Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic linkage heterogeneity in the fragile X syndrome

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Genetic linkage between a factor IX DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and the fragile X chromosome marker was analyzed in eight fragile X pedigrees and compared to eight previously reported pedigrees. A large pedigree with apparently full penetrance in all male members showed a high frequency of recombination. A lod score of-7.39 at θ=0 and a maximum score of 0.26 at θ=0.32 were calculated. A second large pedigree with a non-penetrant male showed tight linkage with a maximum lod score of 3.13 at θ=0, a result similar to one large pedigree with a nonpenetrant male previously reported. The differences in lod scores seen in these large pedigrees suggested there was genetic heterogeneity in linkage between families which appeared to relate to the presence of nonpenetrant males. The combined lod score for the three pedigrees with nonpenetrant males was 6.84 at 0=0. For the 13 other pedigrees without nonpenetrant males the combined lod score was-21.81 at θ=0, with a peak of 0.98 at θ=0.28. When lod scores from all 16 families were combined, the value was-15.14 at θ=0 and the overall maximum was 5.13 at θ=0.17.

To determine whether genetic heterogeneity was present, three statistical tests for heterogeneity were employed. First, a “predivided-sample” test was used. The 16 pedigrees were divided into two classes, NP and P, based upon whether or not any nonpenetrant males were detected in the pedigree. This test gave evidence for significant genetic heterogencity whether the three large pedigrees with seven or more informative males (P<0.005), the eight pedigrees with three informative males (P<0.001), or all 16 pedigrees (P<0.001) were included in the analysis. Second, Morton's large sample test was employed. Significant heterogeneity was present when the analysis was restricted to the three large pedigrees (P<0.025), or to the eight pedigrees with informative males (P<0.05) but not when smaller, less informative pedigrees were also included. Third, an “admixture” test for heterogeneity was employed which tests for linkage versus no linkage. A trend toward significance was seen (0.05<P<0.10) which increased when the analysis was restricted to the larger, more informative pedigrees.

The pedigrees where nonpenetrant males are detected appear to constitute one class (NP) where tight linkage to factor IX is predicted. The pedigrees where full penetrance is present appear to consitute a second class (P) where loose linkage to factor IX is predicted. Either the chromosomal location of the mutation or suppression of recombination to nearby genes may be different in the two classes of pedigrees. In the NP class of fra X pedigrees, information from DNA analysis should be useful for carrier detection, prenatal diagnosis, and genetic counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown WT, Mezzacappa PM, Jenkins EC (1981) Screening for fragile X syndrome by testicular size measurement. Lancet II:1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown WT, Jenkins EC, Freidman E, Brooks J, Wisniewski K, Raguthu S, French J (1982) Autism is associated with the fragile X syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 12:303–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerino G, Mattei MG, Mattei JF, Jaye M, Mandel JL (1983) Close linkage of fragile X linked mental retardation syndrome to haemophilia B and transmission through a normal male. Nature 306:701–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantu JM, Scaglia HE, Medina M, Gonzalez-Diddi, Moreno ME, Perez-Palacios G (1976) Inherited congenital normofunctional testicular hyperplasia and mental deficiency. Hum Genet 33:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1971) The genetics of human populations. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 836–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo KH, George D, Filby G, Halliday JL, Leversha M, Webb G, Danks DM (1984) Linkage analysis of X-linked mental retardation with and without fragile-X using factor IX gene probe. Lancet I:349

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A, Ekblom L, Phillips S (1984) Constitutive fragile sites 1p31, 3p14, 6q26, and 16q23 and their use as controls for false-negative results with the fragile (X). Am J Med Genet 18:483–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn HG, Renpenning H, Gerrard JW, Miller JR, Tabata T, Federoff S (1963) Mental retardation as a sex-linked defect. Am J Ment Defic 67:827–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Froster-Iskenius U, Schulze A, Schwinger E (1984) Transmission of the marker X syndrome trait by unaffected males: Conclusion from studies of large families. Hum Genet 67:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryns JP, van den Berghe H (1982) Transmission of fragile (X)(q27) from normal male(s). Hum Genet 61:262–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RJM, Smart RD, Cornell JM, Merckel LM, Beighton P (1983) The fragile X chromosome in a large Indian kindred. Clin Genet 23:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge SE, Anderson CE, Neiswanger K, Sparkes RS, Rimoin DL (1983) The search for heterogeneity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM): Linkage studies, two-locus models, and genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 35:1139–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PA, Mayer M, Matsuura J, Rhoades F, Yee SC (1983) A cytogenetic study of a population of mentally retarded males with special reference to the marker (X) syndrome. Hum Genet 63:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins E, Duncan C, Brooks J, Lele K, Sanz M, Nolin S, Brown T (1983) Low frequency fragile X chromosomes in cultures from normal people. Am J Hum Genet 35 (6):136a(406)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Brooks J, Duncan CJ, Rudelli RD, Wisniewski HM (1984) Experience with prenatal fragile X detection. Am J Med Genet 17:215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Brooks J, Duncan CJ, Sanz MM, Silverman WP, Lele KP, Masia A, Katz E, Lubin RA, Nolin SL (to be published) Low frequencies of apparently fragile X chromosomes in normal control cultures: A possible explanation. Exp Cell Biol

