Skip to main content
Log in

Managers' conflict management style and leadership effectiveness: The moderating effects of gender

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we examined gender differences in (1) global self-reported conflict management styles, (2) the behaviors displayed and outcomes attained by group leaders during a simulated conflict episode, and (3) the evaluation of leaders' behavior by their subordinates. We investigated conflict management using 43 role-play groups involving leaders with actual managerial experience. We assessed behavior through subordinate and leader evaluations as well as transcript codings of the discussion. There were no gender differences in self-reported conflict management style among experienced managers. However, among participants without managerial experience, women rated themselves as more integrating, obliging, and compromising than did men. There were no gender differences in the styles used by supervisors during the role play nor in the outcomes they attained. Yet there were differences in the way that subordinates evaluated male and female supervisors who used similar styles. Dominating was more negatively related, and obliging more positively related, to subordinates' perceptions of effectiveness for women than for men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baril, G. L., Korabik, K., Watson, C., Grencavage, L. M., & Gutkowski, J. M. (1990, June). Managers' conflict resolution behaviors as predictors of leadership effectiveness. A paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Conflict Management, Vancouver, BC.

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership. (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A., & Shepard, T. L. (1978). Sex-role identity, sex of other, and affective relationship as determinants of interpersonal conflict-management styles. Sex Roles, 4, 813–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Geis, F. L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, D. L. (1979). A comparison of men and women managers on preferences for organization: Conflict management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

  • Chanin, M. N., & Schneer, J. A. (1984). A study of the relationship between Jungian personality dimensions and conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, 37, 863–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chusmir, L. H., & Mills, J. (1988, August). Resolution of conflict: Managerial gender differences. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: An analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H., & Platz, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: How real are they? Academy of Management Review, 11, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euwema, M. C., & van de Vliert, E. (1990, June). The influence of sex on managers' perception, attributions, stress and behavior in conflict with their subordinates. A paper presented at the third conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Vancouver, BC.

  • Graen, G., & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haccoun, D. M., Haccoun, R. R., & Sallay, G. (1978). Sex differences in the appropriateness of supervisory styles: A nonmanagement review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmer, J. R. (1980). The effects of occupational category, organizational level, organizational size, sex and conflict opponent on the conflict-handling styles of hospital management personnel. Unpublished MBA thesis, Youngstown State University.

  • Jago, A. G., & Vroom, V. H. (1982). Sex differences in the incidence and evaluation of participative leader behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killmann, R. H., & Thomas, K. W. (1977). Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “MODE” instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K. (1990). Androgyny and leadership style. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1987, August). Androgyny and leadership: A conceptual synthesis. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

  • Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1988). Should women managers have to act like men? Journal of Management Development, 8, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K., & Baril, G L. (1988). Content coding for ten conflict management dimensions. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Maier, N. R. F., Solem, A. R., & Maier, R. A. (1975). The role play technique. San Diego, CA: University Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1982). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M. M., & Lee, G. K. (1975). Moderating effects of sex of supervisor and subordinate on relationships between supervisory behavior and subordinate satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 624–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1988). Women and men in management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1983a). Rahim organizational conflict inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1983b). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, P. A. (1975). Perception and management of superior-subordinate conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 444–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, P. A. (1977). The effects of sex differences on the perception and management of superior-subordinate conflict: An exploratory study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. B., & Hautaluoma, J. (1988). Effects of importance of issues, gender, and power of contenders on conflict management style. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 699–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, T. L., & Stander, N. E. (1990, June). Effects of role and gender on conflict-handling styles. A paper presented at the third conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Vancouver, BC.

  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley-Zalabak, P. (1981). The effects of sex differences on the preference for utilization of conflict styles of managers in a work setting: An exploratory study. Public Personnel Management Journal, 10, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnett (ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. (1988). When a woman is the boss: Dilemmas in taking charge. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weider-Hatfield, D. (1988). Assessing the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-II (ROCI-II). Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 350–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. G., & Eskilson, A. (1982). The interaction of sex and power base on perceptions of managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelsma, P., & Brown, C. T. (1985). Gender roles, biological sex, and predisposition to conflict management. Sex Roles, 12, 731–747.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The three authors contributed equally to this research project. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Russell Day, Lisa Grencavage, Joan Gutkowski, and Shawn Smith for their help in developing the content coding scheme, coding, and collecting the data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korabik, K., Baril, G.L. & Watson, C. Managers' conflict management style and leadership effectiveness: The moderating effects of gender. Sex Roles 29, 405–420 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289432

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289432

Keywords

Navigation