Abstract
An empirical investigation was conducted using a technique developed by Adler to assess how close female college students felt toward their professors. The sample included mostly white college women enrolled in a psychology of women course. The women felt closer to their female professors than to their male professors. The findings have pedagogical implications.
References
Adler, L. L., & Graubert, J. G. (1975). Projected social distances from mental patient related items by male and female volunteers and nonvolunteers. Psychological Reports, 37, 515–521.
Adler, L. L., & Graubert, J. G. (1976). Projected social distances from mental patient-related stimuli in cross-national perspective: Four English-speaking countries. International Journal of Group Tensions, 6, 15–25.
Adler, L. L., & Iverson, M. A. (1975). Projected social distance as a function of praise conditions and status orientation: Comparison with physical interpersonal spacing in the laboratory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 659–664.
American Association of University Women. (1992). The American Association of University Women report: How school shortchanges girls. Washington, DC: The American Association of University Women Education Foundation.
Caplan, P. J., & Larkin, J. (1991). The anatomy of dominance and self-protection. American Psychologist, 46, 536.
Constantinople, A., Cornelius, R., & Gray, J. (1988). The chilly climate: Fact or artifact? Journal of Higher Education, 59, 527–550.
Conway, J. K. (1989). Higher education for women. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 633–639.
Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23, 101–122.
Crosby, F. (1991). Juggling: The unexpected advantages of balancing career and home for women and their families. New York: The Free Press.
Crosby, F., Farrell, R., & Franck, C. (1991). Role expectations among college females and males. Unpublished paper, Psychology Department, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Culley, M., & Portuges, C. (1985). Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Eccles, J. S. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. (pp. 36–58). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Graubert, J. G., & Adler, L. L. (1977). Cross-national comparisons of projected social distances from mental patient-related stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 881–882.
Howe, F. (1984). Identity and expression: A writing course for women. In F. Howe (Ed.), Myths of co-education. (pp. 28–46). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.
Maccoby, E. E. (1991). Gender and relationships: A reprise. American Psychologist, 46, 538–539.
Paludi, M. A., De Four, D. C., Schneider, P., Gover, S., West, R., & Dekelbaum, D. (1990, August). The mentoring experiences questionnaire: Initial psychometric analyses. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Reis, H. T. (1990). The role of intimacy in interpersonal relations. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 15–30.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
Rubin, L. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendships in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.
Unger, R. K., Draper, R. D., & Pendergrass, M. L. (1986). Personal epistemology and personal experience. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 67–80.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Secrest, L. (1970). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574–587.
Worell, J., Stilwell, D., & Robinson, D. (1991, May). Constructions of feminist identity development: Stages or dimensions? Paper presented at the 7th annual Nag's Head Conference on Gender Theory and Research, Highland Beach, FL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank Susan Eckstein, Maria Narvaez, Kathleen Peets, Ann Pufall, Sue Rosenberg Zalk, and two anonymous reviewers for their help.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crosby, F.J., Reinardy, L.M. Closeness between female college students and their professors: A novel assessment technique. Sex Roles 28, 477–483 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289609
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289609