Summary
In vitro culture experiments were carried out with three birch genotypes characterized by certain genealogical relationships which serve as indicators of genetic similarity or dissimilarity. Each genotype was grown in each of six different environments (medium types), and callus growth and colour were observed. The aim was to improve our understanding of the operation of genetic and environmental effects at the early stages of regeneration in vitro. For this purpose we tried to answer the question as to whether genetic differences exert effects that are consistently distinguishable under different environments or whether environmental differences exert effects that are consistently distinguishable between different genotypes. Since conventional analytical methods, such as the analysis of variance, are inappropriate for providing satisfactory answers to this question, we applied a new concept of interpretation. With the help of this concept we obtained the following results which appear to be unique among their kind. 1) For both characters, callus growth and callus colour, genetic differences are masked only slightly by the environments while environmental differences are almost completely masked by the genotypes. Thus, in the present experiment, interaction is one-sided in the sense that environmental effects interact strongly with genotypic effects but genotypic effects interact only slightly with the environmental ones. 2) Nuclear effects seem to be responsible for the differences observed in callus growth, while the differences in callus colour can be explained by the joint action of nuclear and extranuclear effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuja MR (1983) Somatic cell differentiation and rapid clonal progapation of aspen. Silvae Genet 32:131–136
Colijn CM, Mol JNM, Kool AJ, Nijkamp HJJ (1983) Plastid gene expression in a yellow-green leaf mutant of Petunia hybrida. Planta 157:209–217
Glock H, Gregorius H-R (1984) Differentiation — a consequence of idiotype-environment interaction. BioSystems 17:23–34
Gregorius H-R (1977) The genotype × environment-to-phenotype relationship. Theor Appl Genet 49:165–176
Gregorius H-R, Namkoong G (1985) Resolving the dilemmas of interaction, separability and additivity. J Theor Biol (submitted)
Lewontin RC (1974) The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am J Hum Genet 26:400–411
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Pan WL, Jackson WA, Moll RH (1985) Nitrate uptake and partitioning by corn root systems. Plant Physiol 77:560–566
Reddy VS, Leelavathi S, Sen SK (1985) Influence of genotype and culture medium on microspore callus induction and green plant regeneration in anthers of Oryza sativa. Physiol Plant 63:309–314
Sachs L (1974) Angewandte Statistik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Srivastava PS, Steinhauer A (1982) In vitro culture of embryo segments of Quercus lebani: organogenesis and callus growth as a differential response to experimental conditions. Z Pflanzenphysiol 106:93–96
Suzuki DT, Griffith AJF, Lewontin RC (1981) An introduction to genetic analysis. Freeman, San Francisco
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by P.M.A. Tigerstedt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glock, H., Gregorius, H.R. Genotype — environment interaction in tissue cultures of birch. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 477–482 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289529
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289529