Abstract
Through their organization and curricula, schools either promote separate roles for males and females or operate to minimize differences. This study describes sex differences in science and reading achievement and attitudes for nationwide samples of 14-year-old children in the United States, Sweden, and England. There are largely the same sex differences in all three countries: Male and female pupils have similar reading skills, while girls have more positive reading habits; males outperform females in science, with the smallest difference observed for biology; males have more positive attitudes toward science, except that females believe science to be at least as important a topic as boys do. There is no noteworthy increase in sex distinctions with one more year of schooling, from grade 8 to grade 9. However, in English coeducational schools, girls show a deceleration in science and vocabulary achievement relative to their male peers. Girls in English one-sex schools exceed their male counterparts in reading and several science subjects. It is hypothesized that the role of successful female teachers and peers, and the absence of social pressure from boys, may facilitate girls' learning in these areas. A study is proposed of specific school practices and the ways in which they determine sex discrepancies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, D. E., Clark, V. B., & Fitchett, G. W. Reading rights for boys: Sex role in language experience. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Backman, M. E. Patterns of mental abilities: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences. American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 9, 1–12.
Camerini, I. The ideal and the reality: Women in Sweden. In J. I. Roberts (Ed.), Beyond intellectual sexism: A new woman, a new reality. New York: David McKay, 1976.
Comber, L. C., & Keeves, J. P. Science education in nineteen countries: International studies in evaluation I. New York: Halsted Press, 1973.
Dale, R. R. Mixed or single-sex school? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.
Dwyer, C. A. Sex differences in reading: An evaluation and a critique of current methods. Review of Educational Research, 1973, 43, 455–467.
Fennema, E. Women and girls in the public schools: Defeat or liberation? In J. I. Roberts (Ed.), Beyond intellectual sexism: A new woman, a new reality. New York: David McKay, 1976.
Finn, J. D. Multivariance: Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance and regression: A Fortran IV program. Version 5.2. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1974.
Finn, J. D., & Kotlewski, L. D. Components of achievement in science. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1976.
Finn, J. D., Gaier, E. L., Peng, S., & Banks, R. E. Teacher expectations and pupil achievement: A naturalistic study. Urban Education, 1975, 10, 175–197.
Flanagan, J. C., Dailey, J. T., Shaycroft, M. F., Gorham, W. A., Goldberg, I., & Neyman, C. A., Jr. Counselor's technical manual for interpreting test scores (Project Talent). Palo Alto: American Institutes for Research, 1961.
Gates, A. I. Sex differences in reading ability. Elementary School Journal, 1961, 61, 431–434.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. Questioned equality for grade one boys and girls. The Reading Teacher, 1971, 25, 247–252.
Husén, T. Implications of the IEA findings for the philosophy of comprehensive education. In A. C. Purves & D. U. Levine (Eds.), Educational policy and international assessment. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing, 1975.
Johnson, D. D. Sex differences in reading across cultures. Reading Research Quarterly, 1973, 9, 67–86.
Kelly, A. A discouraging process: How women are eased out of science. Paper presented at the Conference on “Girls and Science Education” at Chelsea College, March 1975. (Available from the author at 24 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9JT, United Kingdom.)
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. Sex differences in intellectual functioning. In Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1972.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
Maiden, N. Ratio of boys to girls among disabled readers. The Reading Teacher, 1976, 29, 439–442.
Meyer, W. J., & Thompson, G. G. Sex differences in the distribution of teacher approval and disapproval among sixth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 385–397.
Minuchin, P. The schooling of tomorrow's woman. School Review, 1972, 80, 199–208.
Palardy, J. M. What teachers believe — what children achieve. Elementary School Journal, 1969, 69, 370–374.
Stanchfield, J. M. Differences in learning patterns of boys and girls. In M. P. Douglass (Ed.), Self and society. Yearbook of the Claremont Reading Conference, 1968, 32, 218–227.
Svensson, A. Relative achievement. School performance in relation to intelligence, sex and home environment. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1971.
Thorndike, R. L. Reading comprehension education in fifteen countries. International studies in evaluation III. New York: Halsted Press, 1973.
Tyler, L. E. The antecedents of two varieties of vocational interests. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1964, 70, 170–227.
Walberg, H. J. Physics, femininity, and creativity. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1, 47–54.
Weinberg, S., & Rabinowitz, J. A sex difference in the Wechsler IQ vocabulary scores as a predictor of strategy in a probability-learning task performed by adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 3, 218–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this article was presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1976. The author is grateful to Heidi Wolfstetter-Kausch for assistance in researching background material for the article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finn, J.D. Sex differences in educational outcomes: A cross-national study. Sex Roles 6, 9–26 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288358
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288358