  • Kahkonen M, Leisti J, Wilska M, Varonen S (1983) Marker X-associated mental retardation. A study of 150 retarded males. Clin Genet 23:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawczun MS, Jenkins EC, Brown WT (1985) Analysis of the fragile-X chromosome: Localization and detection of the fragile site in high resolution preparations. Hum Genet 69:209–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurachi L, Davie EW (1982) Isolation and characterization of a cDNA coding for human factor IX. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:6461–6464

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop GM, Lalouel JM (1984) Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. Am J Hum Genet 36:460–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin JP, Bell J (1943) A pedigree of mental defects showing sex linkage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 6:154–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton NE (1982) Outline of genetic epidemiology. Karger, Switzerland, p 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KB, Tommerup N, Poulsen H, Mikkelsen M (1981) X-linked mental retardation with fragile X. A pedigree showing transmission by apparently unaffected males and partial expression in female carriers. Hum Genet 59:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Opitz JM, Sutherland GR (1984) Conference Report: International Workshop on the fragile X and X-linked mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 17:5–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovich B, Vekemans M, Rosenblatt D, Monroe P (1982) Non-specific mental retardation. N Engl J Med 306:1551–1552

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads FA, Oglesby AC, Mayer M, Jacobs PA (1982) Marker X syndrome in an Oriental family with probable transmission by a normal male. Am J Med Genet 12:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch N, Baron M (1982) X-linkage and genetic heterogeneity in bipolar-related major affective illness: Reanalysis of linkage data. Ann Hum Genet 26:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SL, Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Turner G (1984) The marker (X) syndrome: A cytogenetic and genetic analysis. Ann Hum Genet 48:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SL, Jacobs PA, Morton NE, Froster-Iskenius U, Howard-Peebles PN, Nielsen KB, Partington MW, Sutherland GR, Turner G, Watson M (1985) Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males. Hum Genet 69:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin H, Flaherty L, Artzt K, Bennett D, Ravetch J (1983) Inversion in the H-2 complex of t-haplotypes in mice. Nature 306:380–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman W, Lubin R, Jenkins EC, Brown WT (1983) The strength of association between fragile (X) chromosome presence and mental retardation. Clin Genet 23:436–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola KOJ (1984) X-linked mental retardation with the marker X chromosome—A clinical and cytogenetic study. Thesis University of Helsinki

  • Smith CAB (1963) Testing for heterogeneity of recombination values in human genetics. Ann Hum Genet 27:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis J Mol Biol 98:503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo P, Purrello M, Rocchi M, Archidiacono N, Alhadeff B, Filippi G, Toniolo D, Martini G, Luzzatto L, Siniscalco M (1985) Cytological mapping of the human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene distal to the fragile-X site suggests a high rate of meiotic recombination across this site. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 81:7855–7859

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Roy BC, DeSmedt MC, Raes RH, Dumon JE, Leroy JG (1983) Fragile X trait in a large kindred: Transmission also through normal males. J Med Genet 20:286–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans M, Popovich B, Rosenblatt D, Monroe P (1983) Chromosomal breakage in normal and fragile X subjects using low folate culture conditions. J Med Genet 20:404–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel F (1985) Mutation and selection in the marker (X) syndrome. A hypothesis. Ann Hum Genet 48:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren ST, Glover TW, Davidson RL, Jagadeeswaran P (1985) Linkage and recombination between fragile X-linked mental retardation and the factor IX gene Hum Genet 69:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski KC, French JH, Fernando S, Brown WT, Jenkins EC, Friedman E, Hill AL, Miezejeski CM (to be published) The fragile X syndrome: Associated neurological abnormalities and developmental disabilities. Ann Neurol

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, W.T., Gross, A.C., Chan, C.B. et al. Genetic linkage heterogeneity in the fragile X syndrome. Hum Genet 71, 11–18 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295659

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295659

Keywords

Navigation