Skip to main content
Log in

Closeness between female college students and their professors: A novel assessment technique

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An empirical investigation was conducted using a technique developed by Adler to assess how close female college students felt toward their professors. The sample included mostly white college women enrolled in a psychology of women course. The women felt closer to their female professors than to their male professors. The findings have pedagogical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adler, L. L., & Graubert, J. G. (1975). Projected social distances from mental patient related items by male and female volunteers and nonvolunteers. Psychological Reports, 37, 515–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, L. L., & Graubert, J. G. (1976). Projected social distances from mental patient-related stimuli in cross-national perspective: Four English-speaking countries. International Journal of Group Tensions, 6, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, L. L., & Iverson, M. A. (1975). Projected social distance as a function of praise conditions and status orientation: Comparison with physical interpersonal spacing in the laboratory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 659–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women. (1992). The American Association of University Women report: How school shortchanges girls. Washington, DC: The American Association of University Women Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. J., & Larkin, J. (1991). The anatomy of dominance and self-protection. American Psychologist, 46, 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A., Cornelius, R., & Gray, J. (1988). The chilly climate: Fact or artifact? Journal of Higher Education, 59, 527–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. K. (1989). Higher education for women. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23, 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1991). Juggling: The unexpected advantages of balancing career and home for women and their families. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., Farrell, R., & Franck, C. (1991). Role expectations among college females and males. Unpublished paper, Psychology Department, Smith College, Northampton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley, M., & Portuges, C. (1985). Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. (pp. 36–58). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubert, J. G., & Adler, L. L. (1977). Cross-national comparisons of projected social distances from mental patient-related stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 881–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. (1984). Identity and expression: A writing course for women. In F. Howe (Ed.), Myths of co-education. (pp. 28–46). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1991). Gender and relationships: A reprise. American Psychologist, 46, 538–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paludi, M. A., De Four, D. C., Schneider, P., Gover, S., West, R., & Dekelbaum, D. (1990, August). The mentoring experiences questionnaire: Initial psychometric analyses. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Reis, H. T. (1990). The role of intimacy in interpersonal relations. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendships in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K., Draper, R. D., & Pendergrass, M. L. (1986). Personal epistemology and personal experience. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Secrest, L. (1970). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worell, J., Stilwell, D., & Robinson, D. (1991, May). Constructions of feminist identity development: Stages or dimensions? Paper presented at the 7th annual Nag's Head Conference on Gender Theory and Research, Highland Beach, FL.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Susan Eckstein, Maria Narvaez, Kathleen Peets, Ann Pufall, Sue Rosenberg Zalk, and two anonymous reviewers for their help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crosby, F.J., Reinardy, L.M. Closeness between female college students and their professors: A novel assessment technique. Sex Roles 28, 477–483 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289609

Keywords

Navigation