Skip to main content
Log in

Common responses of cultured soybean cells to 2,4-D starvation and fungal elicitor treatment

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The patterns of in vivo protein synthesis in soybean cell suspensions were compared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis after the cells had been submitted to different stress conditions : treatment with Phytophthora megasperma (Pmg) cell wall elicitors, 2,4-D starvation and heat shock (HS) temperatures. Changes in protein synthesis patterns induced after elicitation of cell suspensions or after infection of soybean hypocotyls by Pmg were found to be similar to changes brought about by auxin starvation of the cells. Changes common to both stress situations involve a prominent 17 kDa peptide family and 27, 29, 35 and about 45 kDa peptides. Moreover, “defense” reactions, i.e. glyceollin accumulation and synthesis of chalcone synthase (CHS) were also strongly stimulated in auxin-starved cells. On the contrary, although characteristic sets of low molecular weight heat shock (HS) proteins were synthesized by cells grown at 37°C, no clear similarity was observed with peptides characteristic of auxin-starved cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

Pmg:

Phytophthora megasperma Drechs f.sp.glycinea

HS:

heat shock

PR:

pathogenesis-related

SDS-PAGE:

sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

IEF:

isoelectrofocusing

iP:

isoelectric point

kDa:

kilodalton

P17:

17 kDa peptide group of soybean cells cultured in vitro

CHS:

chalcone synthase

References

  • Abeles FB, Forrence LE (1970) Plant Physiol 45: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers AR, Ebel J, Valent B, Albersheim P (1976) Plant Physiol 57: 760–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell AA (1981) Annu Rev Plant Physiol 32: 21–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden RS, Bailey JA (1975) Phytochem 14: 1389–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CL, Bell JN, Ryder TB, Bailey JA, Schuch W, Bolwell P, Robbins MP, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ (1985) EMBO J 4: 277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarneka E, Edelman L, Schoffl F, Key JL (1984) Plant Mol Biol 3: 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Dische AZ (1962) in Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, RL Whistler, ML Wolfrom eds, Academic Press, New York. pp. 478–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RA, Dey PM, Lamb CJ (1983) Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology 53: 1–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RA, Fuller KW (1976) Physiol Plant Pathol 9: 299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RA, Fuller KW (1978) Physiol Plant Pathol 12: 279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel J, Ayers AR, Albersheim P (1976) Plant Physiol 57: 775–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel J, Schmidt WE, Loyal R (1984) Arch Biochem Biophys 232: 240–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlach GT, Budde AD, Sequeira L, Helgeson JP (1978) Plant Physiol 62: 522–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahlbrock K, Lamb LC, Purwin C, Ebel J, Fantz E, Schafer E, (1981) Plant Physiol 67: 768–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson JP, Haberlach GT, Budde AD, Sequeira L (1976) Plant Physiol 57: 80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen NT (1975) Science 187: 74–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Key JL, Lin CY, Chen YM (1981) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 3526–3530

    Google Scholar 

  • Key JL, Kimpel JA, Lin CY, Nagao RT, Vierling E, Czarneka E, Gurley WB, Roberts JK, Mansfield MA, Edelman L (1985) in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plant Stress, JL Key and T Kosuge eds, pp 161–179, AR Liss Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kombrink E, Hahlbrock K (1986) Plant Physiol 81: 216–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 227: 680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton MA, Dixon RA, Hahlbrock K, Lamb C (1983) Eur J Biochem 129: 593–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Leguay JJ, Jouanneau JP (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6:235–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyne RL, Mulheirn LJ, Leworthy D (1976) J.C.S. Chem Comm 497–498

  • Mohnen D, Shinshi H, Felix G, Meins F (1985) EMBO J 4: 1631–1635

    Google Scholar 

  • Redolphi P (1983) Neth J Plant Path 89: 245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery PH, Fosket DE (1969) Planta 87: 54–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmelzer E, Somssich I, Hahlbrock K (1985) Plant Cell Rep 4: 293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder J, Kreuzaler F, Schafer E, Hahlbrock K (1979) J Biol Chem 254: 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinshi H, Mohnen D, Meins F (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter AM, Bell JN, Cramer CL, Bailey JA, Varner JE, Lamb CJ (1985) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 6551–6555

    Google Scholar 

  • Somssich IE, Schmelzer E, Bollmann J, Hahlbrock K (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 2427–2430

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC (1985) Plant Mol Biol 4: 111–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. M. Boudet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leguay, J.J., Piécoup, M., Puckett, J. et al. Common responses of cultured soybean cells to 2,4-D starvation and fungal elicitor treatment. Plant Cell Reports 7, 19–22 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272969

Keywords

Navigation