinary oestrogens predict bone mass and rate of bone loss after the menopause? Eur J Clin Invest 22:767–771

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkinshaw MH, Mole PA, Paterson CR (1992) Potential value of urinary oestrogen assays in the identification of fast bone losses after the menopause. Osteoporosis Int 2:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  36. Law MR, Wald NJ, Meade TW (1991) Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture. Br Med J 303:453–459

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnell O, Cooper C, Melton LJ (1993) How do we prevent hip fractures? Lancet 341:89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. J. Justice

    Present address: , 255 Eastcote Lane, HA2 8RS, S. Harrow, UK

  2. J. Reeve

    Present address: University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Box 157, CB2 2QQ, Cambridge, UK

  3. L. Klenerman

    Present address: Academic Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, Liverpool University, L69 3BX, Liverpool, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC Clinical Research Centre & Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, HA1 3UJ, Harrow, UK

    J. Pearson, A. Mitchell, J. Green & E. Hudson

  2. Pinn Medical Centre, 8 Eastcote Road, HA5 1HF, Harrow, UK

    A. Nicholls & J. Justice

Authors
  1. J. Reeve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Nicholls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Justice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. Hudson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. L. Klenerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeve, J., Pearson, J., Mitchell, A. et al. Evolution of spinal bone loss and biochemical markers of bone remodeling after menopause in normal women. Calcif Tissue Int 57, 105–110 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298429

Key words

Search

Navigation