Summary
Spatial summation has been studied in simple cells of the cat's visual cortex by examining the responses to pairs of lines. One line was placed in an ON region of the receptive field; the other was placed in an OFF region. When the luminances of the lines were modulated in anti-phase, the excitatory responses to the individual lines were almost synchronous. A simple cell's overt response to the composite stimulus was usually greater than the sum of the overt responses to the two components. The result could be explained by supposing that the underlying response was the linear sum of the excitatory signals but that an overt response occurred only when the underlying response exceeded a fixed threshold value. This was true even of simple cells which exhibited non-linearities of spatial summation, as judged from the waveforms of their responses to moving sinusoidal gratings. When the two lines were modulated in phase, the excitatory responses occurred in different halves of the temporal cycle. Some cells summed antagonistic signals linearly. The waveforms of their responses to moving sinusoidal gratings also implied linear spatial summation. However, other cells whose responses to moving gratings implied linearity of summation did not, in fact, sum antagonistic signals linearly. The excitatory responses evoked in a receptive field region were weaker than the inhibitory responses that could be evoked in the same region. The remaining cells did not sum antagonistic signals linearly. There was imperfect cancellation, resulting in the generation of ON-OFF response components. The excitatory responses evoked in a receptive field region were stronger than the inhibitory responses that could be evoked in the same region. These cells gave responses to sinusoidal gratings that did imply non-linear spatial summation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht DG, Hamilton DB (1982) Striate cortex of cat and monkey: contrast response function. J Neurophysiol 48: 217–237
Dean AF (1981) The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 318: 413–427
Dean AF, Tolhurst DJ (1983) On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 344: 305–325
Dean AF, Tolhurst DJ (1986) Factors influencing the temporal phase of response to bar and grating stimuli for simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 62: 143–151
Einstein G, Davis TL, Sterling P (1983) Convergence of neurons in layer IV (cat area 17) of lateral geniculate terminals containing round or pleomorphic vesicles. Soc Neurosci Abstr 9: 820
Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG (1966) The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 187: 517–552
Field DJ, Tolhurst DJ (1986) The structure and symmetry of simple cell receptive field profiles, in cat visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 228: 379–400
Glezer VD, Tsherbach TA, Gauselman VE, Bondarko VM (1982) Spatio-temporal organization of receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. Biol Cybern 43: 35–49
Heggelund P (1986) Quantitative studies of enhancement and suppression zones in the receptive field of simple cells in cat striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 373: 293–310
Heggelund P, Krekling S, Skottun BC (1983) Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 52: 87–98
Henry GH, Goodwin AW, Bishop PO (1978) Spatial summation of responses in receptive fields of single cells in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 32: 245–266
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1959) Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 148: 574–591
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160: 106–154
Ikeda H, Wright MJ (1974) Sensitivity of neurones in visual cortex (area 17) under different levels of anaesthesia. Exp Brain Res 20: 471–484
Kulikowski JJ, Bishop PO (1981) Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 44: 386–400
Lee BB, Elepfandt A, Virsu V (1981) Phase of responses to moving sinusoidal gratings in cells of cat retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol 45: 807–817
Marr D, Hildreth E (1980) Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 207: 187–217
McGuire BA, Stevens JK, Sterling P (1986) Microcircuitry of beta ganglion cells in cat retina. J Neurosci 6: 907–918
Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978) Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 283: 53–77
Palmer LA, Davis TL (1981) Receptive field structure in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 46: 260–276
Schumer RA, Movshon JA (1984) Length summation in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Vision Res 24: 565–571
Shapley RM, Hochstein S (1975) Visual spatial summation in two classes of geniculate cells. Nature (Lond) 256: 411–413
Sillito AM (1975) The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 250: 305–329
Tanaka K (1983) Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. J Neurophysiol 49: 1303–1318
Tanaka K (1985) Organization of geniculate inputs to visual cortical cells in the cat. Vision Res 25: 357–364
Tolhurst DJ, Thompson ID (1981) On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 213: 183–199
Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Thompson ID (1981) The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res 41: 414–419
Toyama K, Kimura M, Tanaka K (1981) Cross-correlation analysis of interneuronal connectivity in cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 46: 191–201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tolhurst, D.J., Dean, A.F. Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Exp Brain Res 66, 607–620 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270694
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270694